Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKellQuote
Originally posted by: daviddechenne
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
Speaking of fairy tales, The Republican co-frontrunner (according to most polls) has just been exposed as a flim-flam man. Now that the grift is up, I suspect Dr. Ben Carson will be making for the exit soon.
Malibber has often opined here that one of the most lucrative marketing gigs is giving the conservative sheep what they want. I have to hand it to Dr. Ben Carson he brilliantly fleeced the sheep.
Source
oooooh, be very careful there mal. Perhaps you should look up the case of Dan Meyers vs. Scott Tempesta and the Sailing Anarchy website. Mr. Tempesta and his site had their pants sued off because of a statement on a forum almost identical to yours.
Ooooooh, very, very doubtful! See NYTimes vs. Sullivan 1964.
NYT vs. Sullivan is not the same. The subject matter to attend is malice and slander. In Meyers vs. Tempesta the offense is almost identical to malibber's.
Plaintiff (Dan Meyers) filed suit just before the statute of limitations ran, alleging defamation after Plaintiff, a public figure, was referred to as a "grifter" in a forum post in August 2009 (by Scott tempest, owner of the web site and forum "Sailing Anarchy"). Plaintiff is a very wealthy individual who took similar action to shut down another sailing-related blog when he was unhappy with its content. Defendant beleives that the lawsuit has no merit, but that Plaintiff will use his superior resources to bankrupt defendants with litigation costs before they can previal at trial.
Meyers won.
