Required at work?

Pretty interesting, wha;s more is the employees are behind it 100%. I know I fell it would prevent anything "really bad", random shooting, hold-ups, etc but I'm sure others feel completely opposite. Whichever side of the fence it's an interesting development, for an employeer to require workers to train and and carry on the job.

Company owner requires workers to have firearm at the office

"ATLANTA (AP) -- The decision by the owner of a small insurance company to require his employees to carry firearms at the office has sparked a debate: Would having a gun on the job make you safer, or is it inviting violence into the workplace?

Lance Toland said his three offices, based at small airports in Georgia, haven't had problems with crime but "anyone can slip in these days if they want to. I don't have a social agenda here. I have a safety agenda."

When a longtime employee, a National Rifle Association-certified instructor who's been the company's unofficial security officer announced her retirement, Toland wanted to ensure the remaining employees were safe. He now requires each of them to get a concealed-carry permit, footing the $65 bill, and undergo training. He issues a Taurus revolver known as "The Judge" to each of them. The firearm holds five rounds, .410 shells that cast a spray of pellets like a shotgun.

"It is a weapon, and it is a lethal weapon," said Toland, whose company specializes in aviation insurance. "When a perpetrator comes into the home or the office, they have started a fire. And this is a fire extinguisher. No employee balked at the mandate, he said. "They all embraced it 100 percent, and they said, you know, I'm tired of being afraid," Toland said.

An employer's legal standing to impose such a requirement depends on several factors, foremost whether the business is high risk, a convenience store or taxi company, for example, said Carin Burford, a labor lawyer in Birmingham, Alabama..."



I didn't even know there was such a thing as a 5 shot .410 revolver. Got a little stopping power there.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/company-owner-requires-workers-firearm-192744801.html
2 pounds empty.
When people find out that ALL employees are wearing one,NO ONE will mess with that place.
https://www.cabelas.com/product/Taurus-Judge-Revolvers/706578.uts
It does have a little stopping-power.
It's also chambered for a Colt .45.
Must have a hell of a re-coil. Rubber grips help.
It would be interesting to see if he can legally require them. I wonder if a qualified applicant was turned down for not wanting to carry a gun, if they would have a case against him.
With this publicity, I suspect we will find out.
My initial reaction is that an employer should not be allowed to mandate that employees carry firearms.

I think BillyR is probably correct and we will probably find out.

Remember the town in Ga. that kinda required guns back when...?

https://www.snopes.com/kennesaw-gun-law/
This is purely a publicity stunt.

I can't imagine his small offices carry much, if any, cash or are crime-laden and would need EVERY employee to be packing.
Quote

Originally posted by: friedmush
This is purely a publicity stunt.

I can't imagine his small offices carry much, if any, cash or are crime-laden and would need EVERY employee to be packing.


Because his security officer retired.

I wish my office had this. I bet there'd be a lot less folks running the printer paper tray empty and not filling it up.
Nothing safer than a bunch of inexperienced shooters filling a room with buckshot.

I've never understood the thought process behind- I'm afraid so I'm going to get a gun. Having a gun doesn't make you brave. It simply makes you a coward with a gun.
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Nothing safer than a bunch of inexperienced shooters filling a room with buckshot.

I've never understood the thought process behind- I'm afraid so I'm going to get a gun. Having a gun doesn't make you brave. It simply makes you a coward with a gun.


COWARD!? Seriously?? First off, I doubt there's very many people who are actually "afraid", but maybe there's a little thing in the back of their minds "I'm not going to be a victim". Daily life continues with nothing different but maybe just a little peace of mind.

As far as the coward thing goes, that's utterly absurd to call anyone who has a firearm a coward. Why? How so? Since my accident, there's no way in ell I could fight anyone off physically so we own a few guns. To call anyone a coward for owning(perhaps there a few,but..) a firearm is insulting and a stretch to say the least.

My wife is the furthest thing from a coward nor am I. Afraid? absolutely not, not whatsoever. Something I guess any non-gun person will ever understand and continue to lump everyone togother. Whatever.

I do have reservations about the .410 shells, a room full of buckshot isn't the brightest idea. Put a laser on it with regular.45 hollow points, plenty of stopping power there.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now