Syrian Refugees

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
DonDiego checked on the assertion above that the States cannot refuse to accept immigrants who are permitted into the USA by the Administration; it seems to be accurate. [DonDiego would normally cite applicable court cases, but he suspects no one looks at his citations anyway.]
About all the States can do is not co-operate, i.e. a State cannot be forced to spend State funds in the effort to accept/settle refugees.

The original question proposed here was with reference to increasing immigration specifically for Syrian refugees, . . . good news or not? Given the present situation of an increasing number of Muslims worldwide embracing the idea of destroying Non-Muslim Western Civilization as an appropriate religious grand design DonDiego suggests it is likely not a good idea.

The central question: How does one "vet" a potential immigrant? Based upon what? What information is available on those requesting asylum? What records exist? What confidence can be placed in the records? It's not like they've got a credit-rating score on Equifax, TransUnion and Experian?

There are significant potential dangers in accepting such refugees unlike any in earlier immigration exercises.


Poor wily old DonDiego is advised to watch the beginning of Scarface, starring Al Pacino, Michelle Pfeiffer, and Steven Bauer for a dramatized example of a vetting process.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"and a few years later we rounded up Mexicans and flung them over the border - more deaths were involved."

WHAT?


The Malibber school of posting, start making shit up, the more embellished with own personal beleifs, the better.


I can always back up my posts with an informed source. And if you think it was made up then you are an incredibly ignorant student of history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback

But speaking of people making shit up on these boards - do you still have that NY Post article about Obama fudging the unemployment numbers?


Oh it's completely true. The US sent 'em back and there were deaths involved. Of course if they had not decided to break the law in the first place there would have been no need for the operation wetback. If people would just follow the rules instead of trying to jump ahead of everyone else to the front of the line there would not be a problem and innocent others would not get caught up in the consequences.

It's a big crowded world we live in. it's only going to get worse. Much worse as long as bleeding heart "progressives" get to keep failing with every idea they put forward.

The Syrian refugees do not really want to be in the US. Not really. Not the way you think they do. Their own religion, which demands exact adherence, forbids it. That does not mean that they should not have a safe place to live. That does not mean we should not help them. We can and we should help them, by giving them their country back.
But no, you're against that too. Go ahead and be against it but don't spout that BULLSHIT about other people's sons. Only someone with no experience, no honor and no sense of duty would even think that.
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
[DonDiego would normally cite applicable court cases, but he suspects no one looks at his citations anyway.]
q]

I always check your cites. Especially legal ones.......It's nice to have access to someone else's Westlaw account.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"and a few years later we rounded up Mexicans and flung them over the border - more deaths were involved."

WHAT?


The Malibber school of posting, start making shit up, the more embellished with own personal beleifs, the better.


malibber cites his sources more often than anyone on this board.

Question for the group......if Syrian refugees are brought here, how will they support themselves and their families?

Let's see, their culture is completely different from what they will find here. They don't speak the language, I'm assuming not many Syrian's speak English. Perhaps, their wives can find jobs.....oh, that won't work.

I'm puzzled. Wouldn't everyone be better off if the US under Obama's strong leadership found a safe haven for the refugees over there?

Or am I missing an important piece to the puzzle?
Quote

Originally posted by: lvfritz
Question for the group......if Syrian refugees are brought here, how will they support themselves and their families?

Let's see, their culture is completely different from what they will find here. They don't speak the language, I'm assuming not many Syrian's speak English. Perhaps, their wives can find jobs.....oh, that won't work.

I'm puzzled. Wouldn't everyone be better off if the US under Obama's strong leadership found a safe haven for the refugees over there?

Or am I missing an important piece to the puzzle?


A. Taxpayers will support them. If they get jobs, won't they be taking jobs away from honest, hard-working Americans.
B. I don't know why you think the women will find employment easier of if their culture will not allow that.
C. You underestimate the severity of the situation and have some delusion that Obama could have prevented this refugee catastrophe. There is no easy simplistic solution to this. No one in the WH could have done better; I mean, there is fighting in Syria and all the sides suck. There was no side for us to support.

It's not on the news nightly, but what happened in Paris on Friday, happens in Syria very often. That's why the people are running away. There is/was civil war is Syria that have torn the country apart.

Oops, I forgot what I was going to say.
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"and a few years later we rounded up Mexicans and flung them over the border - more deaths were involved."

WHAT?


The Malibber school of posting, start making shit up, the more embellished with own personal beleifs, the better.


malibber cites his sources more often than anyone on this board.

Like George Bush is the co-founder of ISIS?

Ă˜bama won't even call them ISIS, so what exactly did Bush co-found?
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"and a few years later we rounded up Mexicans and flung them over the border - more deaths were involved."

WHAT?


The Malibber school of posting, start making shit up, the more embellished with own personal beleifs, the better.


malibber cites his sources more often than anyone on this board.


I dunno Mal, you seem to spout your own opinions and theory's more than much referenced posting.
I must still be missing something......
Why bring people half way around the world, so that the taxpayers can support them here? Taking jobs away? WHAT JOBS? Why not protect them there, in surrounding somewhat familiar to them? Europe has taken many in, what about other Muslim countries in the region? I'm not heartless......I just don't see how anybody wins by bringing them here.

No, I don't think Obama can fix the situation, I think Obama CAUSED the situation!
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now