QuoteWell this comment might have seemed a little more genuine had you actually made it directly after the original 12% lead post instead of replying to my clearly sarcastic addition.
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteOh that's easy! Both the poll showing the 12% lead and the one showing a 2% lead were outlier polls. The composite of the national pollsters shows a Hillary lead of about 7%, and over the last couple presidential elections, the composites have proven to be accurate.
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
OMG! New Quinnipiac poll shows Trump & Clinton in a dead heat! How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?...
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.
QuoteAw, did I hurt your fee-fees?
Originally posted by: alanleroyIIQuoteWell this comment might have seemed a little more genuine had you actually made it directly after the original 12% lead post instead of replying to my clearly sarcastic addition.
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteOh that's easy! Both the poll showing the 12% lead and the one showing a 2% lead were outlier polls. The composite of the national pollsters shows a Hillary lead of about 7%, and over the last couple presidential elections, the composites have proven to be accurate.
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
OMG! New Quinnipiac poll shows Trump & Clinton in a dead heat! How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?...
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.
Now go look up the words 'phony partisan hack'...and look in the mirror.
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteAw, did I hurt your fee-fees?
Originally posted by: alanleroyIIQuoteWell this comment might have seemed a little more genuine had you actually made it directly after the original 12% lead post instead of replying to my clearly sarcastic addition.
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteOh that's easy! Both the poll showing the 12% lead and the one showing a 2% lead were outlier polls. The composite of the national pollsters shows a Hillary lead of about 7%, and over the last couple presidential elections, the composites have proven to be accurate.
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
OMG! New Quinnipiac poll shows Trump & Clinton in a dead heat! How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?...
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.
Now go look up the words 'phony partisan hack'...and look in the mirror.
When you write "phony partisan hack," you're batting about .333, which is pretty good for a batting average, but not so good for a truthfulness average. You've already admitted that the "phony" was incorrect. Unlike, say, phony political "independents" who always back up Republican talking points. No need to name names here, is there alanleroy?
And in political terms, a "hack" is type of phony who sells out his beliefs for personal gain and aggrandizement. Why don't you show me when I've ever done that? Once. So that's a swing and a miss too.
So now we're down to your one accurate word, "partisan." Well gosh, guilty as charged. So in addition to looking up the definition of "outlier," now you should go look up "partisan." Stat.
QuoteFrom where I come from, "fee-fees" is a sarcastic term for feelings. But I looked up the alternative definition, and now we know where alanleroy comes from.
Originally posted by: alanleroyIIQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteAw, did I hurt your fee-fees?
Originally posted by: alanleroyIIQuoteWell this comment might have seemed a little more genuine had you actually made it directly after the original 12% lead post instead of replying to my clearly sarcastic addition.
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteOh that's easy! Both the poll showing the 12% lead and the one showing a 2% lead were outlier polls. The composite of the national pollsters shows a Hillary lead of about 7%, and over the last couple presidential elections, the composites have proven to be accurate.
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
OMG! New Quinnipiac poll shows Trump & Clinton in a dead heat! How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?...
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.
Now go look up the words 'phony partisan hack'...and look in the mirror.
When you write "phony partisan hack," you're batting about .333, which is pretty good for a batting average, but not so good for a truthfulness average. You've already admitted that the "phony" was incorrect. Unlike, say, phony political "independents" who always back up Republican talking points. No need to name names here, is there alanleroy?
And in political terms, a "hack" is type of phony who sells out his beliefs for personal gain and aggrandizement. Why don't you show me when I've ever done that? Once. So that's a swing and a miss too.
So now we're down to your one accurate word, "partisan." Well gosh, guilty as charged. So in addition to looking up the definition of "outlier," now you should go look up "partisan." Stat.
Man I may have to add pervert to the list...talking 'bout my 'fee-fees' and all...
