Team Hillary’s final e-mail defense: mass amnesia

Jatki-
If I asked you when you first became aware of me, could you provide a definitive answer? But you expect her aid to know exactly when he became aware of something years after the fact.
You quote an oped from a paper owned by Rubert Murdoch and then another from different paper owned by the same guy. a guy whose hatred for all things clinton has been well known for twenty plus years.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
"Yes - she hit the "delete" button after reading her emails like every user on the planet.....including you, Hoops. What are you hiding in your recycle bin? "

Oh and another thing, hitting delete, like the rest of us, is a huge no no especially at that level, all email correspondence is supposed to be preserved and saved or am I mistaken there? That's right, the hillary is above all that tedious record keeping. It's BS also about you saying she didn't attempt to have her server wiped clean, that's already been established by the FBI (which should carry an obstruction of justice tag).


Source for the wiped server please? (Just a note....if her server was wiped then her deleted emails would not have been recovered. Thats what wiping a server does). Ill give you the opportunity to retract. And no, its not against state department rules to hit the delete button. And it happens every day. Deleted emails are archived and recoverable just like they are in the case of Hillary Clinton.

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The cover-up! The cover-up! Is anyone ever going to tell me exactly what Hillary was covering up? Because all of her emails have been made available to the investigation now - you know, the ones our resident wing nuts promised us held super secret criminal activity that Hillary wanted hidden from the public....

Be honest Jatki - you and the NY Post have been forced to concede the fact that Hillary wasn't hiding anything in her emails. You're grand conspiracy has been reduced to the fact that she broke state department rules with her private server. The problem with that is - once you get outside the birther-sphere nobody gives a crap.


The big problem with your denial now PJ is that it's surfacing that there were in fact classified docs run through her private mail. That's way more than breaking a few rules.
Deny all you want, I also know for a fact how smart a guy you are and for your lefty reasons you will deny any person on the lefts guilt, no matter how obvious.

..and I am being honest, you're the one not being honest my friend.


Ok...so you are still standing by the impending criminal indicment ...any day now, right? Since you're so positive that her actions go beyond breaking rules and fall into the category of "being illegal" then you can tell me specifically what law was broken. Please help me out...none of your friends have been able to answer.

The classified emails have been aknown quantity for a year now as well....and they were classified after they were sent which is a point that you and every right wing pundit forgets to mention. What was that you were saying about mass amnesia?

I hope you have a new conspiracy ready to put forward. Email-gate is running on empty


I never said she would be indicted, I am saying that I'm positive she broke the law(s). Hell everyone who isn't in complete denial knows she broke the law.


well then its is an easy answer to tell me what law was broken and yet you seem to struggle here.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Yes - she hit the "delete" button after reading her emails like every user on the planet.....including you, Hoops. What are you hiding in your recycle bin?

And her emails have since been recovered .... And they dont show the nefarious activity that Hoops has promised us took place. Nor is there any evidence that her server was wiped as people made up and posted on this board. And Hoops,like jatki, cant bring himself to acknowledge that her emails were classified after being sent. So what were you saying about being dishonest, Hoops?

Not only has she not been convicted of any crime.....she has not even been charged with one. But you are free to be upset anyway. It makes about as much sense as being upset about Obama's tee time at the links.


So what do you think of the WH finally acknowledging that it is in fact a criminal investigation? If she did nothing illegal then why in the world would the FBI (and finally) the WH declare it criminal? They don't label it criminal if only some rules were broken, correct PJ?


Wow! So you've moved the goal posts now completely off the field. You dont have to be convicted of a crime to be guilty. You dont even have to be charged with a crime to be guilty. You just have to be questioned in a criminal investigation to be guilty...and it doesn't even matter if you cant say what the alleged crime is .....


really? Thats the crux of your argument? Good luck in November

PJ, "denial" is not a river in Egypt - but in your case, it is a permanent state of mind.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The cover-up! The cover-up! Is anyone ever going to tell me exactly what Hillary was covering up? Because all of her emails have been made available to the investigation now - you know, the ones our resident wing nuts promised us held super secret criminal activity that Hillary wanted hidden from the public....

Be honest Jatki - you and the NY Post have been forced to concede the fact that Hillary wasn't hiding anything in her emails. You're grand conspiracy has been reduced to the fact that she broke state department rules with her private server. The problem with that is - once you get outside the birther-sphere nobody gives a crap.


The big problem with your denial now PJ is that it's surfacing that there were in fact classified docs run through her private mail. That's way more than breaking a few rules.
Deny all you want, I also know for a fact how smart a guy you are and for your lefty reasons you will deny any person on the lefts guilt, no matter how obvious.

