The Private Server

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99

WTF do you want him to do, read them to you?

I have to agree with CBK, your stuff pretty much sucks anymore. It's the same thing over and over again, spew some BS(right or wrong, usually wrong and proven, but you won't read the sourves), throw an insult or two in, lather, rinse repeat.
Gettin' pretty lame forkie.

Yep. We all miss the old forkush.....the kinder, gentler forkie we all knew and loved. I'm blaming Obama for the change.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV[/i
According to the above quote supplied by Roulette Man:

  • The Roulette Man graphic's headline is a complete lie.
  • The Roulette Man graphic's quotation has been deliberately altered.
  • The subject of Roulette Man's graphic says he terminated Hillary because she was no longer needed.

    Any disagreement on any of those bullet points? Anyone?


  • yeah, I disagree with all of them. Just because you wrote them.

    It wasn't too long ago I I had respect for your comments and even appreciated many of your responses as they seemed to come from a rational person. We might disagree in our politics but you usually came across as sincere and smart. Lately you seem to be slipping into some kind of intolerant rage. If the pattern continues you will soon be spewing spittle as you scream at the internet like Marcisdave.
    Sorry if this sounds like a personal attack but I yearn for a return of the real Forky that actually won more arguments than lost.

    Okay, I'll put you down as a "Disagree" and your reason as "just because." Thanks for responding.

    I think I know the root of your resentment. It was when you claimed that there was no Republican gerrymander, and I produced court docs filed by the Republican governor of Texas admitting that there was, and a website from the National Republican Party bragging about gerrymandering congressional districts.

    I don't blame you for your feelings. That must have been humiliating.


    You obviously didn't look into those articles as I suggested. You lost that one.



    "Look into those articles?" Is that anything like "Google it?" Dude, do your own homework. In the meantime, I've provided quotes from the national GOP and the Republican Texas governor bragging about gerrymandering, and all you have is "look into those articles."

    No wonder your feelings are vewy vewy hurt.



    WTF do you want him to do, read them to you?...


    No. Cowboy Kell just needs to back up his claims. You know, like me.

    I claim there was Republican gerrymandering and I prove it with the words of high-ranking Republicans. He says there isn't gerrymandering, and "proves" it by saying, "Look into those articles." Aren't you just a little embarrassed for him?
    Quote

    Originally posted by: alanleroy
    Quote

    Originally posted by: jatki99

    WTF do you want him to do, read them to you?

    I have to agree with CBK, your stuff pretty much sucks anymore. It's the same thing over and over again, spew some BS(right or wrong, usually wrong and proven, but you won't read the sourves), throw an insult or two in, lather, rinse repeat.
    Gettin' pretty lame forkie.

    Yep. We all miss the old forkush.....the kinder, gentler forkie we all knew and loved...
    Really?



    Quote

    Originally posted by: alanleroy
    I'm blaming Obama for the change.


    "There is no classified information on my email server The information on the server was not classified at the time." -Hillary Clinton

    We know now that there was indeed classified information and some was Top Secret. According to the DoD regulations, somebody can go to prison.

    How can one attempt to be President without being allowed access to classified information because she is a security risk?

    Quote

    Originally posted by: forkushV
    "Look into those articles?" Is that anything like "Google it?" Dude, do your own homework. In the meantime, I've provided quotes from the national GOP and the Republican Texas governor bragging about gerrymandering, and all you have is "look into those articles."

    No wonder your feelings are vewy vewy hurt.


    I really don't understand the hurt feelings remark. Maybe you haven't given enough info.
    Anyway, I do not refute the out of context quotes you have cited. It's perfectly true. The GOP led redistricting committee returned many voting districts back to an unbiased, population based boundary. This was done after democrat led committees twisted voting districts into multi lobed jigsaw puzzle shaped districts that often went many, many miles to grab a small section out of another district. This has been a problem in Texas, especially the southern part of the State for many decades. It's all in the articles.
    Forkie has truly LOST it. I'm almost embarrassed for him.
    "At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."
    __Aristotle


    U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 93, § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

    (a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

    (b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).

