Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

OVER!!!!

nuggetboy
nuggetboy
Feb 2, 2015
11:45pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hindsight is 20/20. Here are the two options given the clock and only one timeout. There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think, and this can be confirmed by watching the final play on Youtube.

1. 3 plays..............one pass, then Marshawn Lynch, then Marshawn Lynch again

2. 2 plays..........Marshawn Lynn, then Marshawn Lynch

Who the hell, without the knowledge of hindsight, chooses two plays instead of three?


Well, you're completely wrong about this. They could have easily run it three times with one time out AND 28 SECONDS ON THE CLOCK.

One Run. 7 Seconds. Time Out. Two Run 7 Seconds. Now You've got 15 Seconds to line up and run a third time. Lynch probably would have scored on the first one though.


Don't know.
He had 4 runs from the one yard line over the season and only scored once.
The Pat defense is pretty good. I do not think it is a lock that he gets in.
Apparently neither did Pete.


JM2300
JM2300
Feb 2, 2015
11:51pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hindsight is 20/20. Here are the two options given the clock and only one timeout. There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think, and this can be confirmed by watching the final play on Youtube.

1. 3 plays..............one pass, then Marshawn Lynch, then Marshawn Lynch again

2. 2 plays..........Marshawn Lynn, then Marshawn Lynch

Who the hell, without the knowledge of hindsight, chooses two plays instead of three?

Where are you getting this "There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think" and why does anybody have to watch the final play on Youtube for confirmation? I knew Seattle had one timeout left at games end and I truly believe boilerman and JM2300 weren't alone on this "secret".

Seattle is on the one yard line with a battering ram of a running back and one timeout left and they decide to pass.
A bonehead call and their loss was justly deserved.

alanleroy
alanleroy
Feb 3, 2015
12:09am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: nuggetboy
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hindsight is 20/20. Here are the two options given the clock and only one timeout. There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think, and this can be confirmed by watching the final play on Youtube.

1. 3 plays..............one pass, then Marshawn Lynch, then Marshawn Lynch again

2. 2 plays..........Marshawn Lynn, then Marshawn Lynch

Who the hell, without the knowledge of hindsight, chooses two plays instead of three?


Well, you're completely wrong about this. They could have easily run it three times with one time out AND 28 SECONDS ON THE CLOCK.

One Run. 7 Seconds. Time Out. Two Run 7 Seconds. Now You've got 15 Seconds to line up and run a third time. Lynch probably would have scored on the first one though.


Don't know.
He had 4 runs from the one yard line over the season and only scored once.
The Pat defense is pretty good. I do not think it is a lock that he gets in.
Apparently neither did Pete.

I'm just saying there was plenty of time to run it 3 times. Nothing's a lock...but he did just run for 5 yards. I don't think any team could stop him with no gain 3 plays in a row.
Boilerman
Boilerman
Feb 3, 2015
12:30am
Block User
The 2nd down snap happened at exactly 26 seconds (not at 28), and the BEST they would have done on a running play is to stop the clock with 18 seconds to go. That gives them one more rushing play, and time likely runs out.

The best plan was to pass, then rush twice.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hindsight is 20/20. Here are the two options given the clock and only one timeout. There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think, and this can be confirmed by watching the final play on Youtube.

1. 3 plays..............one pass, then Marshawn Lynch, then Marshawn Lynch again

2. 2 plays..........Marshawn Lynn, then Marshawn Lynch

Who the hell, without the knowledge of hindsight, chooses two plays instead of three?


Well, you're completely wrong about this. They could have easily run it three times with one time out AND 28 SECONDS ON THE CLOCK.

One Run. 7 Seconds. Time Out. Two Run 7 Seconds. Now You've got 15 Seconds to line up and run a third time. Lynch probably would have scored on the first one though.



alanleroy
alanleroy
Feb 3, 2015
12:42am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
The 2nd down snap happened at exactly 26 seconds (not at 28), and the BEST they would have done on a running play is to stop the clock with 18 seconds to go. That gives them one more rushing play, and time likely runs out.

The best plan was to pass, then rush twice.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hindsight is 20/20. Here are the two options given the clock and only one timeout. There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think, and this can be confirmed by watching the final play on Youtube.

1. 3 plays..............one pass, then Marshawn Lynch, then Marshawn Lynch again

2. 2 plays..........Marshawn Lynn, then Marshawn Lynch

Who the hell, without the knowledge of hindsight, chooses two plays instead of three?


Well, you're completely wrong about this. They could have easily run it three times with one time out AND 28 SECONDS ON THE CLOCK.

One Run. 7 Seconds. Time Out. Two Run 7 Seconds. Now You've got 15 Seconds to line up and run a third time. Lynch probably would have scored on the first one though.

Ok..we'll use your numbers....your saying a running play at the goal line takes 8 seconds (I don't think so, but Ok).

26 - 8 = 18. 18 - 8 = 10. You've got 10 seconds to line up and snap the ball. Pretty easy, really. Besides, the way Lynch was running at the end, it would have only taken one play anyway. Why even risk the INT? It was a stupid play call. Almost everyone in the world agrees. Almost.

drmilled
drmilled
Feb 3, 2015
12:49am
Block User
The best made plans of mice and man..... Rationalize it any way you want, the Seahawks lost because of a bonehead, ignorant, stupid , idiotic play call. Outplayed, out coached. The only thing they had in their favor was luck. Without the lucky catch, the ending is moot. Face it, the Seahawks were beaten in every category by the better team.
Boilerman
Boilerman
Feb 3, 2015
1:19am
Block User
Possibly inn 10 seconds you can line up and snap the ball. There is no time to look over the defense, no time to audible to a different Marshawn Lynch running play.

