Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

Trump proposes Second Amendment solution for Hillary if she wins the election.

alanleroyII
alanleroyII
Aug 9, 2016
12:23pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Well he did say he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and his supporters wouldn't care. We just didn't know he was talking about Hillary.

But seriously folks....

Here is what Trump said:
“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

Here is how a rational person would interpret that: "Maybe 2nd Amendment supporters could protest and bring political pressure so the Senate denies her appointments".
Here is what Malibber, PJ and Forkie heard. "Just Shoot her"
Mr. Trump's preamble “By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks," PRESUPPOSES that Hillary has been elected president and that she has the votes in the Senate. At that point, there's only one way "Second Amendment supporters" could change things.
How does 'picking her judges' in any way PRESUPPOSE she has the votes in the Senate?...
The part about "nothing you can do, folks" presupposes it.
Maybe in your Trump Fantasy World it does.
jphelan
jphelan
Aug 9, 2016
2:05pm
Block User
When hearts are full of hate they fill in the blanks in the worst possible manner......and when they have an agenda, they just make sh*t up.
billryan
billryan
Aug 9, 2016
4:21pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Well he did say he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and his supporters wouldn't care. We just didn't know he was talking about Hillary.

But seriously folks....

Here is what Trump said:
“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

Here is how a rational person would interpret that: "Maybe 2nd Amendment supporters could protest and bring political pressure so the Senate denies her appointments".
Here is what Malibber, PJ and Forkie heard. "Just Shoot her"
Mr. Trump's preamble “By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks," PRESUPPOSES that Hillary has been elected president and that she has the votes in the Senate. At that point, there's only one way "Second Amendment supporters" could change things.
How does 'picking her judges' in any way PRESUPPOSE she has the votes in the Senate?...
The part about "nothing you can do, folks" presupposes it.
Maybe in your Trump Fantasy World it does.




I got to say that, while we disagree an awful lot on political stuff, I always thought you were one of the few rightwingers that could make fairly reasonable arguments to back your beliefs.
That was then, as they say. Your defense of Trump is just getting sillier and sillier.
First it was Trump opposed the war. I'm not saying when he opposed it but he did, as an answer to questions about Trumps claim to have warned against it, "for years" as he now claims.
Now this. This is the sort of tripe I expect from people who refer to themselves in the third person.

billryan
billryan
Aug 9, 2016
5:36pm
Block User
[Time]
Will Drabold
August 9, 2016

Donald Trump’s comments Tuesday about “Second Amendment people” could be considered a “veiled threat” against Hillary Clinton, a former top Secret Service official told TIME.

The official said that if they were still working at the U.S. Secret Service, they would contact someone on Trump’s campaign staff to have a conversation about whether the understands the consequences of that rhetoric.

At a rally in Wilmington, N.C., Trump said that if elected Clinton would get to appoint federal judges to lifetime positions, including a vacant seat on the Supreme Court.

“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

The former Secret Service official said they would ask a U.S. attorney to see if Trump broke any laws with the comment.

“Look, this guy is coming pretty close to the edge here,” the official said.

The official added that the Secret Service would have to consider the value of having agents interview Trump. But “if this was some guy off the street and they made that statement, you’d go out and interview them,” the source told TIME. “He’s not gonna act on this. But you don’t know what you’re encouraging other people to do.”

After speaking with TIME, the official added they would “absolutely” interview Donald Trump about his comments. Such interviews are standard procedure for people who the Secret Service believes may have threatened a public official, the source said.

A spokesperson for the Secret Service declined to comment on Trump’s remark.

One Democratic member of Congress specifically called on the Secret Service to investigate Trump.

Don
Don
Aug 9, 2016
8:41pm
Block User
Yum-Yum.

DonDiego loves tripe.
hoops2
hoops2
Aug 9, 2016
9:08pm
Block User
Meanwhile in other news, Omar mateen's father was an invited guest seated directly behind Clinton at a rally yesterday

When questioned about it, as usual she didn't answer the question & walked away.
alanleroyII
alanleroyII
Aug 9, 2016
11:08pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: billryan
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Well he did say he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and his supporters wouldn't care. We just didn't know he was talking about Hillary.

