Recount ordered in Wisconsin.

"In a statement, Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Michael Haas guessed that the cost and complexity of the recount would be in excess of the state’s last recount in 2011, which carried a price tag of more than $520,000. In that recount over a state Supreme Court seat, the commission had to recount 1.5 million votes — about half the 2.975 million ballot votes that were cast during the 2016 presidential election."
Ref: The Washington Post

Well, . . . one could feed the homeless.
Or, for around $6-per-bottle one could supply approximately 87,000 winos with the highly rated Thunderbird 'The American Classic' White Wine.

On a more serious note, . . . what if the recount is hacked ?
Oh look! from The Washington Post article cited above: "[Jill] Stein put a note on her Facebook page on Friday, asking supporters 'to consider volunteering to help in the recount process.' ” Yeah, . . . that'll add confidence to the recount.

For what it's worth:
i. DonDiego has no objection to an honest recount of any/all States.
ii. DonDiego recognizes that Ms. Stein's efforts will, in fact, be "successful", . . . as she gets to keep any monies not actually spent towards a recount, . . . perhaps for a future political run.

I wonder why last place finisher, Jill Stein, had so much trouble raising money in the general election yet she seems to be raising money very easily for the re-count:

mysterious-case-jill-steins-surging-recount-costs

I'm sure she'd have had no trouble raising money Hillary won.
As they say,sunshine is the best disinfectant. Trump is controversial enough. I think it is best this be examined now and put to bed. Especially since its not being paid for by tax dollars.

Hillary has shown an obvious unethical and crooked side, and most Liberals have shown a willingness to overlook such behavior, as long as it leads to a Liberal in office.

The honest adults had better keep a close eye on this process.

Everyone should keep an eye on this process.

Remember a few weeks ago the liberals were telling us that there wasn't election fraud & $ spent looking into it was a waste of $$

No,I don't.
I do recall many discussions about voter fraud. Equating that and the possibility of election machines being hacked is not something I would have expected from you up to a few weeks ago.

Billy's argument, if I recall correctly, was that there is little history of catching voter fraud, thus there must be little voter fraud, thus there is no reason to pay it any attention. Now, even though we have no history of voter fraud based on hacking, we must investigate.

Billy's position is interesting, yet predictable.

Hacking voting machines that is fraud.

Interestingly the machines were supplied by an ally of George soros.

Your reaction is both moronic and predictable.