Rob Singer and MoneyLA - Is the honeymoon over?



GEESH!!!

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Now that would be a big brouhaha....maybe even a hullabaloo.

I'd like a good old fashioned ruckus. Then maybe there could be a hot time in the old town tonight!
Quote

Originally posted by: knagl
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Now that would be a big brouhaha....maybe even a hullabaloo.

I'd like a good old fashioned ruckus. Then maybe there could be a hot time in the old town tonight!


Perhaps a throwdown at the hoedown.
Quote

Originally posted by: arcimedes
Quote

Originally posted by: KayPea
The intensity in with you must continuously and obsessively combat anything that supports his system anywhere on the internet would lead others to believe you have an emotional investment in the issue, and that emotion is something less than love.



If you think spending a couple of minutes a day pointing out the facts is "obsessive" then you and I have different definitions. Refuting the lies of Singer and his supporters is a trivial exercise.

Yeah, but those are minutes you could have spent obsessing about sex like the rest of us.


Quote

Originally posted by: arcimedes
If you think spending a couple of minutes a day pointing out the facts is "obsessive" then you and I have different definitions. Refuting the lies of Singer and his supporters is a trivial exercise.


I guess we do have different definitions.

Have you ever come across a Singer related thread and not bothered to reply and refute information that you know is incorrect because it is the same old dead horse again and again?
Quote

Originally posted by: KayPea
Quote

Originally posted by: arcimedes
If you think spending a couple of minutes a day pointing out the facts is "obsessive" then you and I have different definitions. Refuting the lies of Singer and his supporters is a trivial exercise.


I guess we do have different definitions.

Have you ever come across a Singer related thread and not bothered to reply and refute information that you know is incorrect because it is the same old dead horse again and again?


I don't respond to everything. Remember the Singer alias who thought I had him on ignore because I didn't respond to his posts?

That said, it does depend on the situation. You have to keep in mind that irritating a narcissist like Singer is just so much fun.
Quote

Originally posted by: KayPea
Quote

Originally posted by: arcimedes
If you think spending a couple of minutes a day pointing out the facts is "obsessive" then you and I have different definitions. Refuting the lies of Singer and his supporters is a trivial exercise.


I guess we do have different definitions.

Have you ever come across a Singer related thread and not bothered to reply and refute information that you know is incorrect because it is the same old dead horse again and again?


No shit! AND,to repeat over and over and over again,that "i've done the math,it doesn't work".
I agree. "GEESH"

J

PS And also this obsesion with saying how much MLA "adores "his system. Bull shit,all the guy did was report on it(albeit in a way thta seemed to piss everyone off,BUT the EXACT same thing frank k. was going to do. Tha ONLY difference was frank announced who he was from the git-go. GEESH again.

J
Perceptive people understand that the only problem is that the dead donkey keeps braying.

Here's the solution:

"Yes, I agree that the machines are random, and thus past results have no bearing on future results. Yes, I agree that although leaving the casino and returning later might have some emotional/psychological effect, it has no effect on total win or loss. Yes, I agree that all the machines are equally random, so no rational person would prefer one machine to another, unless the games or payouts were different; nor prefer two machines to one. Yes, I agree that the only skills involved are finding the best payouts and holding the best cards. Yes, I agree that machines cannot be out-thought, out-played, out-maneuvered, tricked, nor manipulated. Etc., etc."
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
PS And also this obsesion with saying how much MLA "adores "his system. Bull shit,all the guy did was report on it(albeit in a way thta seemed to piss everyone off,BUT the EXACT same thing frank k. was going to do. Tha ONLY difference was frank announced who he was from the git-go. GEESH again.

J


Sorry I forced you read all my comments. Does your wrist still hurt from all the twisting I did?

All I have done related to the posts Money made is respond to statements Money made. His statements were incorrect. I corrected them. If you can't handle that then I guess I'd recommend you look in a mirror and figure out why you don't want to know the facts.

If I repeated the same things over and over it was simply because Money kept making the same incorrect assertions over and over. Maybe your comments should be directed towards him and why he refused to accept the facts.

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
PS And also this obsesion with saying how much MLA "adores "his system. Bull shit,all the guy did was report on it


moneyla wanted singers system inside him.



Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now