Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
well then its is an easy answer to tell me what law was broken and yet you seem to struggle here.
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99Quote
Originally posted by: pjstrohQuote
Originally posted by: jatki99Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
The cover-up! The cover-up! Is anyone ever going to tell me exactly what Hillary was covering up? Because all of her emails have been made available to the investigation now - you know, the ones our resident wing nuts promised us held super secret criminal activity that Hillary wanted hidden from the public....
Be honest Jatki - you and the NY Post have been forced to concede the fact that Hillary wasn't hiding anything in her emails. You're grand conspiracy has been reduced to the fact that she broke state department rules with her private server. The problem with that is - once you get outside the birther-sphere nobody gives a crap.
The big problem with your denial now PJ is that it's surfacing that there were in fact classified docs run through her private mail. That's way more than breaking a few rules.
Deny all you want, I also know for a fact how smart a guy you are and for your lefty reasons you will deny any person on the lefts guilt, no matter how obvious.
..and I am being honest, you're the one not being honest my friend.
Ok...so you are still standing by the impending criminal indicment ...any day now, right? Since you're so positive that her actions go beyond breaking rules and fall into the category of "being illegal" then you can tell me specifically what law was broken. Please help me out...none of your friends have been able to answer.
The classified emails have been aknown quantity for a year now as well....and they were classified after they were sent which is a point that you and every right wing pundit forgets to mention. What was that you were saying about mass amnesia?
I hope you have a new conspiracy ready to put forward. Email-gate is running on empty
I never said she would be indicted, I am saying that I'm positive she broke the law(s). Hell everyone who isn't in complete denial knows she broke the law.
well then its is an easy answer to tell me what law was broken and yet you seem to struggle here.
What law was broken? Seriously? She had a home brewed server and received classified mail on it, and "not after the fact" either, it has come to light she received mail that had the classification of classified on it. Is it proven she broke any laws YET? of course not, everyone is innocent 'til proven guilty, but again the fact remains, she is being investigated criminally, not just a few broken rules. I have no idea why this escapes you (well yea I do).
