Obamacare Death Spiral

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII


That ain't going to happen...Because the Republicans don't want to lose the ACA as an issue and the Democrats don't want to admit there's a problem. Unfortunately that means these issues just continue to build up until it explodes. Same thing with the debt.


Having the ACA as an issue hasn't helped Republicans much with elections - certainly not with the popular vote.
I guess it's just coincidence that the year the ACA was rammed through congress the Democrats suffered the biggest political losses in 70 years.

What if they are right about the Death Spiral? All those failed Co-Ops...Major Insurers dropping the ACA like a hot potato? Are those real problems or not?



Yes...and obamacare is so widely hated that Republicans made the grandfather of that system their candidate in 2012 - while pretending he wasn't . But He lost. Badly. The man who implemented romneycare at th national level is currently enjoying one of the highest approval ratings of any presidents 7 years into his tenure. Because most people outside the FOX News bubble understand The ACA is better than the train wreck that came before it.

the governor of KY ran and won his campaign on rolling back Obamacare only to have his constituents demand he leave it alone once he took office. His huge overhaul of Obamacare ended up amounting to letting the Feds run it instead of his state. Amazing how an opinion can change when one is actually responsible for governing, isn't it?

its a pretty good blue print for what republicans would offer if they won the White House...and what Paul Ryan has Vaguely offered to date. What recent history and republicans have taught us is the single most hated attribute of Obamacare by far is....Obama. And when you learn that 40% of republicans believe he is an illegal immigrant from Africa you understand why

Nice rant. Of course if you're interested in facts, the ACA has never been viewed favorably by the majority of Americans.

And you didn't answer my question. Is this 'Death Spiral' business real or just made up bullshit? Are we not getting enough young/healthy people to sign up to make it viable? Should we be concerned that so many major insurers are walking away and most of the co-ops are bankrupt? Or is it really a rosy picture and not a big deal because there are others that will take their place?

And no...blah blah blah Romney or blah blah blah Kenyan is not a real answer.


No shit it hasn't been viewed favorably...myself included. But the debate hasn't been between the ACA and a "better alternative" .....its been between the ACA and the system that preceded ....lest you forget the 50 votes Congress has taken to bring us back.

This is where i call you out. You and i both agree there is a better solution than Obamacare. But unlike you my eyes are open to the actual debate in Washington. On the 50 votes congress has taken to bring us back to 2008 i say "bad idea". You ignire that effort and cry about the 1000 page bill that nobody read...or whatever sean Hannity's synopsis is.

For 7 years you and all your non-partisan friends on this board have slammed the ACA and all of its shortcomings and ignored all of its benefits. And you are completely unwilling to admit its a better system to forbid insurance companies from denying coverage to pre existing conditions, or lower costs for senior prescription drugs, or let college students stay on their parents plan....and other attributes.

And to answer your question...yes, there is a problem with the exchanges having a disproportionate number of sick people in the exchanges. You outlined a couple decent solutions that might address it....none of which require us to start over from the train wreck of preObamaCare as Congress has voted for 50 times, right?

But you can bet that will be the continued strategy. Republicans are furious the Kenyan got a big win - largely on a system they invented. And they wont be happy until they can take his name off it.
Post relocated
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

This is where i call you out. You and i both agree there is a better solution than Obamacare. But unlike you my eyes are open to the actual debate in Washington. On the 50 votes congress has taken to bring us back to 2008 i say "bad idea". You ignire that effort and cry about the 1000 page bill that nobody read...or whatever sean Hannity's synopsis is.

For 7 years you and all your non-partisan friends on this board have slammed the ACA and all of its shortcomings and ignored all of its benefits. And you are completely unwilling to admit its a better system to forbid insurance companies from denying coverage to pre existing conditions, or lower costs for senior prescription drugs, or let college students stay on their parents plan....and other attributes.

And to answer your question...yes, there is a problem with the exchanges having a disproportionate number of sick people in the exchanges. You outlined a couple decent solutions that might address it....none of which require us to start over from the train wreck of preObamaCare as Congress has voted for 50 times, right?
.

