Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
Is there any proof that Trump opening a bottle of champagne and pouring it over the bunny logo was recorded in conjunction with the recording of any "sexually explicit" material? That tiny clip could have been recorded during any event having anything having to do with Playboy. Can you find Trump listed in the USC 2257 files for this particular video?
Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
People that produce movies and or photographs that include any of these acts are required to keep records of anyone depicted in these works including their real names, their addresses and copies of their photo ids showing that they were at least 18 at the time the depiction was created. You can find this in USC 2257. Even though Trump didn't appear nude in the in the Playboy video, if the video were shot under current law, the producer of that video would be required to keep Donald's Id and address on file for government inspection because the work itself would be considered sexually explicit.
Is there any proof that Trump opening a bottle of champagne and pouring it over the bunny logo was recorded in conjunction with the recording of any "sexually explicit" material? That tiny clip could have been recorded during any event having anything having to do with Playboy. Can you find Trump listed in the USC 2257 files for this particular video?
Yes Bob, Mr. Trump was apparently not on the same sound stage where the naked ladies were groping each other. That's why they call it editing.
