Not Guilty! Wow

Quote

Originally posted by: INdianapaddler
Quote

Originally posted by: curtis39
Well Indiana let's see how you feel about "vigilantes" when it's YOUR ass that's been attacked.


I don't know what the f*** you mean by this post, Curtis, but the vigilantes will have to say hello to my little friend first before they get to me.


You wouldn't dare shoot anyone since it would violate their Civil Rights. Inviting them to have a beverage and then hugging it out would be a more likely scenario for you.
Shooting a person only violates his/her civil rights if you have one of the specified relationships with that person.

For example, Person A is on her way to Court to get a restraining order, when Person B shoots Person A. This would not be a violation of Person A's civil rights, except in narrow circumstances. Even the killing of Lee Harvey Oswald may not have been a violation of his civil rights (depending on the exact circumstances re. Jack Ruby).

The most common form for an allegation of a civil rights violation is against a peace officer. This is because peace officers have a duty to protect the public. The existence of this duty is critical to the allegation.
My real concern will be when it gets reported that this murderer is pregnant again.
She's thinking about adoption because of all the children out there that need LOVE !!!

They should sew that damn thing up before she leaves the jail!

She doesnt need to have any more kids!
Quote

Originally posted by: drmilled
My real concern will be when it gets reported that this murderer is pregnant again.


LOL,I just saw the front page of nat enq. today at the market that she was preggers.

J
Quote

Originally posted by: alexlifeson
Quote

Originally posted by: INdianapaddler
Quote

Originally posted by: curtis39
Well Indiana let's see how you feel about "vigilantes" when it's YOUR ass that's been attacked.


I don't know what the f*** you mean by this post, Curtis, but the vigilantes will have to say hello to my little friend first before they get to me.


You wouldn't dare shoot anyone since it would violate their Civil Rights. Inviting them to have a beverage and then hugging it out would be a more likely scenario for you.


You know absolutely nothing about me, yet you make a comment like this?

Well, let me reciprocate. From what I have seen of your postings, you will shoot first and ask questions later "Oh, but I thought the cell phone was a gun!"

Here is the other thing about this. If law enforcement wouldn’t have been so eager to charge her she probably would have ended up incriminating herself at some point down the road.
I heard a rumor there are child porn pics of the little girl.
There was an interesting article on this in the Detroit Free Press just after the jury rendered its decision.

The article's point was that if Nancy Grace and the rest like her hadn't been on TV every night obsessing about Casey Anthony, she would never have had the caliber of legal representation that she had at the trial.

In all likelihood, she would have had to make due with a court appointed lawyer, plead guilty to manslaughter and spent 30 years in jail. Nancy can be pissed off if she wants, but I think the Free Press makes a valid point.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now