Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

Trump trailing by 12

alanleroyII
alanleroyII
Jul 2, 2016
11:16pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country. ...
How many times have I mentioned here that Hillary voted to authorize the idiot Iraq War? Or that President Clinton signature repealing Glass Steagall helped create our too-big-to fail financial time bombs? Or referred to Al Sharpton's criminal behavior - way back in 2008? Or dumped on PJ for his admiration of Democrat Dennis Kucinich? Or bragged about how the mostly Democratic and mostly black voters in a congressional district voted for a Republican rather than re-elect their criminal congressman who was caught with tens of thousand of dollars in his freezer?

Obviously alanleroy, you are talking about someone other than myself. Now why don't you have the class to admit it?
Outliers. I think I hurt his fee-fees.

JM2300
JM2300
Jul 2, 2016
11:27pm
Block User
Somewhere there has to be a statue...
forkushV
forkushV
Jul 2, 2016
11:56pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country. ...
How many times have I mentioned here that Hillary voted to authorize the idiot Iraq War? Or that President Clinton signature repealing Glass Steagall helped create our too-big-to fail financial time bombs? Or referred to Al Sharpton's criminal behavior - way back in 2008? Or dumped on PJ for his admiration of Democrat Dennis Kucinich? Or bragged about how the mostly Democratic and mostly black voters in a congressional district voted for a Republican rather than re-elect their criminal congressman who was caught with tens of thousand of dollars in his freezer?

Obviously alanleroy, you are talking about someone other than myself. Now why don't you have the class to admit it?
Outliers. I think I hurt his fee-fees.
No, just waiting for you to man up and back up that claim. Or if you can't, do the honorable thing.

But that isn't how you roll, is it?
alanleroyII
alanleroyII
Jul 3, 2016
2:20am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country. ...
How many times have I mentioned here that Hillary voted to authorize the idiot Iraq War? Or that President Clinton signature repealing Glass Steagall helped create our too-big-to fail financial time bombs? Or referred to Al Sharpton's criminal behavior - way back in 2008? Or dumped on PJ for his admiration of Democrat Dennis Kucinich? Or bragged about how the mostly Democratic and mostly black voters in a congressional district voted for a Republican rather than re-elect their criminal congressman who was caught with tens of thousand of dollars in his freezer?

Obviously alanleroy, you are talking about someone other than myself. Now why don't you have the class to admit it?
Outliers. I think I hurt his fee-fees.
No, just waiting for you to man up and back up that claim. Or if you can't, do the honorable thing.

But that isn't how you roll, is it?


"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country.
- you think its o.k. for judges to legislate from the bench as long as it coincides with your position.
- you won't admit the opposing party probably has as many good and as many bad ideas as your own favorite party.

"you're batting about .333, which is pretty good for a batting average, but not so good for a truthfulness average"

All that aside, you're a partisan hack because of your constant personalization of virtually every political argument. It's all about how you can insult your perceived opposition. That's unlike Malliber and PJ who are both partisans and mix it up occasionally, but don't usually stoop to the Forkush classic false choices like..."Either you're an idiot hypocrite or a perverted liar". I try to point those logical fallacies out whenever I can....and sometimes I go overboard too...but you turn it into a career. Perhaps Partisan Hack is a wrong choice of words. How about Partisan Hack Douchebag?

jatki
jatki
Jul 3, 2016
3:16am
Block User
perfect
forkushV
forkushV
Jul 3, 2016
2:39pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country. ...
How many times have I mentioned here that Hillary voted to authorize the idiot Iraq War? Or that President Clinton signature repealing Glass Steagall helped create our too-big-to fail financial time bombs? Or referred to Al Sharpton's criminal behavior - way back in 2008? Or dumped on PJ for his admiration of Democrat Dennis Kucinich? Or bragged about how the mostly Democratic and mostly black voters in a congressional district voted for a Republican rather than re-elect their criminal congressman who was caught with tens of thousand of dollars in his freezer?

Obviously alanleroy, you are talking about someone other than myself. Now why don't you have the class to admit it?
Outliers. I think I hurt his fee-fees.
No, just waiting for you to man up and back up that claim. Or if you can't, do the honorable thing.

But that isn't how you roll, is it?


"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country.
- you think its o.k. for judges to legislate from the bench as long as it coincides with your position.
- you won't admit the opposing party probably has as many good and as many bad ideas as your own favorite party.

"you're batting about .333, which is pretty good for a batting average, but not so good for a truthfulness average"

All that aside, you're a partisan hack because of your constant personalization of virtually every political argument. It's all about how you can insult your perceived opposition...
How about we take this thread as an example. You mean when you called me a "pervert." Or when when you called me a "phony partisan hack?" Or was it when you called me a "douchebag."