1. You obviously have me confused with a Republican since I have consistently said Democrats and Republicans should work together to fix the ACA, not repeal it. I also said that the strict party line vote on the ACA was an abomination and we would have been far better off with a bill that did less but was supported by both Democrats and Republicans. But we're beyond that now.
2. I have said that the 3 benefits (maybe the only generally supported ones) you point out could have been made by adding 3 paragraphs to the HIPPA law that required Group Insurance to insure people with pre-existing conditions instead of the 2000 page bill no one read. But we're beyond that now.
3. The Obamacare Repeal votes were a complete waste of time. Duh. But we're beyond that now.
4. At least you admit there's a serious problem brewing.....Many Democrats refuse to do that. Just like Republicans refuse to consider anything less than Repeal. That makes the implosion pretty much guaranteed.

obamacare never addressed the true problem of healthcare and costs.

5% of the population consumes 50% of the health costs
5% of medicare patients consume 30% of medicare costs.

Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
obamacare never addressed the true problem of healthcare and costs.

5% of the population consumes 50% of the health costs
5% of medicare patients consume 30% of medicare costs.


And neither does your solution of repealing Obamacare. But your solution does insure 18 million fewer people, raises drug costs for seniors, and gives free license to insurers to discriminate against sick people.

So given the choice I'll take Obamacare. If you and the rest of the birthers ever wish to provide the details of something better I'm all ears.

The problem with the theory that repealing will cost more is that it is a cbo estimate & all their estimates of obamacare have consistently been wrong; so why should people believe this one.

As explained many times, the cbo takes paramters given to them and privides an estimate. What are those paramters & are they correct?

What is a fact, is that obamacare costs way more than what we were told & it is one of the factors driving the defict back to $1T. Keeping a bad expensive law does not make any sense
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
What is a fact, is that obamacare costs way more than what we were told & it is one of the factors driving the defict back to $1T. Keeping a bad expensive law does not make any sense
Just so, . . . and worse: some of the "costs" which were documented haven't even kicked in yet.

F'rinstance, . . . lots of "new taxes":



Maybe all these taxes have something to do with the CBO estimate that an Obamacare repeal would increase the deficit.

DonDiego finds it, . . . umm, . . .what's the word, . . . umm, perhaps "interesting", . . . yeah, that's the word, "interesting" that all these increases in taxes jump up just as The Obama leaves office.



Liberals love new taxes.
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2


What is a fact, is that obamacare costs way more than what we were told & it is one of the factors driving the defict back to $1T. Keeping a bad expensive law does not make any sense


What do you purpose we replace it with?
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
What is a fact, is that obamacare costs way more than what we were told & it is one of the factors driving the defict back to $1T. Keeping a bad expensive law does not make any sense
Just so, . . . and worse: some of the "costs" which were documented haven't even kicked in yet.

F'rinstance, . . . lots of "new taxes":



Maybe all these taxes have something to do with the CBO estimate that an Obamacare repeal would increase the deficit.

DonDiego finds it, . . . umm, . . .what's the word, . . . umm, perhaps "interesting", . . . yeah, that's the word, "interesting" that all these increases in taxes jump up just as The Obama leaves office.



Liberals love new taxes.



I know its hard to believe that "things" cost "money". Its a pretty tough concept for most Iraq War cheerleaders to grapple with.

And its true - healthcare does indeed cost money whether it takes the form of private insurance or government subsidized insurance. But the key takeaway is Democrats actually provided a means to pay for their spending - hence the deficit reduction properties of the ACA.

But DonDiego need not worry. We have yet another candidate from the Republican party promising a whole new slew of spending amid promises to pay for it with tax cuts. Its good that voters have a choice.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
I know its hard to believe that "things" cost "money". Its a pretty tough concept for most Iraq War cheerleaders to grapple with.

And its true - healthcare does indeed cost money whether it takes the form of private insurance or government subsidized insurance. But the key takeaway is Democrats actually provided a means to pay for their spending - hence the deficit reduction properties of the ACA.

But DonDiego need not worry. We have yet another candidate from the Republican party promising a whole new slew of spending amid promises to pay for it with tax cuts. Its good that voters have a choice.

DonDiego asks pjstroh to trust that poor old DonDiego knows "things" cost "money".

DonDiego also knows The Obamacare will provide him "not a thing", . . . but somehow it's gonna cost him "money". It already cost him his physician.
He opines that combining the mandates of a powerful Government combined with once-supposed "free markets" for insurance and medical care won't work well or to his advantage.

Poor old DonDiego always worries. He finds both major party candidates objectionable. He seldom finds political candidates who promise him anything that he's interested in having them provide him.

The Libertarian candidate was DonDiego's Governor for a few years; so far as DonDiego can tell he did no harm. All DonDiego wants is to be left alone.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now