The Price I’ve Paid for Opposing Donald Trump

Poor Roulette Man. Minutes after his first post is exposed as bullshit, he cites the very source of the bullshit as proof.
I guess this is what a lifelong loser thinks victory must feel like.
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Poor Roulette Man. Minutes after his first post is exposed as bullshit, he cites the very source of the bullshit as proof.
I guess this is what a lifelong loser thinks victory must feel like.



First of all, you cite Snopes as if it was the Bible, when in fact Snopes has a history of being politically biased, because of the writers that are employed by them.

IT IS ALL OVER THE INTERNET AND YOU CAN'T DISPROVE THAT SHE SAID IT.

If I was a lifelong loser, I'd have hundreds of pages of cut and pastes on my computer, trying to defend unethical and criminal politicians. Sound like anybody you know?
The author states he wasn't there, and has no way of knowing what she said, but it sounds like something he believes she would say, and then you cite the author as proof, in spite of his statements.
Then we have the small problem, minor really, of Hitler almost certainly not saying what you claim he said.
But it's on the internet, so it must be true.
More Clinton witchcraft, I imagine.
Quote



If I was a lifelong loser, I'd have hundreds of pages of cut and pastes on my computer, trying to defend unethical and criminal politicians. Sound like anybody you know?


Says the guy who has so many memes on his hd that he has to alphabetize them.

Quote

Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)





And to think Forkie and the other liberals think Snopes is a solid political source.
Link
What a piece of Trump. Rather than admit he is wrong, he starts attacking people based on their former jobs.
What does any of this have to do with the books author admitting he made up the quote?
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote

...IT IS ALL OVER THE INTERNET AND YOU CAN'T DISPROVE THAT SHE SAID IT...
So if it's all over the internet that means it's true? Really?

You know what's also all over the internet? Area 51. Body Thetans. 9-11 was an "inside job." The Sandy Hook Elementary School was a false flag. Birtherism.

So how do you decide which to believe? In your case Roulette Man, you believe the ones that you really, really want to, and admit it, that is your only standard. Which should be embarrassing to anyone with a functioning brain stem.
But it's on the internet!
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
What a piece of Trump. Rather than admit he is wrong, he starts attacking people based on their former jobs.
What does any of this have to do with the books author admitting he made up the quote?


So you lie at one job and that has no meaning or reflection of what you do in your next job? Seriously. Are you really this dense?
It's on the internet, it must be true.
By the way, many historians rate Clinton as one of the best modern Presidents and calling the tea party what she did most certainly isn't a lie.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now