Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

MoneyLa, you can react all aggrivated but you are the reporter doing the research on Singer's system. Why is it you can't get the info on how he won that million dollars? I read very well and I haven't missed anything. The hole you're digging for yourself is getting bigger and bigger. I'm not the one having the urge to find out what his system is about. I don't care how he won that million. For all I know he has had that million all along and never won a dime. Maybe he inherited money from a rich aunt, maybe he was struck by lightning and ended up finding one million in the back of his truck. All of Singer's statements mean nothing as long as you're not willing to ask him to prove his statements. A bank statement won't cut it..........You would like me to call Singer a liar but I don't because I don't know just as you don't know. Nobody has known for the past five years except for Singer. Where is his proof? Why don't you ask him to show the proof. It should be very easy for you. Instead of investing your time and energy in gathering proof you continue to jibber jabber about math, probability, negative or positive er games, win goals, money managament, etc.

So start asking the right questions already will you?
Your words: "You see the problem I'm having is that million dollars he won. I want to know why? No one seems to be tackling that question."
Do you have any idea how stupid that makes you look? You are the reporter and you can't get a straight answer (with proof) from Singer. So you really are missing some clues here...........And nobody got those straight answers from Singer during the last five years. Still you don't question Singer's integrity but continue to try and convince his critics there's value to his "system". But I'm not getting all of this....................right................sweet dreams

Very good Lurker. Here you go:

Despite everything you've read or heard about patterns and hot cycles and special plays Rob says the #1 reason for him banking those wins came down to this: leaving the casino after reaching a win goal. And money management.

Sounds simple enough but even that is challenged.

Good night.

Ahh, . . . this is indeed the crux of the matter.

Now, if someone can just explain why success is unlikely employing this method when a game has a negative expectation and each hand is in fact randomly generated, . . . this thread can be successfully terminated, . . . given that no one can reasonably be expected to explain how Rob Singer got $1,000,000.

The reason Singer could have won a million dollars has been mentioned many times. High variance. All it takes is for Singer to have had much better luck at the high levels of his progression. A RF at the $10 denomination yields $40K while one at the $1 level yields $4K.

As I indicated earlier my simulations showed that .03% of the players would do as well as Singer has claimed.

So, I hope that is cleared up. There is a slight possibility Singer is telling the truth. Of course, the chances of anyone using his system and doing as well IN THE FUTURE is slim as well. Would anyone really choose a method with that probability? Well, maybe Lloyd and Harry (for those who didn't know my previous dialogue was from the movie Dumb and Dumber) would, but not any person with a mid 2 digit IQ or larger.

So Money, now you know the answer. You no longer have to keep repeating it. All you need to do is figure out how to be luckier than 99.97% of the gamblers. BTW, I forgot to mention that .04% lost over $700,000 so make sure to have a good sized bankroll.

OK Money, now we'll discuss something that has nothing to do with math. When you are presented with someone making fantastic claims what do you do? I hope you look at the person. Is that person a pathological lair? Does that person make other claims that are verifiably false? Etc.

Well, in the case of Rob Singer it is more than obvious that the person has an ego the size of the MGM Grand. Just look at the comment reposted by lurker. Does that kind of person want attention? Hmmmmm, that's a tough one. Has the person been caught in numerous lies? Yup, another tough one. Has the person gone through bankruptcy at least once (we still don't know why he took off from Phoenix and is now living in a trailer) ... bingo.

So, please explain why anyone in their right mind would believe a person making fantastic claims of good fortune and trying to pass that off as a repeatable system? Oh yeah, they're making a little money while stroking their ego as well? You'd have to be nuts to believe them (or have an IQ right up their with Lloyd and Harry).

moneyla himself has repeatedly been caught lies, so i dont really expect him to find anything wrong with any lie singer may have told.

Pretty simple then, if that's what his "system" is about, it's non-existant......So what was the big deal? There wasn't really somehting to report about then was there? So it was all about attention after all? Any other interesting stories on your website? We're waiting for you to post some links with hot and happenin stories

Exactly So.

This Thread Is Closed.

Oh NO. Please don't close this thread.

I thought this thread was about the FK evaluation.

And, don't care how long it is, or how many words, or how many fancy words I'm going to need to look up in my Fu*k & Wagnal's to define.