This can't be a good sign for Vegas

jenaphir, are you on the rag today?
only an idiot would ask that. no surprise it was you.
youre right jenaphir, I am an idiot. there was no need for me to ask the question.
Las Vegas has seen its Golden Age. With Asian markets, Indian casinos, the stupid end of themed places LV is due for some serious contraction which will accelerate if California and Arizona ever smarten up and allow "real" casinos.

melbedewy gets a gold star for calling it right. If California ever allowed "real casino gaming" Vegas would lose 40% of its market overnight. of course it was the Vegas casinos that funded the campaign to stop the gaming expansion in California when it was on the ballot a few years ago.

the card clubs like Commerce, Bike, Hollywood Park would love to have full casino gaming but have abandoned any plans to campaign for it again. If its going to happen it will have to start with the State Legislature's desire to increase state revenue.

The Indian casinos would fight it, and so would some communities in Calif. Even residents around Hollywood Park (near LAX) would not vote to approve a gaming expansion there.

Arnold considered it. I dont know how the current administration feels about it.
Something good for Vegas?

In 2010 Pennsylvania approved temporary-standard Blackjack Rules; they are very good rules for players !

"These Pennsylvania rules are particularly advantageous to players:
• Blackjacks will be paid off at 3-to-2 ($15 for a $10 bet).
• Dealer must stand on soft 17 (for example, a hand of Ace-6).
• Players may double down on any two cards (some sites limit doubling to hands totaling 9, 10 or 11).
• Doubling after splitting pairs is allowed.
• Late surrender is allowed (giving up half your bet after the dealer checks the hole card for a blackjack)"
Ref: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

This year, . . . in June, . . . the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board will establish permanent-standard Blackjack Rules. BlackjackChamp.com has reported that the casino lobbyists are pushing to change the 3-to-2 natural payout to 6-to-5 and the "stand on all 17s" rule to "hit soft 17". At least one member of the PGCB has indicated the original rules are likely to remain unchanged.

Pennsylvania might well attract/retain more players if it formalizes the initial rules, . . . maybe even poor old DonDiego would prefer to play in Podunk, PA over distant Las Vegas.
(n.b. Nothing in this post should be taken as any indication of DonDiego's location; he may live in the Appalachian portion of Pennsylvania, a subset of "Pennsyltucky", or he may reside elsewhere in Appalachia.)
MoneyLA- your comment to jenaphir was uncalled for. Even though you admitted to being "an idiot" and that there was no need to ask the question, you did not apologize. I just wonder what, in your mind, gives you the right to say what you said.
Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLA jenaphir, are you on the rag today?

Well, I don't know if she's on the rag today or not, but your observation reminds me of a joke.

How can you tell when a girl from West Virginia is on the rag?

She's only wearing one sock.

LOL.


Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Something good for Vegas?

In 2010 Pennsylvania approved temporary-standard Blackjack Rules; they are very good rules for players !

"These Pennsylvania rules are particularly advantageous to players:
• Blackjacks will be paid off at 3-to-2 ($15 for a $10 bet).
• Dealer must stand on soft 17 (for example, a hand of Ace-6).
• Players may double down on any two cards (some sites limit doubling to hands totaling 9, 10 or 11).
• Doubling after splitting pairs is allowed.
• Late surrender is allowed (giving up half your bet after the dealer checks the hole card for a blackjack)"
Ref: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

This year, . . . in June, . . . the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board will establish permanent-standard Blackjack Rules. BlackjackChamp.com has reported that the casino lobbyists are pushing to change the 3-to-2 natural payout to 6-to-5 and the "stand on all 17s" rule to "hit soft 17". At least one member of the PGCB has indicated the original rules are likely to remain unchanged.

Pennsylvania might well attract/retain more players if it formalizes the initial rules, . . . maybe even poor old DonDiego would prefer to play in Podunk, PA over distant Las Vegas.
(n.b. Nothing in this post should be taken as any indication of DonDiego's location; he may live in the Appalachian portion of Pennsylvania, a subset of "Pennsyltucky", or he may reside elsewhere in Appalachia.)



Cant talk for anyone else but.... I used to be a 48 time a year vistor to Vegas, TI and Mirage... Loved free booze, great parties and lots of fine (easy to take off their pants) women.. I was younger then didnt care about gaming odds... Comps were coming fast and easy.. Yet as I grow older( the nasty number 30 is here in 6 months) Vegas trips had been cut by almost 80% just go now for the WSOP,SB, March Madness and NFL week 1 and New Years Eve... Why put up with the TSA feeling up my package, tighted comps and a 4.5 hour flight.... Just 1 hour away I have a casino that offer better odds on BJ then 95% of strip casinos.
I play 100 bones a hand in Erie( Presqle Isle Casino) for about 4 hours and Im showered with love... Free hotels, round trip limo, 300 Food Credit, 125 booze credit and 300 dollar a week promo chips or free play... And best of all my HOST greets me every time at the door.... Cant recall when the last time my host at TI or the Mirage greeted me or even said Hi!
Jenaphir I am sorry I said you are on the rag. And I hope you can get over what Sheldon did to you.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now