Obama Planning to invade Texas and turn WalMarts into FEMA Camps

Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Yeah PJ, you're off your game on this one. You usually do your religion good service but you lost this time. Even Forky isn't helping you out...
Oh, I think PJ nailed it when he said:

"I sure hope local police departments send out a force to monitor the state troops to make sure people are safe.

Because local police departments are NEVER tasked with monitoring state troops to protect "civil liberties," and state troops are NEVER tasked with monitoring federal troops to protect "civil liberties." Can anyone name one time it's been done in American history? I mean other than that Fort Sumter thing.

It's deeply paranoid, un-American, and disgraceful. Likewise, the people who defend it.
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Yeah PJ, you're off your game on this one. You usually do your religion good service but you lost this time. Even Forky isn't helping you out.

There are some bat shit crazy people out there, that's for sure, but the majority of the folks in this matter are doing what they should be doing. Its every citizens job to keep tabs on the government. If everyone did we would have a much more functional government no matter which way it leaned. If every citizen were as concerned as the people in that video we could dismiss the nut jobs while at the same time eliminate the corruption that is so rampant in our government.


You know I would agree with you to a certain extent, but given our recent history the behavior is downright bizarre.

We let our last President trick is into a war that ended up costing 6 trillion dollars by all estimates. They said it would be a "cake walk." They said take our word for it we have seen classified things you haven't. They told us we couldn't wait for the evidence of a mushroom cloud coming in. If people disagreed or simply wanted some evidence what they said was true they were called traitors. It was a "you are either with or against us" mentality.

Now these same yokels that were cheerleaders for that disaster are insisting they are entitled to be briefed on every aspect of a military training exercise. Sure it doesn't have anything to do with race.


Nobody got "tricked" into a war. This country was reeling from 9/11, the worst ever terrorists' attack on US soil. I watched and the world watched people jumpimng from the towers until they eventually fell. True it seemed like invading Iraq would be a cakewalk when looking back at how easy desert storm was, hell we didn't even lose any men to enemy fire did we? Any sitting pres. was going to react, the majority of the country wanted blood for lack of a better term.I'm pretty sure Clinton would've. Obama? I dunno, he would probably use some of his diplomatic prowess to try and resolve the situation{sarc}. Anyhoo, beside the point.
Also, it's completely laughable you bitch about 6 trillion dollars when Obama has added(and still adding) to our national debt? Give you hint, it's more than 12 bucks.. Remember his little speech as a sen.? I'll refresh your memory.

'The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government can not pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance

from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that "the buck stops here." Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.'

Read more at https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/debtlimit.asp#dTfmu35xeEveObgT.99

How about all those "shovel ready" jobs that cost I think 800 mil. Meanwhile the infrastructure is still crumbling and the man himself laughed once when shovel ready jobs was brought up.So don't even complain about what seems a paltry 6 billion now.
I'd also like to know what the hell is up with this thing about wal mart and secret tunnels or whatever, I'd really like to read wherever it was you got that. Do you really think there's people out there who are believing that? I watched part of that town hall meeting, I sure didn't hear anyone bring up anything about secret tunnels, not even wal mart. Oh no Chinese soldiers either. Sounds to me like you're the only who thinks others believe something that absurd. Well, there's probably a few radical militant trypes who might, but it sure as hell doubt it's the mainstream thinking.
Cowboy put very well and it was even English AND very articulate, you should go read it again Mal.


BTWI'm serious, I'd love to see the article or whatever about secret tunnels, Chinese soldier and wal mart, post a link please, even if it is the daily kos or huff post.

ADDED LAST MIN.I was just rereading and I found your closing lines interesting,
"Now these same yokels that were cheerleaders for that disaster are insisting they are entitled to be briefed on every aspect of a military training exercise. Sure it doesn't have anything to do with race."

