Well folks, here's another interesting Singer post. Please draw your own conclusions....:
"Come on Alan, you know how unforgiving video poker is. I lost as an "optimal play expert" when good pay tables & cash back were common, then I had a good run by understanding how important luck was to winning and taking maximum advantage of it.
No one beats this game consistently no matter how smart they make everyone think they are, how fast or flawlessly they claim to play, or how they supposedly outsmart the casinos and their slot clubs. And no one ever has. It is a known fact that players have not and will never defeat the casinos at their own game of math.
It's no surprise that those who talk of beating the game with all their AP crap have never offered to prove anything publicly and always hide behind mathematical explanations as their crutch. It's also no coincidence that those who write books and sell the perfect strategy just are not able to retire from any of it no matter how old and hideous they get, because they are so addicted to the game and if they want to continue playing they have to continue selling. And if you notice how someone like Frank operates: secret teams who supposedly have always used casinos as their own personal ATM's? Come on. You actually believe casinos would ever allow TEAMS to descend upon them if they were consistently profitting off their progressives?
It's time to come to grips with what's been going on within the commercialized video poker world---something I've been preaching to the public since 2000. These people are nothing but addicts who continuously need to keep the fire of justification-for-playing lit. There is only one true way of winning at this game, and that is to properly prepare for it in your mind and your pocketbook, actually do it in the exact way I did it, then back up the claims of results to the naysayers, critics, disbelievers, and jealous name-callers with published challenges in Las Vegas that I could both prove what I've already won and prove I could win going forward with actual witnessed play. And guess why all the aforementioned phonies have never wanted any part of that!
So don't go believing all these desk jockies who hide behind theory instead of actually doing something. Why do you think an angry person such as arcimedes wastes so much time on all forums proclaiming how great AP's do and how bad I supposedly do? A guy like that not only can't shake the curse of playing--even in the midst of all the,sufferring going on around him. He spends every other waking moment on the forums trying to get a virtual vp fix by telling everyone they don't understand what they're talking about if they don't think like him.
Know this: there is no such thing as AP-winning without the same extraordinary luck anyone who wins has. And NO AP wins consistently. The writing has been and always will be on the wall right there in front of you all."
What surprises me is that Singer plays the optimal play 95% using SPS. He claims that when he was playing the optimal play for 100% he lost. Now becauce of making his special plays (5% of the time), long shots for luck, he made close to one million dollars. Oh and he banks some small wins at different levels of play. So he hit luck constantly for about 10 years. Did you also know he's wearing an S on his chest, underneath his clothes . Since SPS I believe Singer lost something else.......you figure out what it is.
"Come on Alan, you know how unforgiving video poker is. I lost as an "optimal play expert" when good pay tables & cash back were common, then I had a good run by understanding how important luck was to winning and taking maximum advantage of it.
No one beats this game consistently no matter how smart they make everyone think they are, how fast or flawlessly they claim to play, or how they supposedly outsmart the casinos and their slot clubs. And no one ever has. It is a known fact that players have not and will never defeat the casinos at their own game of math.
It's no surprise that those who talk of beating the game with all their AP crap have never offered to prove anything publicly and always hide behind mathematical explanations as their crutch. It's also no coincidence that those who write books and sell the perfect strategy just are not able to retire from any of it no matter how old and hideous they get, because they are so addicted to the game and if they want to continue playing they have to continue selling. And if you notice how someone like Frank operates: secret teams who supposedly have always used casinos as their own personal ATM's? Come on. You actually believe casinos would ever allow TEAMS to descend upon them if they were consistently profitting off their progressives?
It's time to come to grips with what's been going on within the commercialized video poker world---something I've been preaching to the public since 2000. These people are nothing but addicts who continuously need to keep the fire of justification-for-playing lit. There is only one true way of winning at this game, and that is to properly prepare for it in your mind and your pocketbook, actually do it in the exact way I did it, then back up the claims of results to the naysayers, critics, disbelievers, and jealous name-callers with published challenges in Las Vegas that I could both prove what I've already won and prove I could win going forward with actual witnessed play. And guess why all the aforementioned phonies have never wanted any part of that!
So don't go believing all these desk jockies who hide behind theory instead of actually doing something. Why do you think an angry person such as arcimedes wastes so much time on all forums proclaiming how great AP's do and how bad I supposedly do? A guy like that not only can't shake the curse of playing--even in the midst of all the,sufferring going on around him. He spends every other waking moment on the forums trying to get a virtual vp fix by telling everyone they don't understand what they're talking about if they don't think like him.
Know this: there is no such thing as AP-winning without the same extraordinary luck anyone who wins has. And NO AP wins consistently. The writing has been and always will be on the wall right there in front of you all."
What surprises me is that Singer plays the optimal play 95% using SPS. He claims that when he was playing the optimal play for 100% he lost. Now becauce of making his special plays (5% of the time), long shots for luck, he made close to one million dollars. Oh and he banks some small wins at different levels of play. So he hit luck constantly for about 10 years. Did you also know he's wearing an S on his chest, underneath his clothes . Since SPS I believe Singer lost something else.......you figure out what it is.
