NFL players

I'm not trying to start an arguement but I looked it up on the California EDD website:

Professional Athlete Claims

A. General
Section 1253.4 of Calif. Unemp. Insurance Code provides:
Unemployment compensation benefits, extended duration benefits and federal-state extended benefits shall not be payable to any individual on the basis of any services, substantially all of which consist of participating in sports or athletic events or training or preparing to so participate, for any week which commences during the period between two successive sports seasons, or similar periods, if such individual performed such service in the first of such seasons, or similar periods, and there is reasonable assurance such individual will perform services in the later of such seasons, or similar periods.
Therefore, for the provisions of Section 1253.4 to be applicable, the following criteria must be present:
1. Substantially, all of the claimant’s services performed during the base period were as a sports participant, or training/preparing to participate.
2. The claimant performed "athletic" services in the prior season and is under contract to perform similar services in the succeeding season or has reasonable assurance of performing similar services the following season.
When an individual completes the season and his or her contract terminates, there is "reasonable assurance" so long as the individual affirmatively offers services as an athlete to the employer(s) and there is a strong indication that an employer(s) is intending to employ the individual.
Generally, the individual will be the best judge of whether he or she has a "reasonable assurance" of performing next season. Unless the individual’s assessment is inherently improbable, it will be accepted. For instance, a sports figure whose performance last season was outstanding is likely to have assurance of playing next season; any statement to the contrary should be examined closely.
3. Benefits are claimed for weeks commencing between successive sport seasons or similar periods in which the claimant will have performed as an athlete
The dates of the "season" and of the "recess" period should be confirmed with the claimant or the employer to verify that benefits are being claimed "between two successive sports seasons."

You might want to think about reading things before you post them.
Lol Bill.
Teachers who also have a scheduled off-season are not eligible for unemployment compensation, in California for sure, and I'm pretty sure in the rest of the country too.

I think the key word you missed is "not".
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
I think the key word you missed is "not".

That can be an important word when it comes to that legal stuff.

Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
J, you have it right on the head. We are the ones paying these fools and all they want is more money. If most of those folks were smart to hire someone who knew how to invest instead of one of their friends, maybe they might have something left when their playing time is done. The NFL is filled with stories of former players on the street because they were too dumb to invest all that money wisely.

The average fan pays upwards of $500 just to see a 3 hour game. Where are OUR rights? I would like to see a NFL game, but its more than likely I won't due to the outrageous cost of everything.



The average ticket price league-wide in 2009 was just over $75. SEVENTY FIVE dollars, not $500.
Few clubs increased their ticket prices last year, so the 2010 average won't be much higher.
The average NFL career lasts under three years and the majority of people who are NFL alumni have made under a million dollars in their football career.


The Giants are the only team in the NFL not to bill their season ticketholders during the strike. I am part of a 3 way split for the Jets & 2 of us have decided not to pay the money until they settle
Wellington Mara was the best owner in pro sports history, as far as I'm concerned. I don't believe he'd ever have sanctioned PSLs.
His children are trying to keep the Mara legacy going, but it's eroding year by year.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkush
Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
...We are the ones paying these fools and all they want is more money...
Oh, you must be referring to the owners. Because it's the owners - literally - who are holding out for more money. The players association and the owners negotiated an agreement a few years ago, and it's the owners who are now saying they had their fingers crossed while doing so. Hence a lockout, NOT strike.

The players association isn't asking for a penny more than the current agreement.


Of course leave it to forkie to take the socialistic view. Bullsh!t the players dont want a penny more, they want a WHOLE LOT more. They want the owners books opened and paid more if the owners make more on certain deals. I know its more complicated than that, but its how i perceive it.

J
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now