The new health care law, how's it working??

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: shlomo
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Are you referring to the US Constituion or the one that belonged to the Confederacy? State laws do not trump Federal laws in our book. If Massachusetts can demand people buy into a healthcare system so can the Federal government.


Wow, I really hope you aren't this stupid, and are only whooshing me.....

It's not a matter of which law trumps which, state vs federal. Massachusetts can do it because there's nothing stopping them from doing it, so to speak (unless something is in their own state constitution - I have no idea but I doubt it, since the law was implemented).

The federal government NEEDS TO HAVE SPECIFIC AUTHORITY to do something, granted by the Constitution. They can't just pass a law because they think it's a neat idea, or even if it makes perfect sense and the country would benefit.

Seriously, you and the other lefties on this board would greatly benefit from reading the actual constitution, especially the 10th Amendment. There is nothing in the constitution that gives the Federal Government the right to mandate commerce, interstate or otherwise. They only get to regulate commerce: and your assumption that regulation = compelling is a completely novel reading, and if upheld would completely eradicate any restraint on federal powers. That's something the framers would have hated, certainly.

The 10th Amendment says, basically, that if it's not in here, the Feds can't do it - the States make the call.

Which is why the Romneycare bill is legit, Obamacare ain't. Oh well, at least it resulted in giving the Democrats a complete assreaming, with another one to come, thanks to Pelosi/Obama/Reid shoving it down the public's throats.


Jefferson Davis could not have said it any better. The US Federal Government can pass any law it chooses so long as it does not violate the Constituion. If the south actually won the Civil War your premise would be correct and we would not have things like Medicare and Social Security...or even a national currency... but we do because, much to Senator Jim DeMint's displeasure, the north won the Civil War.


Oh dear, you *are* that clueless.

No, the Feds CAN NOT pass 'just any law'. You should get to know The 10th.

Quote

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.


This means that, unless the Constitution specifically grants the Feds a power, Congress cannot seize/act upon that power. This is a source of great misery to lefties, who look for an ever-growing Federal presence in the lives of Americans, I understand.


Nowhere does the Constitution say that the Federal Government is allowed to force citizens to engage in commerce. NOWHERE. Get this through your lefty head, please, you'll save yourself some embarrassment next time you talk about the issue. Or just pipe down about the subject and let the adults talk, either way.

No offense.
No offense taken. Your point is perfectly clear. The commerce forced upon me to buy Meidcare and Social Security insurance is all a figment of my imagination. Who should I contact to get all that money back?
Medicare & SS is a tax which the govt can do. The bill was written as requiring people to buy insurance, a huge difference! As mentioned by others by allowing the mandate opens the legal door for examplethat the Feds can require people to bu GM cars.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
No offense taken. Your point is perfectly clear. The commerce forced upon me to buy Meidcare and Social Security insurance is all a figment of my imagination. Who should I contact to get all that money back?


Try the Federal and state governments. They got around it by using other funds/programs as a way to get the states to come on board. Kinda like saying "I'll take your highway funding away if you don't agree to bill x". Happens all the time.

Yea, how about those 2 programs? Supposed to have their funds locked up and exactly how long are they fully funded for?????

I did forget, they are apart of that $75 trillion of unfunded debt we have to pay for.........

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
No offense taken. Your point is perfectly clear. The commerce forced upon me to buy Meidcare and Social Security insurance is all a figment of my imagination. Who should I contact to get all that money back?


That's not Commerce!!!
It is interesting that malliber thinks 6 insurance companies is a monopoly but the govt as the only provider is not.

For those that haven't noticed European govts are bankrupt, with one of the major reasons being nationalized health care
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
No offense taken. Your point is perfectly clear. The commerce forced upon me to buy Meidcare and Social Security insurance is all a figment of my imagination. Who should I contact to get all that money back?


As others have said, those are taxes, only paid by those with incomes. The Government is allowed to levy taxes as per the Constitution.

Let me give another example, honestly this may be helpful:

In United States v. Lopez 514 U.S. 549 (1995), a federal law mandating a "gun-free zone" on and around public school campuses was struck down because, the Supreme Court ruled, there was no clause in the Constitution authorizing it. This was the first modern Supreme Court opinion to limit the government's power under the Commerce Clause.