    (c) In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

    U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 37, § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

    (a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
    (b) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
    (c) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
    (d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
    (e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
    (f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense,
    (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or
    (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
    (g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.
    (h)
    (1) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall forfeit to the United States, irrespective of any provision of State law, any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, from any foreign government, or any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, as the result of such violation. For the purposes of this subsection, the term “State” includes a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.
    (2) The court, in imposing sentence on a defendant for a conviction of a violation of this section, shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States all property described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.
    (3) The provisions of subsections (b), (c), and (e) through (p) ofsection 413 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853 (b), (c), and (e)–(p)) shall apply to—
    (A) property subject to forfeiture under this subsection;
    (B) any seizure or disposition of such property; and
    (C) any administrative or judicial proceeding in relation to such property,
    if not inconsistent with this subsection.
    (4) Notwithstanding section 524 (c) of title 28, there shall be deposited in the Crime Victims Fund in the Treasury all amounts from the forfeiture of property under this subsection remaining after the payment of expenses for forfeiture and sale authorized by law.
    Like DonDiego, I want to paste a whole bunch of words that no one will read.

    Abstract
    The histogenesis of colloid cysts (CCs) of the third ventricle has been a subject of controversy. We examined, using immunohistochemical techniques, four CCs for the presence of cytokeratins (CKs), glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes (GST-pi, GST-mu), and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Antibodies to both low molecular weight CKs (anti-CK8) and to a mixture of CKs (AE1/AE3) were used. For comparison, normal fetal and adult choroid plexus, ependyma, and nasal mucosa were also examined. The epithelium lining all four CCs showed positive immunostaining for the CKs and GST-pi but not for GST-mu or glial fibrillary acidic protein. Fetal and adult nasal mucosa showed a pattern of immunohistochemical staining almost identical to that of CCs. In contrast, fetal and adult choroid plexus tissue showed positive immunostaining for GST-pi and low molecular weight CKs but not for the CK mixture (AE1/AE3). Fetal and adult ependyma were negative for both CKs and GST-pi. These results suggest that CCs differentiate along nonneural lines distinct from the neuroepithelial differentiation of the choroid plexus and ependyma.

    What genius did this research?

    One of them was Senator Ben Carson, Republican candidate running for President - who apparently was for fetal tissue research before he was against it. Oh dear.
    Quote

    Originally posted by: forkushV
    Like DonDiego, I want to paste a whole bunch of words that no one will read.

    Abstract
    The histogenesis of colloid cysts (CCs) of the third ventricle has been a subject of controversy. We examined, using immunohistochemical techniques, four CCs for the presence of cytokeratins (CKs), glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes (GST-pi, GST-mu), and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Antibodies to both low molecular weight CKs (anti-CK8) and to a mixture of CKs (AE1/AE3) were used. For comparison, normal fetal and adult choroid plexus, ependyma, and nasal mucosa were also examined. The epithelium lining all four CCs showed positive immunostaining for the CKs and GST-pi but not for GST-mu or glial fibrillary acidic protein. Fetal and adult nasal mucosa showed a pattern of immunohistochemical staining almost identical to that of CCs. In contrast, fetal and adult choroid plexus tissue showed positive immunostaining for GST-pi and low molecular weight CKs but not for the CK mixture (AE1/AE3). Fetal and adult ependyma were negative for both CKs and GST-pi. These results suggest that CCs differentiate along nonneural lines distinct from the neuroepithelial differentiation of the choroid plexus and ependyma.

    What genius did this research?

    One of them was Senator Ben Carson, Republican candidate running for President - who apparently was for fetal tissue research before he was against it. Oh dear.

    DonDiego suggests forkushv"s post is not appropriate for the thread The Private Server.
    He recommends forkushV initiate a new thread if forkushV chooses to belittle Doctor Benjamin Solomon Carson, Sr., one-time Professor of Neurosurgery, Oncology, Plastic Surgery, and Pediatrics, and Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital.
    Already a LVA subscriber?
    To continue reading, choose an option below:
    Diamond Membership
    $3 per month
    Unlimited access to LVA website
    Exclusive subscriber-only content
    Limited Member Rewards Online
    Join Now
    or
    Platinum Membership
    $50 per year
    Unlimited access to LVA website
    Exclusive subscriber-only content
    Exclusive Member Rewards Book
    Join Now