Will there be WalMart greeters for the political prisoners?
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Well if he doesn't first have someone like General Betty responsible for monitoring the exercises how in the fuck do you expect him to communicate anything to anyone?
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyQuote
Originally posted by: pjstrohQuote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Obama and friends have proved to be liars, and once a liar always a liar. There is zero logical reason to trust anything coming from the White House. While this doesn't mean that everything coming from the White House is a lie, it does mean that everything coming from the White House must be considered as a possible lie.
Bravo! See? being honest isn't so hard.
This is all simply an exercise in Obama paranoia....like this thread's author originally stated.
I surprised you didn't add in the 'Because he is black'...Like this thread's author also stated.
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstrohQuote
Originally posted by: alanleroyQuote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
I say this:
"Deploying state guard to monitor the federal exercise" is not synonymous with "communicating with people about the exercise".
AlanLeroy and the governor say this:Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
"Directing the State Guard to monitor the Operation will allow Texas to be informed of the details of military personnel movements and training exercise schedules, and it will give us the ability to quickly and effectively communicate with local communities, law enforcement, public safety personnel and citizens."
This looks like pretty plain English to me. .
We clearly speak different dialects of English.
Well if he doesn't first have someone like General Betty responsible for monitoring the exercises how in the fuck do you expect him to communicate anything to anyone?
And 'monitoring' doesn't mean he is 'deploying' thousands of troops to follow the military around. At least it doesn't mean that in my dialect of English. It more likely means establishing lines of communication.
PJ's just mad that he doesn't know how the State of Texas will communicate to it's citizens. I just assume they know how to do that fine.
Well, lets keep an eye out, Alan. Maybe we can see "how in the fuck" the governor will communicate going forward. (Just a thought - maybe he could "in the fuck" ask the Pentagon instead of deploying his own army to spy on the nefarious Federal government....unless he has a paranoid reason not to believe the Pentagon). ANd maybe I'll ask the Nevada State guard about hotel prices for my next Vegas trip instead of asking Hotels.com. Ya know - just to be safe.
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyQuote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
There is no 1-800-number Texas people can call to see how the military's exercise will impact their local neighborhood with any specifics as ALanLeroy would suggest earlier. The state's role is to accommodate paranoid birthers who get their information from paranoid AM radio programs in the state...and reassure them that the Texas guard is watching the evil US military. (IE) They can re-assure callersWal*MArt is still safe to shop at. They cant inform callers if a tank is running through their neighborhood today.
How does pj know what 'information' the State of Texas is planning to 'provide citizens who have questions'?
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
I say this:
"Deploying state guard to monitor the federal exercise" is not synonymous with "communicating with people about the exercise".
AlanLeroy and the governor say this:Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
"Directing the State Guard to monitor the Operation will allow Texas to be informed of the details of military personnel movements and training exercise schedules, and it will give us the ability to quickly and effectively communicate with local communities, law enforcement, public safety personnel and citizens."
This looks like pretty plain English to me. .
We clearly speak different dialects of English.