You bitch about your unwanted war and the "secrecy" about the reasons,now the US military wants to do a massive, multi-state "exercise and people (US citizens) want to know whats going on. Whoever said anything about "every aspect" of what's going on, I didn't get that from the TH meeting at all. Wouldn't you be a little freaked out if you came across a bunch of troops rolling on the outskirts of your town? wouldn't you want to know what the hell was going on? I know I would but then again maybe I watched Red Dawn too many times

I'm also curious why you switched your thinking on the race of the pres as the reason some are concerned about this exercise..?

I would still want to know tho.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Yeah PJ, you're off your game on this one. You usually do your religion good service but you lost this time. Even Forky isn't helping you out...
Oh, I think PJ nailed it when he said:

"I sure hope local police departments send out a force to monitor the state troops to make sure people are safe.

Because local police departments are NEVER tasked with monitoring state troops to protect "civil liberties," and state troops are NEVER tasked with monitoring federal troops to protect "civil liberties." Can anyone name one time it's been done in American history? I mean other than that Fort Sumter thing.

It's deeply paranoid, un-American, and disgraceful. Likewise, the people who defend it.



Really? That nails it? nails what? Nothing, nothing whatsoever.PJ makes somewhat of a snide comment about sending out local cops? and that "nails it"? Whoever said anything remotely about that? Hmmm..that would nobody.

And yes, I got the "gist" of what he was saying, so find a different insult, that's all your last posts have been, reaching a bit now forkie?

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Yeah PJ, you're off your game on this one. You usually do your religion good service but you lost this time. Even Forky isn't helping you out...
Oh, I think PJ nailed it when he said:

"I sure hope local police departments send out a force to monitor the state troops to make sure people are safe.

Because local police departments are NEVER tasked with monitoring state troops to protect "civil liberties," and state troops are NEVER tasked with monitoring federal troops to protect "civil liberties." Can anyone name one time it's been done in American history? I mean other than that Fort Sumter thing.

It's deeply paranoid, un-American, and disgraceful. Likewise, the people who defend it.


Because no State Guard ever 'facilitates communication' between the Governor and commanders of US Military operations in their state. In the history of Ever. Communication is so un-American.

Many people of Texas obviously have concerns and questions about the exercises. Some of those concerns are inspired by crazy radio personalities and web sites. The Governor reassuring the people and "addressing their concerns and ensuring that Texas communities remain safe, secure and informed about military procedures occurring in their vicinity" is hardly paranoid, un-American or disgraceful. The crazy bloggers making up that shit are.

It's too bad some can't tell the difference between the two....I expect they can but would rather portray their political opposition as "deeply paranoid, un-American, and disgraceful". than "concerned about the safety of the operation". Abbott's big mistake was he should have denounced the false narratives when he asked the Texas Guard to help facilitate communication.

The Governor is just trying to put put a lid on it. He's not contributing to the paranoia....he's trying to eliminate it.....because well..he recognizes "Texas' long history of supporting our military forces and our proud tradition of training, deploying and supporting our active-duty troops and returning veterans." How un-American.

Oh...and OMG.... if the mayor of some town appoints the chief of police to open communication lines with the State Guard to improve coordination and communication about any of their exercises how incredibly unpatriotic and disgusting that would be.










Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Yeah PJ, you're off your game on this one. You usually do your religion good service but you lost this time. Even Forky isn't helping you out...
Oh, I think PJ nailed it when he said:

"I sure hope local police departments send out a force to monitor the state troops to make sure people are safe.

Because local police departments are NEVER tasked with monitoring state troops to protect "civil liberties," and state troops are NEVER tasked with monitoring federal troops to protect "civil liberties." Can anyone name one time it's been done in American history? I mean other than that Fort Sumter thing.

It's deeply paranoid, un-American, and disgraceful. Likewise, the people who defend it.


Because no State Guard ever 'facilitates communication' between the Governor and commanders of US Military operations in their state. In the history of Ever...
Psst, PJ, from now on let's MONITOR what alanleroy has to say. Maybe we should get a group together to MONITOR him. And if he asks what we are doing, we'll just say that we are...wait for it...facilitating communication!