..and I am being honest, you're the one not being honest my friend.


Ok...so you are still standing by the impending criminal indicment ...any day now, right? Since you're so positive that her actions go beyond breaking rules and fall into the category of "being illegal" then you can tell me specifically what law was broken. Please help me out...none of your friends have been able to answer.

The classified emails have been aknown quantity for a year now as well....and they were classified after they were sent which is a point that you and every right wing pundit forgets to mention. What was that you were saying about mass amnesia?

I hope you have a new conspiracy ready to put forward. Email-gate is running on empty


"then you can tell me specifically what law was broken."

Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information
Violation of 18 USC Sec. 1924, which outlaws the unauthorized removal and storage of classified information.
Violation of 18 U.S.C. 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

Plus several DOD regulations she is subject to as she had access to military intelligence.

You know, perhaps this is a really petty of me to focus on, but when Hillary was asked if she wiped the server clean and she responded "what? You mean like with a cloth or something?" I found that incredibly insulting.

Not funny in any way. If she was making a joke that's pathetic (both that she tried to make a joke in that situation and that she thought that was FUNNY). And if she was being serious and thought that "wiping a server" meant with a cloth then she's too stupid to have a position much higher than a janitor. Kids everywhere could figure out what wiping something meant when you were talking about electronics.

It's always pissed me off.

Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Jatki-
If I asked you when you first became aware of me, could you provide a definitive answer? But you expect her aid to know exactly when he became aware of something years after the fact.
You quote an oped from a paper owned by Rubert Murdoch and then another from different paper owned by the same guy. a guy whose hatred for all things clinton has been well known for twenty plus years.


No, I wouldn't remember when I first became aware of you Billy, but ask 222 questions about you and I could probably answer most. If I said I don't remember or I don't recall I would bet you might think I was hiding something, don't ya think?

I wonder how many times people need to post the law before PJ will stop asking "What laws did Hillary break". I believe that we are now at 29, and counting.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The cover-up! The cover-up! Is anyone ever going to tell me exactly what Hillary was covering up? Because all of her emails have been made available to the investigation now - you know, the ones our resident wing nuts promised us held super secret criminal activity that Hillary wanted hidden from the public....

Be honest Jatki - you and the NY Post have been forced to concede the fact that Hillary wasn't hiding anything in her emails. You're grand conspiracy has been reduced to the fact that she broke state department rules with her private server. The problem with that is - once you get outside the birther-sphere nobody gives a crap.


The big problem with your denial now PJ is that it's surfacing that there were in fact classified docs run through her private mail. That's way more than breaking a few rules.
Deny all you want, I also know for a fact how smart a guy you are and for your lefty reasons you will deny any person on the lefts guilt, no matter how obvious.

..and I am being honest, you're the one not being honest my friend.


Okay, there it is. PJ has now been shown which laws were broken by Hillary for the 30th time. How long until he, once again, asks "Which laws did Hillary break?"


Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The cover-up! The cover-up! Is anyone ever going to tell me exactly what Hillary was covering up? Because all of her emails have been made available to the investigation now - you know, the ones our resident wing nuts promised us held super secret criminal activity that Hillary wanted hidden from the public....

Be honest Jatki - you and the NY Post have been forced to concede the fact that Hillary wasn't hiding anything in her emails. You're grand conspiracy has been reduced to the fact that she broke state department rules with her private server. The problem with that is - once you get outside the birther-sphere nobody gives a crap.


The big problem with your denial now PJ is that it's surfacing that there were in fact classified docs run through her private mail. That's way more than breaking a few rules.
Deny all you want, I also know for a fact how smart a guy you are and for your lefty reasons you will deny any person on the lefts guilt, no matter how obvious.

..and I am being honest, you're the one not being honest my friend.


Ok...so you are still standing by the impending criminal indicment ...any day now, right? Since you're so positive that her actions go beyond breaking rules and fall into the category of "being illegal" then you can tell me specifically what law was broken. Please help me out...none of your friends have been able to answer.

The classified emails have been aknown quantity for a year now as well....and they were classified after they were sent which is a point that you and every right wing pundit forgets to mention. What was that you were saying about mass amnesia?

I hope you have a new conspiracy ready to put forward. Email-gate is running on empty


"then you can tell me specifically what law was broken."

Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information
Violation of 18 USC Sec. 1924, which outlaws the unauthorized removal and storage of classified information.
Violation of 18 U.S.C. 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

Plus several DOD regulations she is subject to as she had access to military intelligence.


Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now