North Carolina Republican Senator Fights to keep State Straight

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
The worst of all these is the Pedophile Denny Hastert. Of course he committed these horrible acts while a Public School Teacher and Teacher's Union member. Seems if we're going to lump all Republican Men into the pervert category, we might as well add all School Teachers and Then Union Members too. Let's not forget he was born, raised and worked in Illinois. That would make the entire state suspect. And don't get me going on the mostly Democrat Roman Catholic Priests....They're the worst of the lot.
Oh you forgot mammals and multi-cellular organisms.

But here's the thing. Public school teachers aren't known for condemning the sexual activity of others. Neither are union members. And neither are citizens of Illinois, mammals, or multi-cellular organisms.

But Republicans like Denny Hastert are known for judging and legislating against the sexual behavior of others. That's what makes the Republican part of his bio so special.

I would have thought that would be obvious.
Right. It's not like Public School Teachers or Catholic Priests should have morals...
Wow, that's incredibly dishonest, even by your standards. Having morals is not the same as being a scolding moralist. Frequently it's the opposite, isn't it?

Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote books about moralists without morals. They were called Pharisees.
Have you completely lost touch with reality? Are you really claiming Catholic Priests aren't moralists?...
No I'm not. I was simply pointing out that there is a difference between having morals and being a scolding moralist. Anyone who conflates the two is dishonest. Now go look in the mirror.
You're arguing that it's somehow morally worse when a Republican politician rapes a child because they are "scolding moralists". Well pardon me for not seeing the difference between that and the morally depraved Catholic Priests and Public School Teachers who are serial pedophiles. I'm sure their victims take some relief in the fact that their abusers weren't 'scolding moralists'.

But as long as you and your ilk feel the need to parse the difference between having morals and being a scolding moralist you ignore the victim and the real crime....which is child molestation...not the fake aura of morality the perpetrators try to convey. Anyone who for political gain tries to somehow make child molestation better or worse based on the politics of the perpetrator is lower than low. And you can look in the mirror for that one.
I would suggest to you Alan the Republican party has an institutional problem with child molesters just like the Catholic Church did that goes beyond one individual. Furthermore, Hastert wasn’t just any old Republican member of the legislature. He was the leader selected by all other Republican House members to represent them as a whole, and he did so for eight years.

His successor and someone that is still considered a Republican hero, Tom DeLay, had this to say on the record to the court after he found out Hastert had molested the children:
He has never disappointed me in any way. He is a man of strong faith that guides him. He is a man of great integrity.

Several other Republican Party luminaires including Thomas Ewing, David Dreier, Porter Goss, and John Doolittle also sent letters to the court praising Hastert after it was known he molested children. If this bizarre and very public praise of a serial child molester isn’t indicative of an institutional problem I don’t know what is.
Toss a bone to a pack of dogs, and they'll fight over the bone, and not a one of them will realize that there's not a scrap of meat on it.
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
I would suggest to you Alan the Republican party has institutional problem with child molesters just like the Catholic Church did that goes beyond one individual. .
I hope you're wrong about that. Now if you said 'assholes' instead of 'child molesters', then I might agree with you.


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Have you completely lost touch with reality? Are you really claiming Catholic Priests aren't moralists? Dude, that's part of their job description. Perhaps you should try scheduling a gay wedding in a Catholic Church.


Which makes it that much more egregious when a priest F@cks an altar boy. Your comparison of the Catholic church and Evangelical leaders in Congress is dead-on-balls accurate. Pun intended.

And Public School teachers aren't known for preaching against the gay community. Anyone who does likely will lose their job in most districts.


Hence that's probably why they wouldn't say anything about any politically correct topic, for or against, it would raise a shit storm. Oh and probably get them fired as well.
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
I would suggest to you Alan the Republican party has institutional problem with child molesters just like the Catholic Church did that goes beyond one individual. Furthermore, Hastert wasn’t just any old Republican member of the legislature. He was the leader selected by all other Republican House members to represent them as a whole, and he did so for eight years.

His successor and someone that is still considered a Republican hero, Tom DeLay, had this to say on the record to the court after he found out Hastert had molested the children:
He has never disappointed me in any way. He is a man of strong faith that guides him. He is a man of great integrity.

Several other Republican Party luminaires including Thomas Ewing, David Dreier, Porter Goss, and John Doolittle also sent letters to the court praising Hastert after it was known he molested children. If this bizarre and very public praise of a serial child molester isn’t indicative of an institutional problem I don’t know what is.


"Hastert wasn’t just any old Republican member of the legislature. He was the leader selected by all other Republican House members to represent them as a whole, and he did so for eight years."

HUH? when he committed these horrible acts he wasn't anything but a high school wrestling coach at the time, he didn't have anything to do with politics back then, yet you and all the other leftys went to equate him as the house speaker kiddy molester AND throw the entire party under the bus with him. How lame. There's bad guys (and girls) in every walk of life, career's et al. But you are the absolute first in line, well forky usually too, who want to equate all the major evils of life attached to the Rep.party.
A murder is a murder and a rape is a rape. Adding hypocrisy to the mix is quite insignificant.


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Have you completely lost touch with reality? Are you really claiming Catholic Priests aren't moralists? Dude, that's part of their job description. Perhaps you should try scheduling a gay wedding in a Catholic Church.


Which makes it that much more egregious when a priest F@cks an altar boy. Your comparison of the Catholic church and Evangelical leaders in Congress is dead-on-balls accurate. Pun intended.

And Public School teachers aren't known for preaching against the gay community. Anyone who does likely will lose their job in most districts.


Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now