But seriously folks....

Here is what Trump said:
“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

Here is how a rational person would interpret that: "Maybe 2nd Amendment supporters could protest and bring political pressure so the Senate denies her appointments".
Here is what Malibber, PJ and Forkie heard. "Just Shoot her"
Mr. Trump's preamble “By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks," PRESUPPOSES that Hillary has been elected president and that she has the votes in the Senate. At that point, there's only one way "Second Amendment supporters" could change things.
How does 'picking her judges' in any way PRESUPPOSE she has the votes in the Senate?...
The part about "nothing you can do, folks" presupposes it.
Maybe in your Trump Fantasy World it does.




I got to say that, while we disagree an awful lot on political stuff, I always thought you were one of the few rightwingers that could make fairly reasonable arguments to back your beliefs.
That was then, as they say. Your defense of Trump is just getting sillier and sillier.
First it was Trump opposed the war. I'm not saying when he opposed it but he did, as an answer to questions about Trumps claim to have warned against it, "for years" as he now claims.
Now this. This is the sort of tripe I expect from people who refer to themselves in the third person.
Maybe that's because I'm not even a Republican and I think both Democrat and Republican politicians are responsibible for our sad state of affairs. I just call them the way I see them.

Now, I have said that Trump did not Support the Iraq War and Hillary did. That's all I have said and I believe that it is true and important. That was never an 'answer to questions about Trumps claims to have warned against it'. You and Forkush keep trying to change my words to make it such. Why is that? Why can't YOU just admit that Trump did not support the war instead of trying to parse those words and change the point to something else? See, it's because it doesn't fit YOUR political agenda. It's not me it's you.

And on the current topic do you seriously think that Trump is calling for Hillary's assassination? Or is it really just a bunch of political antagonists micro analyzing his every word for their own political gain? Bill, I also thought you and Malibber were reasonable people and I recognize how today's heated political environment can put blinders on what we see. That goes for both of us.

Of course some of the nameless few always wear those blinders. They are the political hacks. I hope I haven't become one. I think Trump is a flawed candidate and I certainly have not supported his every word nor attacked Hillary's every word. I defend him when I think he's right and will continue to do so. I think we have two flawed candidates. Neither of them support my biggest issues which are a Balanced Budget Amendment and Term Limits. I think there is good and bad in each of them. Mostly bad.

Don
Don
Aug 10, 2016
12:35am
Block User
Quote
Maybe that's because I'm not even a Republican and I think both Democrat and Republican politicians are responsibible for our sad state of affairs. I just call them the way I see them.

Now, I have said that Trump did not Support the Iraq War and Hillary did. That's all I have said and I believe that it is true and important. That was never an 'answer to questions about Trumps claims to have warned against it'. You and Forkush keep trying to change my words to make it such. Why is that? Why can't YOU just admit that Trump did not support the war instead of trying to parse those words and change the point to something else? See, it's because it doesn't fit YOUR political agenda. It's not me it's you.

And on the current topic do you seriously think that Trump is calling for Hillary's assassination? Or is it really just a bunch of political antagonists micro analyzing his every word for their own political gain? Bill, I also thought you and Malibber were reasonable people and I recognize how today's heated political environment can put blinders on what we see. That goes for both of us.

Of course some of the nameless few always wear those blinders. They are the political hacks. I hope I haven't become one. I think Trump is a flawed candidate and I certainly have not supported his every word nor attacked Hillary's every word. I defend him when I think he's right and will continue to do so. I think we have two flawed candidates. Neither of them support my biggest issues which are a Balanced Budget Amendment and Term Limits. I think there is good and bad in each of them. Mostly bad.

A calm, well-reasoned political post.

This will not go over well in the LVA Vegas Free-for-All Forum.
MIKEY7777
MIKEY7777
Aug 10, 2016
1:02am
Block User
Are we not talking about the Clinton solution to everything, anyone that crosses them ends up dead!
CowboyKell
CowboyKell
Aug 10, 2016
1:24am
Block User
"PRESUPPOSES"???? Really???

You have to be a complete and total ASS to say this and much worse to believe it. No wonder the LA political crowd brand you as completely nuts. (And that's the crowd on your side)
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now