Quote
Originally posted by: pjstrohCowboykell chose the word "socialism" to describe the affordable care act's laws regulating private insurance companies. And i believe DonDiego has used that same term more rhan a few times in that same context.
Everyone is free to have opinions about the ACA...but I got news for you: Medicare is far more socialist than anything the ACA implemented. And here is more news for you...there is not a private insurance company on the planet that would voluntarily be the primary insurance carrier of anyone DonDiego's age without a Socialist law forcing them to do so.
SocialismDonDiego doubts he has called The Obamacare "socialist", although it is not absolutely impossible. The term socialism might arise in any conversation about ever-expanding Government sometimes appropriately, sometimes not. [See alanleroy's definition of "socialism" below as to why DonDiego doubts he called The Obamacare "socialism". Economically it is a hodgepodge combining private insurance companies with a Federal mandate on insurance purchasers with Federal supplements available based upon incomes.] The term"socialism" is also sometimes misapplied because it is associated with Government handouts; DonDiego cannot claim to be mistake-free on this matter..
The Obamacare does share with socialism the characteristic of inefficiency associated with ever-larger Government.
What DonDiego finds objectionable is:
i. it is compulsory.
ii. it has been implemented incompetently at the Federal and State levels; there is a good likelihood of incompetence and waste in its operation. That is what happens in a Big Government.
iii. implementation has not followed the letter of the law.
iv. it is going to raise demand for services and hence put pressure on availability/cost; medical facilities are already overburdened.
v. it is yet another freebie encouraging citizens to suckle at the Government teat.
MedicareDonDiego concurs that Medicare
is more "socialist"; the Government acts as the health insurer.
DonDiego's Private InsurerFor the record DonDiego's group health insurer is part of his retirement package; DonDiego pays a portion of the premiums, his former employer pays the rest. No "Socialist Law" [again, see alanleroy, below; DonDiego opines the term "Socialist Law" is inappropriate in this context] forces the company to do so. DonDiego expects the company to continue to insure him as long as he pays the premiums. Once his spouse is eligible for Medicare, she and DonDiego will have to do some figurin' to determine if they should i.retain the group health policy, ii.purchase a Medicare supplementary policy, or iii.jes' go with Medicare alone.
n.b. Prior to the implementation of Medicare in 1965 private insurers insured people of DonDiego's age. These time are known as "The Good Old Days".
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Socialism is an economic system where the government owns or controls the means of production. This is opposed to Capitalism which is rooted in private ownership of business enterprises. Calling functions like the Military, Police, and Tax Collection 'Socialist Programs', is just wrong. It's the normal function of Government in a Democracy. There's nothing Socialist about it.
If you say you're a socialist, it doesn't mean you support having a police department or an army. It means you want the collective to substantially own or control the production and distribution of goods and services.