Now, surely most reasonable people would agree that it's a good idea to keep guns away from kids, and schools. Nobody here (at least, not me) disputes that. Congress attempted some trumped-up reasoning in passing this law, saying that good education is vital to a good economy, those schoolkids will eventually work in interstate industries, therefore the Commerce Clause (the power for Congress to regulate commerce between the states, which is the flimsy straw Obamacare's mandatory purchase requirement is based upon) theoretically allows Congress to pass this law.

The Supreme Court told Congress to go f*ck itself - that any reading of the Commerce Clause like that would basically remove all restrictions on Federal powers.

That's where we are with Obamacare. If it's allowed to stand, then the 10th Amendment is completely vitiated, and Constitutional protection might as well not exist, and federalism, as envisioned by the Founders (especially James Madison), will be destroyed. Hello Socialist Dystopia! (or, put another way, look at Greece and Italy: that's us in a few years).
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
It is interesting that malliber thinks 6 insurance companies is a monopoly but the govt as the only provider is not.

For those that haven't noticed European govts are bankrupt...
No they're not. The German economy, for example, is doing quite a bit better than we are. And how does healthcare bankrupt Europe anyway? They spend about 9% of their GDP on healthcare and cover everyone, we spend 16% and leave millions uncovered.

And our current limited single payer health insurance, Medicare, is not a monopoly. If anyone is foolish enough to prefer private insuarance, or to pay for their care with cash, they are free to do so.

Obviously, a single payer system like Medicare would have been preferable to the current law. Just ask Granny if she wants to give up her Medicare. Then ask Chef if he would like to be eligible for the same thing.

(And welcome back chefantwon!)
Quote

Originally posted by: forkush
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Obviously, a single payer system like Medicare would have been preferable to the current law. Just ask Granny if she wants to give up her Medicare. Then ask Chef if he would like to be eligible for the same thing.

(And welcome back chefantwon!)


Unfortunately, I'm about 17 years too young to hit the medicare system. Although I may have gotten nailed due to the root cause of the ulcer that got me into the hospital. I drank far too much beer over the years and it caught up with me.

Thanks Forkie.

Quote

Originally posted by: shlomo
Quote

Originally posted by: Number51
Quote

Originally posted by: shlomo

God, I wish liberals would read the constitution once in awhile...


Maybe a good conservative can teach the liberals about the Constitution.

"We believe that the preamble to the Constitution contains an inarguable truth that we are all endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, among them life. [Applause] Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness. [Applause]"

From Rush Limbaugh addressing CPAC (Conservative Political Action Committee) 2009 FOX News

One little problem, none of that is from the Constitution.


shlomo says: "God, I wish liberals would read the constitution once in awhile..."

Which one shlomo? The real Constitution, or the Limbaugh version?


Quick! Change the subject!

Lefty 1 to Lefty 2: "I know our plan is unconstitutional so quick let's tell a story about some guy we hate and get the poster to defend that guy, instead of focusing how liberals mostly don't have a fckn clue about what the proper role of the Federal Government is...."

Or did you plan to say something on topic here? If you're not able to address the issue, I completely understand. Look, I don't pretend to be any good at making lattes, I don't drive a VW or wear a beret, and I'd suck as an actor or theater critic. I'm not a lefty, right tool for the right job I say.


Conservative: "God, I wish liberals would read the constitution once in awhile..."
Liberal: "Here is what Conservative darling Rush Limbaugh thinks the Constitution says."
Conservative: "Quick! Change the subject! "

The conservative changed the subject, then says the Liberal did. Typical right wing opposite speak. The Liberal vs Conservative view of the Constitution was YOUR topic, sorry you don't like YOUR issue anymore.

Look I'm no Conservative, I don't date blood relatives, I'm not frightened by anyone different than me, and I'm sure I could never wear bed sheets or burn crosses. I'm not a right wing nut, I will leave those things to the experts.

To the slow folks out there, just a little taste of shlomo stereotyping for shlomo.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now