Quote
Originally posted by: lvfritz
7 years ago the country made a pretty serious mistake (YMMV), they thought it would be a good thing to elect a Chicago Democrat President. A bigger error hasn't been made since the Vatican put a priest from Cicero Illinois in charge of their treasury. And now, seemingly unconvinced, the country is looking at the prospect of making the very same mistake all over again! For some, a very erratic, social psycho, the Donald would be a better alternative. For others, the corrupt, scandal ridden former Secretary of State with zero accomplishments on her looooong resume might be the better answer.
Me? I'd like to see something better from either party. But alas, it looks like I will be stuck making a decision between two very lousy candidates. I don't see many folks here trumpeting for Trump......and I can't for the life of me understand how so many folks here see another Chicago Democrat as something worthy of their precious vote.
The camp on the left isn't going to convince those of us on the right that Liarry is vote worthy......those on the right here aren't going to convince those on the left that Trump is worthy of their votes. So on it goes. 300 million people and this is the best we can come up with? How embarrassing.....for all of us.
There's only one candidate in this election that has promised to kill free trade and "not allow companies to send jobs over seas". And its not the socialist that lost the primary to Hillary. Its the fascist lvfritz will be voting for in November.
And lets be honest - if a Democrat held those positions on free trade and global corporatization Lvfritz and every republican on the planet would have a collective stroke.
Lets be clear - for them, "socialism" is when the government sets up a free market exchange of competing, private insurance companies....but its something else for the Federal government to dictate to corporations how their global infrastructure should be set up. They'll even cast their vote for the latter.
Good luck in November.
