No classified emails on my server....yea right

When running out of ways to try and defend that which can't be defended any longer all that's left is attacking sources never the content. I guess I would have to give up at some point also.

People who cant rationalize their hatred with facts are very willing to embrace bullshit. Enter our resident Alex Jones disciples.....

who in their right mind could question the source for these gems ?!?!?!


Jphelan uses The Federalist to make a BS claim about Clinton Foundation's finances...7 pages of intelligent discussion !

Jatki heard Obama fudged the unemployment numbers and DonDIego provided a link from the NY Post to prove it

Boilerman uses Breitbart.com to slam dunk claims about Bengazhi.

Boilerman slanders a purdue scientist and misquotes him saying that Ebola is airborne

DonDiego strikes up an intelligent discussion about ACORN corruption as proven by a James O'Keefe YouTube video

On a thread packed with BS Hoops takes the trophy by saying some of the Paris attckers were Syrian refugees....and his source was ..ah...nothing. But who cares, right?


I actually felt my IQ drain a couple points reflecting on this little stroll down memory lane. Have fun going forward !

The Secretary of State of the USA is not a party planner or an advisor of protocol for the President's social gatherings. The Secretary of State is not only privy to, but instrumental in, the implementation of foreign relations. For anyone to suggest that those duties do not involve classified communications is ignorance. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton DID NOT have or use a secure .gov email account. ALL of her email communications were conducted on her own personal email server. She either had NO classified email communications of any kind during her tenure as Secretary of State, or she sent and received classified email on her personal email server. Only on that server.

I really don't understand why anyone thinks this doesn't matter. This is an attempted cover-up way beyond any other previous political scandal. The 2016 Democrat Presidential election frontrunner is a liar and a criminal. Two things that really suck about that.... It doesn't matter to the people who will still vote for her. It doesn't matter to her Democrat primary opponent. It would be three things, but Øbama's DOJ will protect her to the end, something to be expected.

You might be right. That was a really stupid statement.

Somebody needs a better hobby than keeping files on posters.

Another example of Forkie and PJ showing that they don't have much care of anything except when it comes from those Pulitzer Prize winning media giants like the Daily Kos and Huffington Post.

PJ - you make not like the Federalist as a resource, but I am not a big fan of the Huffington Post either.....

I stand by my statement:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I cannot image why anyone would donate money to a foundation when only 15% of the money goes to charitable causes. Can anyone think of a reason why someone would do this?

15% for Charity - 85% for me
ClintonFoundation - How Chelsea affords a $10 million home by the age of 35

Estimates of the Clinton's Net Worth are now approaching Mitt Romney's. I guess it pays to be a civil servant.

Ready for Hillary?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So how can Chelsea afford a $10 million home at age 35? And why can't you or I?

I'll bet that Chelsea's house owes it all to its 'foundation'.

You cite me in one of your little accusations of not providing a link or source. For one thing, there was no link to provide, I CLEARLY SAID"I HEARD ON CNBC" this morning... How in the world am I supposed to link that? Or are you accusing me of just plain making it up and lying? I sincerely hope you're not accusing me of either, you certainly know me better than that. I may be a lot of things, but I'm neither a thief or a liar, I despise both.

Why Hoops never provides a link is beyond me especially as much shit as you've given him over the years. I do know a lot of things he says is true, but instead of trying to discuss the point(s) (even if it is mainstream news), you just attack him and lack of "source" and toss it aside with no acknowledgement of truth whatsoever, and usually with some inane bigfoot Enquire pic.

That's as bad as Forky dismissing my claim on Gruber calling the American public stupid, all because I happen to link to a source (town hall.com) that was the first google hit, he immediately attacked and dismissed all 'cause he didn't like the source. And worse, he also completely misrepresented an article out of there claiming, "Obama, first gay president" when in fact they were equating Obama with gay rights, it was complimentary.

I happened to repeat my claim earlier in this thread and of course ..no Forky. See how ridiculous it can be to immediately trash what someone says, all because you think the source is unreliable? Sure ,if something is linked to the National enquirer, as you like to do, of course reject it, but if it's something that is out in the mainstream media, it shouldn't be brushed aside all because you don't care for the source.

But back to your reference to me, I'll repeat, I clearly said I HEARD it on CNBC that morning, which of course I did and relayed it here.

Is PJ arguing that the FBI has, in fact, not found 999 classified emails on Hillary's private server? I don't have a fucking clue what your argument is.