NOAA lies about supposed climate change

Because your source comes from uninformed scientists instead of omniscient bloggers. Get with the program.

They didn't tamper with data, but instead knowingly utilized unreliable data over reliable data. This isn't tampering, but instead it's "cherry picking". It's certainly not science.

Power line is in the top 6,000 blogs, according to Alexander. How much more cred does one need?

Krajewski misses the point. The entire discussion centers around who are the reliable, unbiased sources. PJ argues that NOAA, for example, is a reliable and definitive source. On the other hand, I argue that NOAA, and most of these organizations that you mention, have great monetary motivations to lie about their results. No warming equals no funding equals no job. In addition, what about the concept of losing face after making shit up for years?

Either way, Ski, you fully missed the point of the discussion.

Oh, I don't think Ski missed anything.

That's because Snidely misses the point. Besides, it'd be best if you let others do the thinking.

What boils doesn't understand is NOAA is a front for the NSA and their fleet is made up mostly of spy ships that use scientific research as a cover.
They don't have budget concerns.

I didn't miss the point.

You're not doing any thinking. You're just parroting things others have written that you agree with politically and trying to pass that off as scientific thinking. You're attacking the NOAA's scientific neutrality because their conclusions don't match your politics.

And now you've found some blog that states what you want to think and say more eloquently than you can.

Thanks, Archie.

Boilerman has gone from misrepresenting an NOAA scientist to now just inventing an alternate universe. The NOAA has been around since Richard Nixon....long before any consensus or real study of Global warming. They are part of the deptarment of Commerce and have served under president's from both parties - including ones that are not favorable to their conclusions.

They get paid regardless. But Boilerman is trying to say their funding depends on their findings? That's pure, fabricated bullshit. And it also presumes the scientists from the rest of the world community are part of the same conspiracy.


It's true there a lot of people who make shit up. You'll find a higher ratio of those types on this site than in the NOAA. Have a great day