Speech Suppression

Quickly file a lawsuit against the tractor manufacturer before the bruise fades.
Use no burn balm. No burn balm!

Well, that is the answer to: What would Donald Trump do?

Well said, DonDiego! And far be it from me to stand by the integrity of a Breitbart.com reporter. Amusingly, Its worth noting that DonDiego's convicton of Hillary Clinton's corruption on this thread is not born out by any verdict in a court of law. I guess Hillary doesn't get the same benefit from DonDiego as the staff of Donald Trump's campaign. No worries - I'm sure she'll get over it.

My greater point is this: In a society where money and special interests frequently drown out the voices of the greater public people have two ways to respond: peaceful protests or violent protests. Liberals have a long and proud history of doing the former. Tea partiers are more likely to engage in the latter - .....and now they have a candidate that is egging them on. See the myriad of examples I posted.

I'd be seriously concerned if I thought Trump had a snowball's chance in hell at being the next president. I haven't seen any data that makes me remotely consider that possibility yet.

And here I thought it was you being the hypocrite by accusing the Trump campaign of assault with no hearing, no verdict, no evidence....after all these months of defending Hillary from unproven allegations. Ok. I'm right.

But PJ you should know by now that for being part of the Republican inner circle you have to:

a) be a liar (like Donald Trump)
b) be perfectly ok with judging people based on a double standard (like DD has shown in this thread)
c) be an incredible hypocrite (you know, calling HC a liar while Trump lies like there's no tomorrow)
d) act like a victim of everything those evil, agressive liberals do (you know like punching Republicans in the face at a HC campaign gathering)

You are a very patient man PJ. I respect your efforts to talk some sense into people who appear to have the intelligence of an onion. But, unfortunately I'm afraid you're getting nowhere with this bunch.

I'm just wondering if our board liberals think that rushing a stage or jumping a barricade are also part of free speech?

I understand the whole Simple solutions for Simple minds principle, so let me ask you this?

Are you opposed to allowing the Patriot Guards protesting to the level that prevents the Westboro Church from staging a political rally near a funeral?
If demonstrators have rights, why don't counter demonstrators have the same rights?
Perhaps if you could explain to me why you think the rights of those gathered at a political rally are more important than those of demonstrators, we might be able to have an exchange, but stamping your foot and voting no does nothing to expand the discussion.

Both groups have the right to demonstrate but not at the expense of another group. Liberals think their message is more important than people with differing views who should be quiet.