One pass, and two runs would give them plenty of time. Three runs likely never happens, and if it does, it's with a super rush.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
The 2nd down snap happened at exactly 26 seconds (not at 28), and the BEST they would have done on a running play is to stop the clock with 18 seconds to go. That gives them one more rushing play, and time likely runs out.

The best plan was to pass, then rush twice.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hindsight is 20/20. Here are the two options given the clock and only one timeout. There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think, and this can be confirmed by watching the final play on Youtube.

1. 3 plays..............one pass, then Marshawn Lynch, then Marshawn Lynch again

2. 2 plays..........Marshawn Lynn, then Marshawn Lynch

Who the hell, without the knowledge of hindsight, chooses two plays instead of three?


Well, you're completely wrong about this. They could have easily run it three times with one time out AND 28 SECONDS ON THE CLOCK.

One Run. 7 Seconds. Time Out. Two Run 7 Seconds. Now You've got 15 Seconds to line up and run a third time. Lynch probably would have scored on the first one though.

Ok..we'll use your numbers....your saying a running play at the goal line takes 8 seconds (I don't think so, but Ok).

26 - 8 = 18. 18 - 8 = 10. You've got 10 seconds to line up and snap the ball. Pretty easy, really. Besides, the way Lynch was running at the end, it would have only taken one play anyway. Why even risk the INT? It was a stupid play call. Almost everyone in the world agrees. Almost.


alanleroy
alanleroy
Feb 3, 2015
1:27am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Possibly inn 10 seconds you can line up and snap the ball. There is no time to look over the defense, no time to audible to a different Marshawn Lynch running play.

One pass, and two runs would give them plenty of time. Three runs likely never happens, and if it does, it's with a super rush.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
The 2nd down snap happened at exactly 26 seconds (not at 28), and the BEST they would have done on a running play is to stop the clock with 18 seconds to go. That gives them one more rushing play, and time likely runs out.

The best plan was to pass, then rush twice.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hindsight is 20/20. Here are the two options given the clock and only one timeout. There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think, and this can be confirmed by watching the final play on Youtube.

1. 3 plays..............one pass, then Marshawn Lynch, then Marshawn Lynch again

2. 2 plays..........Marshawn Lynn, then Marshawn Lynch

Who the hell, without the knowledge of hindsight, chooses two plays instead of three?


Well, you're completely wrong about this. They could have easily run it three times with one time out AND 28 SECONDS ON THE CLOCK.

One Run. 7 Seconds. Time Out. Two Run 7 Seconds. Now You've got 15 Seconds to line up and run a third time. Lynch probably would have scored on the first one though.

Ok..we'll use your numbers....your saying a running play at the goal line takes 8 seconds (I don't think so, but Ok).

26 - 8 = 18. 18 - 8 = 10. You've got 10 seconds to line up and snap the ball. Pretty easy, really. Besides, the way Lynch was running at the end, it would have only taken one play anyway. Why even risk the INT? It was a stupid play call. Almost everyone in the world agrees. Almost.

Well Seattle was the best rushing team in the NFL. You play to your strength. You've got to trust your team can get one yard...no fancy passes...no audibles. Just line up your big men and push....just like the previous play where Lynch just gashed them for 5. It was a boneheaded play call and it lost them the game. If they can't get one yard handing the ball to beastmode 3 times they deserve to lose.

Blade
Blade
Feb 3, 2015
3:02am
Block User
think this belongs here


Boilerman
Boilerman
Feb 3, 2015
3:35am
Block User
So Leroy tells us that without the benefit of hindsight, he votes to two running plays instead of a pass and two running plays. NO ONE WOULD HAVE VOTED FOR TWO PLAYS INSTEAD OF THREE PLAYS BEFORE THE INTERCEPTION.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Possibly inn 10 seconds you can line up and snap the ball. There is no time to look over the defense, no time to audible to a different Marshawn Lynch running play.

One pass, and two runs would give them plenty of time. Three runs likely never happens, and if it does, it's with a super rush.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
The 2nd down snap happened at exactly 26 seconds (not at 28), and the BEST they would have done on a running play is to stop the clock with 18 seconds to go. That gives them one more rushing play, and time likely runs out.

The best plan was to pass, then rush twice.


Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hindsight is 20/20. Here are the two options given the clock and only one timeout. There was not two timeouts as everyone seems to think, and this can be confirmed by watching the final play on Youtube.

1. 3 plays..............one pass, then Marshawn Lynch, then Marshawn Lynch again

2. 2 plays..........Marshawn Lynn, then Marshawn Lynch

Who the hell, without the knowledge of hindsight, chooses two plays instead of three?


Well, you're completely wrong about this. They could have easily run it three times with one time out AND 28 SECONDS ON THE CLOCK.

One Run. 7 Seconds. Time Out. Two Run 7 Seconds. Now You've got 15 Seconds to line up and run a third time. Lynch probably would have scored on the first one though.

Ok..we'll use your numbers....your saying a running play at the goal line takes 8 seconds (I don't think so, but Ok).

26 - 8 = 18. 18 - 8 = 10. You've got 10 seconds to line up and snap the ball. Pretty easy, really. Besides, the way Lynch was running at the end, it would have only taken one play anyway. Why even risk the INT? It was a stupid play call. Almost everyone in the world agrees. Almost.

Well Seattle was the best rushing team in the NFL. You play to your strength. You've got to trust your team can get one yard...no fancy passes...no audibles. Just line up your big men and push....just like the previous play where Lynch just gashed them for 5. It was a boneheaded play call and it lost them the game. If they can't get one yard handing the ball to beastmode 3 times they deserve to lose.


Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now