Vegas Free-for-All - Protests Rage Outside Trump Rally

Protests Rage Outside Trump Rally

forkushV

Jun 6, 2016
9:58am

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV

Yep, while he was in front of thousands and recorded for a national audience.

Anyone who has that little impulse control should be no where near the nuclear codes. It's disqualifying.

"Hillary Clinton has a “Jekyll and Hyde” personality that left White House staffers scared stiff of her explosive — and even physical — outbursts, an ex-Secret Service officer claims in a scathing new tell-all.

Gary Byrne, who was posted outside the Oval Office when Bill Clinton was president, portrays Hillary as too “erratic, uncontrollable and occasionally violent” to become leader of the free world."

Man...both candidates now disqualified for lack of impulse control...
If you believe what millions of us saw when Donald Trump lacked impulse control and encouraged violence at his rallies, then yes, Trump is disqualified from being president.

If you choose to believe what a lone uncorroborated politically and money motivated author wrote about Clinton, then yes, Hillary is disqualified.

I think we can all agree on that.
Why should we believe someone who served 30 years in Federal Law Enforcement?...
One guy? Out of thousands of agents? Next question.

And conflating yelling at people with advocating violence is something I would expect from an extreme right wing phony independent. Mission Accomplished!
One guy...
Yep, that's all you got.

Next.

Mark Felt was one guy too.....But there are plenty of others who claim Hillary is quick to anger....and petty.....and throws child-like tantrums...

jatki's source was discredited already by Snopes, and you seem short on details. In any case:

to have a temper is common;

to advocate violence from the campaign podium is disqualifying; and

to equate the two is incredibly dishonest and not at all surprising coming from you, alanleroy.

chefantwon

Jun 6, 2016
10:29am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Oh...and aren't we really talking about lack of good JUDGEMENT??? On the Hillary ledger there's that Iraq War Vote...and turning Libya into a Failed Nation...and the Reset Button....and the Cozy up to (and later attacks on) 'The Reformer' Assad.....And her home brewed, unsecure e-mail server. It's almost like she screwed up everything she touched at State. What else has she accomplished?

Not too much - except coordinate with Russia and China to put the most substantial sanctions on Iran in modern history which ultimately laid the groundwork for the diplomatic deal reached with Iran to curtail their nuclear program. Oh - and I understand there is a huge slew of right wing pundits that decry that deal while saying they could do it much better....without offering any specifics. They have a similar and equally BS position on healthcare reform.

And nevermind that her Tenure of Secretary of State has yielded her a relationship with almost every national leader of every major country on the planet....it doesn't measure up. Trump built a golf course in Dubai - and Sarah Palin can see Russia from her house. Hillary has 4 years worth of intelligence briefings at the highest level : info on ISIS, Putin, the tribal factions in Syria and Iraq, Chavez, Castro. So, yeah, no big deal. I'm sure Trump might be able to find Afghanistan on a map by his second term.

You're counting that F**ked up deal with Iran a plus??? I didn't know Indiana passed legalized Marijuana?

pjstroh

Jun 6, 2016
11:46am

Block User

chefantwan falls into the aforementioned category I referenced:

"Oh - and I understand there is a huge slew of right wing pundits that decry that deal while saying they could do it much better....without offering any specifics. They have a similar and equally BS position on healthcare reform"

hoops2

Jun 6, 2016
12:21pm

Block User

Iran will gets a nuclear weapon within a few years, the right to sell oil and $150b. The US gets nothing.

Sometimes no deal is better than a bad deal.

So what if Clinton sat in on briefings. US foreign policy on Russia, China, Libya, Isis, N Korea to name a few has been a failure.

alanleroyII

Jun 6, 2016
12:55pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV

Yep, while he was in front of thousands and recorded for a national audience.

Anyone who has that little impulse control should be no where near the nuclear codes. It's disqualifying.

"Hillary Clinton has a “Jekyll and Hyde” personality that left White House staffers scared stiff of her explosive — and even physical — outbursts, an ex-Secret Service officer claims in a scathing new tell-all.

Gary Byrne, who was posted outside the Oval Office when Bill Clinton was president, portrays Hillary as too “erratic, uncontrollable and occasionally violent” to become leader of the free world."

Man...both candidates now disqualified for lack of impulse control...
If you believe what millions of us saw when Donald Trump lacked impulse control and encouraged violence at his rallies, then yes, Trump is disqualified from being president.

If you choose to believe what a lone uncorroborated politically and money motivated author wrote about Clinton, then yes, Hillary is disqualified.

I think we can all agree on that.
Why should we believe someone who served 30 years in Federal Law Enforcement?...
One guy? Out of thousands of agents? Next question.

And conflating yelling at people with advocating violence is something I would expect from an extreme right wing phony independent. Mission Accomplished!
One guy...
Yep, that's all you got.

Next.
Mark Felt was one guy too.....But there are plenty of others who claim Hillary is quick to anger....and petty.....and throws child-like tantrums...

jatki's source was discredited already by Snopes, and you seem short on details. In any case:

to have a temper is common;

to advocate violence from the campaign podium is disqualifying; and

to equate the two is incredibly dishonest and not at all surprising coming from you, alanleroy.

