Vegas Free-for-All - Trump Romps in Nevada

malibber2

Feb 23, 2016
2:40pm

Trump kicked Rubio and Cruz in the teeth with what looks be a 20+ point margin over the number 2 spot which is again is too close to call between Rubio and Cruz. If the 0-4 Rubio eeks out another second place finish, look for Fox News, Wall Street Journal and the rest of the Republican establishment media to spin a another dismal performance as some kind of great victory.

Source

forkushV

Feb 23, 2016
3:21pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Trump kicked Rubio and Cruz in the teeth with what looks be a 20+ point margin over the number 2 spot which is again is too close to call between Rubio and Cruz. If the 0-4 Rubio eeks out another second place finish, look for Fox News, Wall Street Journal and the rest of the Republican establishment media to spin a another dismal performance as some kind of great victory.

Source

Today, we proved the doubters wrong.
— Marco Rubio, age 7, accepting a soccer participation trophy

jatki

Feb 23, 2016
5:05pm

Block User

saw some of the totals and one I thing I found odd about the numbers, Rubio had more votes (13,700) than Clinton (6300) and Sanders (5300) combined. Is there something different in the way Reps hold there gig than the Dems? Or was the voter turnout just that that huge of a difference? Trump had 26,300.

I honestly thought Sanders would've had a big outpouring of support.

Enid Brooks

Feb 24, 2016
12:56am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
saw some of the totals and one I thing I found odd about the numbers, Rubio had more votes (13,700) than Clinton (6300) and Sanders (5300) combined. Is there something different in the way Reps hold there gig than the Dems? Or was the voter turnout just that that huge of a difference? Trump had 26,300.

I honestly thought Sanders would've had a big outpouring of support.

As an independent I find it disgusting that only the Republicans can get the vote out. Come on Democrats you need to round up all your non id carrying voters!! Better yet lets get a decent independent candidate and destroy the old gang of crooks ( both parties!!),

malibber2

Feb 24, 2016
3:11am

Block User

Final margin is Trump beat the second place finisher (Rubio) by 22%.

billryan

Feb 24, 2016
4:27am

Block User

Quote

Other articles say 80,000 people participated in the Democratic caucus.

Stewart

Feb 24, 2016
5:17am

Block User

if dems voter turnout is low, it would be because they have not put forth a desirable candidate. if I had to choose between Hillary and Bern, I would probably just go back to bed. or if in Vegas, maybe go hangout in the casinos.

drmilled

Feb 24, 2016
8:59am

Block User

Apparently the Dems can't be bothered to go out and vote - good, I have had enough of the entitled democrat dweebs who are ruining the country.

billryan

Feb 24, 2016
10:28am

Block User

The Democratic primary was held on a Saturday morning. The Republican was held after work on a Tuesday. In a state wherer registered voters are roughly equal, the party of god managed to have 4,000 people more. Rejoice.

lvfritz

Feb 24, 2016
1:19pm

Block User

So for those keeping score......
Hillary 'tied' in Iowa. Got clobbered in New Hampshire and eked out a 5 point win with very low turnout in Nevada........and can someone remind me what the delegate is on the Democrat side? Doesn't appear to me that the voting process means too much on the Dems side.

1 ›

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now