And there are people here dumb enough to believe it.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Yeah PJ, you're off your game on this one. You usually do your religion good service but you lost this time. Even Forky isn't helping you out...
Oh, I think PJ nailed it when he said:

"I sure hope local police departments send out a force to monitor the state troops to make sure people are safe.

Because local police departments are NEVER tasked with monitoring state troops to protect "civil liberties," and state troops are NEVER tasked with monitoring federal troops to protect "civil liberties." Can anyone name one time it's been done in American history? I mean other than that Fort Sumter thing.

It's deeply paranoid, un-American, and disgraceful. Likewise, the people who defend it.


Because no State Guard ever 'facilitates communication' between the Governor and commanders of US Military operations in their state. In the history of Ever...
Psst, PJ, from now on let's MONITOR what alanleroy has to say. Maybe we should get a group together to MONITOR him. And if he asks what we are doing, we'll just say that we are...wait for it...facilitating communication!

And there are people here dumb enough to believe it.

Yeah sure. Like you disgraceful anti-AlanLeroy paranoids don't already have your AlanLeroy Monitoring teams in place.

The key question is "Monitor for what?"

What is the Texas Guard monitoring the Federal exercise for? And what questions can they answer the feds can't answer themselves? According to ted Cruz, Louis Gohmert, and inbred town hallers the concerns are about the Federal Military abusing citizens rights.

According to Alanleroy the monitoring is to keep citizens livestock safe from being run over by a tank....or something.....
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The key question is "Monitor for what?"



You're Right PJ...What could possibly go wrong with an "Unconventional Warfare exercise operating in and around communities."

Why would the Governor even want to be kept informed when the exercise merely includes "individuals conducting suspicious activities designed to prepare them for complex environments overseas."

Who in their right mind would want to be in the loop on schedules when the training only involves armed military personnel....perhaps in 'civilian attire' and 'driving civilian vehicles'.

“The problem that we have is there’s some people who are uninformed, and we’re setting them at ease,” he (Governor Abbott) said. “We are all together on the same page in making sure we rally behind and support our military, and at the same time making sure our fellow Texans seem more at ease.”

That's just crazy talk.
I suspect that "The Guard" will monitor Obama and friends due to a lack of trust. PJ asks "And what questions can they answer the feds can't answer themselves?" The answer to that is obviously none. I suspect that what Obama and friends can tell Texas authorities and what Obama and friends has told Texas authorities are two different things.

What proof does PJ possess regarding human inbreeding in Texas? Is it possible that PJ is simply slinging insults with no basis in fact, other than a hatred of Conservatives?


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The key question is "Monitor for what?"

What is the Texas Guard monitoring the Federal exercise for? And what questions can they answer the feds can't answer themselves? According to ted Cruz, Louis Gohmert, and inbred town hallers the concerns are about the Federal Military abusing citizens rights.

According to Alanleroy the monitoring is to keep citizens livestock safe from being run over by a tank....or something.....


Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
I suspect that "The Guard" will monitor Obama and friends due to a lack of trust. PJ asks "And what questions can they answer the feds can't answer themselves?" The answer to that is obviously none. I suspect that what Obama and friends can tell Texas authorities and what Obama and friends has told Texas authorities are two different things.

What proof does PJ possess regarding human inbreeding in Texas? Is it possible that PJ is simply slinging insults with no basis in fact, other than a hatred of Conservatives?


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The key question is "Monitor for what?"

What is the Texas Guard monitoring the Federal exercise for? And what questions can they answer the feds can't answer themselves? According to ted Cruz, Louis Gohmert, and inbred town hallers the concerns are about the Federal Military abusing citizens rights.

According to Alanleroy the monitoring is to keep citizens livestock safe from being run over by a tank....or something.....


Exactly !
Can you please explain to AlanLeroy the monitoring is based on the paranoia you cite ...he's really struggling to understand
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now