Since (as normal) you keep wanting to make this personal...we might as well evaluate your motives. Coming from an alleged liberal who claimed to be oh so against the Iraq War, I would have thought you would have disqualified Hillary for supporting it....That is if you weren't such a dishonest neocon hypocrite.

How many lives did that boondoggle cost? How many trillions? Thank your candidate for that. She should have known better...especially if she expects to be Commander In Chief and control the nuclear codes. Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders and Obama got it. She can't hide from her poor decisions....disqualifying decisions...but her fluffers like you sure can...and do.

forkushV

Jun 6, 2016
1:40pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV

Yep, while he was in front of thousands and recorded for a national audience.

Anyone who has that little impulse control should be no where near the nuclear codes. It's disqualifying.

"Hillary Clinton has a “Jekyll and Hyde” personality that left White House staffers scared stiff of her explosive — and even physical — outbursts, an ex-Secret Service officer claims in a scathing new tell-all.

Gary Byrne, who was posted outside the Oval Office when Bill Clinton was president, portrays Hillary as too “erratic, uncontrollable and occasionally violent” to become leader of the free world."

Man...both candidates now disqualified for lack of impulse control...
If you believe what millions of us saw when Donald Trump lacked impulse control and encouraged violence at his rallies, then yes, Trump is disqualified from being president.

If you choose to believe what a lone uncorroborated politically and money motivated author wrote about Clinton, then yes, Hillary is disqualified.

I think we can all agree on that.
Why should we believe someone who served 30 years in Federal Law Enforcement?...
One guy? Out of thousands of agents? Next question.

And conflating yelling at people with advocating violence is something I would expect from an extreme right wing phony independent. Mission Accomplished!
One guy...
Yep, that's all you got.

Next.
Mark Felt was one guy too.....But there are plenty of others who claim Hillary is quick to anger....and petty.....and throws child-like tantrums...
jatki's source was discredited already by Snopes, and you seem short on details. In any case:

to have a temper is common;
to advocate violence from the campaign podium is disqualifying; and
to equate the two is incredibly dishonest and not at all surprising coming from you, alanleroy.

Actually I voted against her for it, in 2008 and 2016. She exhibited bad judgment, you know, like when FDR opposed integrating our armed forces, or when JFK launched the Bay of Pigs invasion, when LBJ escalated in Vietnam, or when when Reagan placed troops in Beirut.

But I'm referring to temperament. Anyone who is so out of control that they advocate violence from the campaign podium should not be trusted with the nuclear launch codes. Disqualified.

hoops2

Jun 6, 2016
9:20pm

Block User

Forky's outrage is phony, since there is no way he would ever vote for a Republican.

alanleroyII

Jun 7, 2016
12:07am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Actually I voted against her for it, in 2008 and 2016. She exhibited bad judgment, you know, like when FDR opposed integrating our armed forces, or when JFK launched the Bay of Pigs invasion, when LBJ escalated in Vietnam, or when when Reagan placed troops in Beirut.

But I'm referring to temperament. Anyone who is so out of control that they advocate violence from the campaign podium should not be trusted with the nuclear launch codes. Disqualified.

Remind me why you trust someone with the nuclear codes when they've shown bad judgment in matters of war. A War that we are still paying for in so many ways. With that kind of decision making....Disqualified! It's almost like she took a poll to find out how to vote.

And if you want to talk temperament...

“Some day I hope to meet you,” Truman warned Hume, who had dared to give daughter Margaret Truman’s recital a bad review. “When that happens you’ll need a new nose, a lot of beefsteak for bad eyes, and perhaps a supporter below!”

So...a sitting Democrat President threatened to punch a man in the nose, blacken his eyes and kick him in the nuts. Give 'em Hell Harry.

Don

Jun 7, 2016
12:32am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote
Originally posted by: billryanHilary turned me into a newt.

Throw her in the pond and see if she floats.

DonDiego suggests this should be a Win-Win Situation.

However, the more likely result is that The Hillary would float. And in this Modern Age any further punishment would not be permitted.

DonDiego pines for The Good Old Days.

forkushV

Jun 7, 2016
12:38am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Actually I voted against her for it, in 2008 and 2016. She exhibited bad judgment, you know, like when FDR opposed integrating our armed forces, or when JFK launched the Bay of Pigs invasion, when LBJ escalated in Vietnam, or when when Reagan placed troops in Beirut.

But I'm referring to temperament. Anyone who is so out of control that they advocate violence from the campaign podium should not be trusted with the nuclear launch codes. Disqualified.

Remind me why you trust someone with the nuclear codes when they've shown bad judgment in matters of war...

The same war that Trump supported, right?

To answer your question, I'll take someone who thinks rationally (Hillary) over someone who has little impulse control and may behave irrationally (Trump). Both may make mistakes, but the second kind are a lot more scary.

«‹6 ›

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now