Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

NOAA lies about supposed climate change

Don
Don
Feb 9, 2017
2:50am
Block User
Poor old DonDiego had been a'hopin' that Tomato Ranch Ridge up heh' in Appalachia might've become ocean-front property, . . . or even his own private island, . . . by now.

Them NOAA bastards lied !
IndyBoilerman
IndyBoilerman
Feb 9, 2017
3:30am
Block User
PJ, please watch this Fox interview with Dr. David Sanders. I posted this during the Ebola breakout. Sanders has experienced airborne transmission of Ebola in the lab, as I also stated during the Ebola breakout.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/3840172448001/?#sp=show-clips



Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
Sorry, but PJ has a bad memory. Did Dr. David Sanders not say that he experienced an airborne transfer of Ebola in the lab? Did Dr. David Sanders not claim that there should be concern that a mutation of a current strain could go airborne? The answer is yes and yes. I posted several articles addressing exactly this.

Let's get this issue addressed, and then we'll move onto the next issue.


Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
PJ, since you keep bringing up the Ebola, here is the bio of the scientist that I quoted. I've posted his credentials many times and many times you failed to address this. Also, I've linked to studies where this scientist has experienced airborne transmission of Ebola in the lab. You never addressed this.



Sure I did. And I'll do it again now. He's a completely credible scientist with a load of integrity. The issue was never with what he said....it was with your false presentation of his position. He never once said Ebola was airborne. But that's how you characterized hs position.

Just like you're now saying a NOLA scientist is blowing the whistle on his lying friends.

I hope for your sake neither scientist is a member of LVA. That might read your posts and sue you.


pjstroh
pjstroh
Feb 9, 2017
3:44am
Block User
I posted the same interview 3 years ago. Dr Sanders specifically says that the current strain of Ebola is not airbourne but warns that because it is a virus it can mutate and potentially someday become airborne.

This was the thread you started the following day..... "A Purdue Scientist today stated that Ebola can, in fact, be transmitted via airborne channels."

No he didn't. have a wonderful and alternative-fact free day!


(ps - this thread is mandatory reading for anyone who wants to see LV Conservatives in full blown panic mode over the imminent destruction of the planet due to Obama's incompetency. When this blew over they quickly moved onto Bengazhi)
IndyBoilerman
IndyBoilerman
Feb 9, 2017
4:00am
Block User
What in the world did I ever claim that was different than Dr. David Sanders said? Nothing.

Okay, back to the original topic. Please send you link proving that the NOAA scientist disagrees with the claims that Power Line posted. Your link didn't work, and I did a Google search to find such information, and I couldn't find anything.


Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
I posted the same interview 3 years ago. Dr Sanders specifically says that the current strain of Ebola is not airbourne but warns that because it is a virus it can mutate and potentially someday become airborne.

This was the thread you started the following day..... "A Purdue Scientist today stated that Ebola can, in fact, be transmitted via airborne channels."

No he didn't. have a wonderful and alternative-fact free day!


(ps - this thread is mandatory reading for anyone who wants to see LV Conservatives in full blown panic mode over the imminent destruction of the planet due to Obama's incompetency. When this blew over they quickly moved onto Bengazhi)



pjstroh
pjstroh
Feb 9, 2017
4:08am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
What in the world did I ever claim that was different than Dr. David Sanders said? Nothing.


I put it in quotes in my last post.


Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman

Okay, back to the original topic. Please send you link proving that the NOAA scientist disagrees with the claims that Power Line posted. Your link didn't work, and I did a Google search to find such information, and I couldn't find anything.



I fixed my link in my original post.


Have a great day!

IndyBoilerman
IndyBoilerman
Feb 9, 2017
4:20am
Block User
Apparently PJ and I are watching different videos.


Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
What in the world did I ever claim that was different than Dr. David Sanders said? Nothing.


I put it in quotes in my last post.


Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman

Okay, back to the original topic. Please send you link proving that the NOAA scientist disagrees with the claims that Power Line posted. Your link didn't work, and I did a Google search to find such information, and I couldn't find anything.



I fixed my link in my original post.


Have a great day!


IndyBoilerman
IndyBoilerman
Feb 14, 2017
11:51pm
Block User
I'm confused by your accusation. Are you claiming that the whistleblower, John Bates (Previously with NOAA) has claimed that Power Lines inaccurately quoted him? If that's the case, your reactivated link mentions nothing of the sort.

These NOAA hacks have ocean buoys to measure water temp, they have satellites to measure water temps, and they have ocean going vessel bilge tanks to measure water temps. Everyone, including NOAA, understands that the most unreliable data is the ship data. However, when the buoys didn't show warming, they checked the satellite data. When the satellite data didn't show warming, these hacks utilized the terribly suspect tanker data.

These unethical hacks are now ready to bring in more unethical hacks to review their science. Remember when the State Department brought in Hillary lovers to investigate Hillary?

Unless I missed something, your link adds nothing. Trump will assure that a true and honest investigation is done.




Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Remember when Boilerman used a blogger to libel a scientist and told us Ebola was airborne? Its deja vu all over again!
Whistleblower blows whistle on hacks that libeled him

The scientist at the heart of Boilerman's accusation says if anything the NOAA report understates the effect and pace of climate change. His objections to the report surrounded protocols and timing used by the original reporting. So Boilerman's blogger reporting from his mom's basement was making up shit, misquoting a scientist, and selling it as truth. And Boilerman bought it....again.

This is the new world we live in. Republicans invent their own alternative universe of bullshit and make policy accordingly.


IndyBoilerman
IndyBoilerman
Feb 15, 2017
12:11am
Block User
Even the Washington Times addresses the Karl Study which was presented in Paris, and the fact that there is zero archived data to back up the report. My Ex-wife is a research biochemist at Eli Lilly, and I've understood since 1983 that all pure research projects absolutely must present all data sources when requested. These hacks present a paper at an international summit, and they have no supporting documentation?

Some on people, this is silly.

Article
pjstroh
pjstroh
Feb 15, 2017
1:23am
Block User
From my link....
The result, he wrote, “strongly suggests that NOAA got it right and that we have been underestimating ocean warming in recent years.”

“The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data,” he said, “but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was.”


So what Climate Change data is the NOAA lying about (the claim you made in your original post)? Your own witness thinks your claim is bogus. have an alternative-fact free day!
krajewski.sa
krajewski.sa
Feb 15, 2017
1:41am
Block User
Just curious why you girls are arguing about this. Why not just go to:

https://nas-sites.org/americasclimatechoices/

The National Academy of Science is pretty respected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Academy_of_Sciences

These are the smartest men and women on the planet. You can get your science at church or on fox news if you prefer, but I wouldn't advise it. Everything else is non-sense, politics and noise making. Why waste your lives sniping at each other when you could get smarter by simply reading an authoritative source?
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now