Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

So many? You obviously didn't look at "the other forum" . What got posted here is just a small portion of the Singer insanity going on elsewhere.......And since it involves a number of people active in this thread........well, you get the picture.

nope, I haven't, and I am not likely to. But you are successfully getting at least part of Rob's message out to those who don't go to that forum. Or are these tidbits just designed to drive traffic to that 'other forum'?

Quite the contrary. Posting those tidbits here takes away "the need" to go to the other forum. Also just as a reminder for some to show and stipulate what kind of person Singer is.......before somebody (besides Money) actually starts to take anything Singer (Batman) or MoneyLa (Robin) says seriously...

I think Money and Singers relationship is more like Bags and Shar than Batman and Robin, but which one is Shar?

Now it goes off? You've been dealing with Singer so long that I didn't think you had a BS meter. How do you think the casinos make money? Do you think it's just luck? Or do you think they have a bevy of mathematicians as consultants analyzing the games to make sure they have a winning edge? Could it be that math is like gravity and only applies to some of us while others like you go floating off into space?

Auch!!!! But then again, I think you're right

Who's Shar in this picture.......That depends on who actually has one million dollars, Singer or MoneyLa.

I would like to go on record as saying I have also made money doing comedy sitting down.

After I've had a chance to discuss this Rob quote with Rob I'll comment on it...and no I don't think he's spreading lies about me. I think he believes what he says...and no it doesn't bother me. Rob's insight into why VP authors post is certainly one possible explanation. I have some extra info I'll share with him and then see what he thinks.

Cheers...

I thought this was a good post and it seems to have lost in the din. Here it is again with a little added...

Perhaps this is a non sequitur perhaps it is not. In the book I read recently "The Drunkards Walk" it referenced an interesting study done into human pattern recognition. Scientists set two buttons to give the subjects a reward if they pushed the correct button. Only one button at a time was enabled to give the reward, and they alternated which button was correct randomly with the left button being correct 75% of the time and the right button getting the remaining 25%.

Rats scored an average of 70% correct pushes, as they quickly learned that the left button was right more often.

ALL the Human test subjects tried to guess at the non-existent pattern, and NONE of them merely opted for always pushing the left button. The BEST any of the human test subjects did was around 55% correct. Similar tests have been conducted and in all cases rats and other non-primates like pigeons score better than humans. The problem would seem to be that humans perceive their pattern recognition as an "all the time asset" and can't switch it off when it's a deficit...like when there is no pattern.

Oh, in the primary test they did not tell the participants that the buttons alternated randomly. In a later re-test they did, but most of the subjects still refused to believe the scientists and continued to look for patterns even when they had been told there were none. Some of the subjects requested to be allowed to continue doing the test, because they felt they were close to figuring out the pattern. These subjects left convinced the scientists were wrong, and that there really was a pattern, even though their best scores had been beaten by the weakest rats.

If we have a hammer all problems become nails.

In another study scientists simply wanted to see if people could recognise series of random coin tosses. The error rate was about 80%. 78% of the non-random series were identified as random, and 82% of the truly random series were thought to be man made.

People almost perfectly perceive random events to be non-random and visa versa.

Frank, I actually didn't think you would be bothered by his statements. One of the problems I believe Singer has is exactly what you are saying. He actually believes what he is saying. And that's what's so sad about the man because a lot of the things he says are so far off they're hilarious at the same time.

He actually believes his "record breaking threads" are "record breaking" because of the interesting an valuable information he's sharing. Threads about him are "record breaking" because Singer is his own worst enemy. They are not "record breaking" in a good way. As soon as somebody says anything he doesn't like, he replies with personal attacks & insults. He goes out of his way to read everything that is said about him, replies to everything in a way as nasty as possible and at the same time he keeps reminding everybody he doesn't care what people say about him (and he actually believes he doesn't care).

Singer believes he is the most famous VP person out there. I believe he mistakes most famous with most hated and most ridiculed. He will claim that people say nasty things about him out of stupidity, ignorance and jealousy over his success (and he actually believes that). The arrogance he portrays in some of his posts is mind boggling (and the sad part is, he actually believes what he's saying) I believe people say nasty things about him because he's so easy to dislike/hate and look at him as "the village idiot of videopoker".

DonDiego believes Mr. Singer is the most famous Video poker person out there.