Vegas Free-for-All - Security very important???

Security very important???

malibber

Jan 10, 2011
3:52am

Could you point to me in the constitution where corporations are entitled to free speech?

Quote

Originally posted by: MaddyHLVA
I'm from the government and I'm here to help,

just give up some more of your rights and I will help I promise.

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety..

Really is sad when either side tries to restrict FREE SPEECH...

Gotta question a person smarts when he wants any kind of speech outlawed...

MaddyHLVA

Jan 10, 2011
3:59am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber
We could remove hate speech on the public airwaves, fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches, fully fund mental health and so forth, but I am sure all of these common sense measures will fail so we are probably left with extending secret service type protection to members of congress and federal judges at an astronomical cost as the first poster suggested.

Where in this post do you mention a Corp?

Im I missing something?

fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches

Mal your way off base here bud, even Forkie said it....

MisterPicture

Jan 10, 2011
4:04am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber
Could you point to me in the constitution where corporations are entitled to free speech?...

So you'd be censoring newpapers? Blogs that accept advertising? Films and television? No thanks - I'd prefer the violent political rhetoric to your solution.

I'd like to think our Constitution can survive the haters who target gunsights at their political opponents, who advise their supporters to "reload," and who talk about using "Second Amendment" rememdies to remedy the results at the ballot box.

malibber

Jan 10, 2011
4:09am

Block User

The first post was a thumbnail sketch not a comprehensive guide as to how something should be done. I think you have to be careful when it comes to placing restrictions on the 1st amendment. You might note I made several other recommendations. But like I said common sense will not prevail and we will end up extending secret service like protection to every member of congress, and every federal judge plus their families at an enormous cost. Likewise all State Governments will have to fund the secret service like protection of their elected officials.

Quote

Originally posted by: MaddyHLVA

Quote
Originally posted by: malibber
We could remove hate speech on the public airwaves, fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches, fully fund mental health and so forth, but I am sure all of these common sense measures will fail so we are probably left with extending secret service type protection to members of congress and federal judges at an astronomical cost as the first poster suggested.

Where in this post do you mention a Corp?

Im I missing something?

fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches

Mal your way off base here bud, even Forkie said it....

jhowell

Jan 10, 2011
4:13am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber
We could fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches.

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Barack Obama 6/13/2008

Would you fine him?

https://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/06/obama_philadelphia_fundraiser.html

MaddyHLVA

Jan 10, 2011
4:15am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber
The first post was a thumbnail sketch not a comprehensive guide as to how something should be done. I think you have to be careful when it comes to placing restrictions on the 1st amendment. You might note I made several other recommendations. But like I said common sense will not prevail and we will end up extending secret service like protection to every member of congress, and every federal judge plus their families at an enormous cost. Likewise all State Governments will have to fund the secret service like protection of their elected officials.

Quote
Originally posted by: MaddyHLVA
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber
We could remove hate speech on the public airwaves, fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches, fully fund mental health and so forth, but I am sure all of these common sense measures will fail so we are probably left with extending secret service type protection to members of congress and federal judges at an astronomical cost as the first poster suggested.

I cant really have an adult conversation with you until you check some of your facts..

THE STATES PAY ZERO ZILCH NOTTA, when it comes to elected FEDERAL OFFICALS..

Ill post more but since your the one running at the gums why dont you google who protects Elected Federal

Officals when they are at a town hall meeting. ( Offical must request it though its not like its 24/7)

Where in this post do you mention a Corp?

Im I missing something?

fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches

Mal your way off base here bud, even Forkie said it....

snidely333

Jan 10, 2011
4:33am

Block User

Ban them there violent video games and that damn rock and roll devil music.

Violent wackos are going to cause problems now and then. Don't take away my rights with your nanny government.

malibber

Jan 10, 2011
4:39am

Block User

You’re taking everything I said out of the context in which I intended it to be taken, and prehaps that is my falut for my choice of wording. In any event it seems rather pointless to argue with you. I love your trip reports, but let’s just say we disagree on this issue.

Quote

Originally posted by: MaddyHLVA

Quote
Originally posted by: malibber
The first post was a thumbnail sketch not a comprehensive guide as to how something should be done. I think you have to be careful when it comes to placing restrictions on the 1st amendment. You might note I made several other recommendations. But like I said common sense will not prevail and we will end up extending secret service like protection to every member of congress, and every federal judge plus their families at an enormous cost. Likewise all State Governments will have to fund the secret service like protection of their elected officials.

Quote
Originally posted by: MaddyHLVA
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber
We could remove hate speech on the public airwaves, fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches, fully fund mental health and so forth, but I am sure all of these common sense measures will fail so we are probably left with extending secret service type protection to members of congress and federal judges at an astronomical cost as the first poster suggested.

I cant really have an adult conversation with you until you check some of your facts..

THE STATES PAY ZERO ZILCH NOTTA, when it comes to elected FEDERAL OFFICALS..

Ill post more but since your the one running at the gums why dont you google who protects Elected Federal

Officals when they are at a town hall meeting. ( Offical must request it though its not like its 24/7)

Where in this post do you mention a Corp?

Im I missing something?

fine candidates who use gun metaphors in their ads, and/or speeches

Mal your way off base here bud, even Forkie said it....

‹2

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now