The Obama Internet

I'll ask again. HOW CAN ANYONE HERE STATE WHAT IS IN THE PLAN WHEN THE FCC WON'T REVEAL ITS CONTENTS UNTIL AFTER THEY VOTE ON IT?

ObeyMe was all for FCC regulations transparency concerning changes to the regulations when he was a Senator. What changed?

Notwithstanding these efforts, many Members of Congress argued the Commission should be even more transparent. At a September 2007 public hearing in Chicago, Senator Obama submitted a statement that he “strongly requested” the FCC “put out any changes that they intend to vote on in a new notice of proposed rulemaking.” A month later, in a letter to Chairman Martin, Senator Obama argued that both the “proposed timeline and process are irresponsible.” He specifically noted while a certain proposal “may pass the muster of a federal court, Congress and the public have the right to review any specific proposal and decide whether or not it constitutes sound policy. And the commission has the responsibility to defend any new proposal in public discourse and debate. The following month Senator Obama cosponsored bipartisan legislation to block the Commission’s vote on the rulemaking, pursuant to a 90-day comment period.

Source
This is what happens when a man has no core values.


Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
I'll ask again. HOW CAN ANYONE HERE STATE WHAT IS IN THE PLAN WHEN THE FCC WON'T REVEAL ITS CONTENTS UNTIL AFTER THEY VOTE ON IT?

ObeyMe was all for FCC regulations transparency concerning changes to the regulations when he was a Senator. What changed?

Notwithstanding these efforts, many Members of Congress argued the Commission should be even more transparent. At a September 2007 public hearing in Chicago, Senator Obama submitted a statement that he “strongly requested” the FCC “put out any changes that they intend to vote on in a new notice of proposed rulemaking.” A month later, in a letter to Chairman Martin, Senator Obama argued that both the “proposed timeline and process are irresponsible.” He specifically noted while a certain proposal “may pass the muster of a federal court, Congress and the public have the right to review any specific proposal and decide whether or not it constitutes sound policy. And the commission has the responsibility to defend any new proposal in public discourse and debate. The following month Senator Obama cosponsored bipartisan legislation to block the Commission’s vote on the rulemaking, pursuant to a 90-day comment period.

Source


Remember when he promised the most transparent administration in history. Another obma lie
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy

And again every one of those horrible infringements on hopeless consumers was resolved without reclassifying ISP's to be ruled like telephone companies. Tempest in a teapot and a poor excuse to bring thousands of businesses under the thumb of the FCC. Maybe it's time Congress clarifies the intent of the Federal Communications Act of 1934. A lot has changed since 1934.


Right on. Netflix formed a "business partnership" with the company that shook them down for millions of dollars in cash. I need to remember that line if I ever rob a bank.

And "life under the thumb" of the FCC has really made the telephone business non-competitive and awful for consumers, hasn't it. Which one of the 30 carriers does Alan get his phone service from?

Ddn't the Feds originally think the AT&T monopoly a good thing?
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
And "life under the thumb" of the FCC has really made the telephone business non-competitive and awful for consumers, hasn't it.

That only took an act of congress and a President who was willing to reverse a 50 year course to partly deregulate Telecoms and Airlines. PJ cites the benefits of deregulation from one side of his mouth while singing the praises of increased regulations from the other.

Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
I'll ask again. HOW CAN ANYONE HERE STATE WHAT IS IN THE PLAN WHEN THE FCC WON'T REVEAL ITS CONTENTS UNTIL AFTER THEY VOTE ON IT?
Anyone who doesn't know what is in the plan is incapable of reading a newspaper.

Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Remember when he promised the most transparent administration in history. Another obma lie
Other presidential administrations have been more transparent? Name one.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Remember when he promised the most transparent administration in history. Another obma lie
Other presidential administrations have been more transparent? Name one.


He campaigned on being the most transparent admiinistration ever & it isn't.
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
And "life under the thumb" of the FCC has really made the telephone business non-competitive and awful for consumers, hasn't it.

That only took an act of congress and a President who was willing to reverse a 50 year course to partly deregulate Telecoms and Airlines. PJ cites the benefits of deregulation from one side of his mouth while singing the praises of increased regulations from the other.


Not once have I ever showed concern that ISP's might be governed like a telephone company. Quite the oppossite. But guess who did show that concern? Ring a bell? (pun intended)
" And again every one of those horrible infringements on hopeless consumers was resolved without reclassifying ISP's to be ruled like telephone companies. "

You cant keep your own argument straight for more than 2 posts. One minute I'm talking to Norman - and the next minute I'm talking to mother.

I guess I cant get the time I spent posting on this thread back. Oh well - live and learn.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now