Dude, you suffer from a massive case of projection. I'd get that looked at.
alanleroyII
alanleroyII
Jul 4, 2016
1:47am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country. ...
How many times have I mentioned here that Hillary voted to authorize the idiot Iraq War? Or that President Clinton signature repealing Glass Steagall helped create our too-big-to fail financial time bombs? Or referred to Al Sharpton's criminal behavior - way back in 2008? Or dumped on PJ for his admiration of Democrat Dennis Kucinich? Or bragged about how the mostly Democratic and mostly black voters in a congressional district voted for a Republican rather than re-elect their criminal congressman who was caught with tens of thousand of dollars in his freezer?

Obviously alanleroy, you are talking about someone other than myself. Now why don't you have the class to admit it?
Outliers. I think I hurt his fee-fees.
No, just waiting for you to man up and back up that claim. Or if you can't, do the honorable thing.

But that isn't how you roll, is it?


"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country.
- you think its o.k. for judges to legislate from the bench as long as it coincides with your position.
- you won't admit the opposing party probably has as many good and as many bad ideas as your own favorite party.

"you're batting about .333, which is pretty good for a batting average, but not so good for a truthfulness average"

All that aside, you're a partisan hack because of your constant personalization of virtually every political argument. It's all about how you can insult your perceived opposition...
How about we take this thread as an example. You mean when you called me a "pervert." Or when when you called me a "phony partisan hack?" Or was it when you called me a "douchebag."

Dude, you suffer from a massive case of projection. I'd get that looked at.
How about we take this thread as an example. As always....YOU started with the condescending insults. I simply responded. And in case you hadn't noticed whenever I respond to your insults I kick it up a notch...because that's what you partisan hack douchebags deserve. I guess the truth hurt your fee-fees. Now go look up the word 'asshole'.

forkushV
forkushV
Jul 10, 2016
5:40am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country. ...
How many times have I mentioned here that Hillary voted to authorize the idiot Iraq War? Or that President Clinton signature repealing Glass Steagall helped create our too-big-to fail financial time bombs? Or referred to Al Sharpton's criminal behavior - way back in 2008? Or dumped on PJ for his admiration of Democrat Dennis Kucinich? Or bragged about how the mostly Democratic and mostly black voters in a congressional district voted for a Republican rather than re-elect their criminal congressman who was caught with tens of thousand of dollars in his freezer?

Obviously alanleroy, you are talking about someone other than myself. Now why don't you have the class to admit it?
Outliers. I think I hurt his fee-fees.
No, just waiting for you to man up and back up that claim. Or if you can't, do the honorable thing.

But that isn't how you roll, is it?


"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country.
- you think its o.k. for judges to legislate from the bench as long as it coincides with your position.
- you won't admit the opposing party probably has as many good and as many bad ideas as your own favorite party.

"you're batting about .333, which is pretty good for a batting average, but not so good for a truthfulness average"

All that aside, you're a partisan hack because of your constant personalization of virtually every political argument. It's all about how you can insult your perceived opposition...
How about we take this thread as an example. You mean when you called me a "pervert." Or when when you called me a "phony partisan hack?" Or was it when you called me a "douchebag."

Dude, you suffer from a massive case of projection. I'd get that looked at.
How about we take this thread as an example. As always....YOU started with the condescending insults...
Yes I was condescending; thanks for noticing. So were you with "OMG! [...] How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?.

I responded to your insult by calling you "confused." You responded with "phony partisan hack," "douchebag," "pervert," and now "asshole."

I think that says a lot about the difference between me and you.
rdwoodpecker
rdwoodpecker
Jul 10, 2016
5:59am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
Brexit isn't comparable to an election.
Really? Pollsters polled. People voted. Explain how the Pollsters got it so wrong so close to the vote....and how you think US Pollsters are so right so far away from the vote. You know they use the same techniques....right? Heck they haven't even had a debate yet. That could change everything.
Yeah, I remember how when Trump was leading in the early polls, people claimed that it wouldn't last. They were wrong too.

So far Hillary has invested millions on crucial data mining and microtargeting of demographic groups in swing states. Trump has spent more on baseball caps. Hillary has hundreds of professional boots on the ground. Trump has almost none. To build crowds and harvest volunteers and money in the swing states, Hillary is going to be able to feature rock stars like President Obama, President Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Al Franken, and Joe Biden. Donald Trump will have his wife, Chris Christie and.....Sarah Palin? Hillary will be able to build crowds with the likes of Katy Perry, Beyonce, and Bruce Springsteen. Trump will have Kenny Rogers and Meatloaf. Thousands of California Hillary supporters are going to drive and fly into Nevada to knock on the door of every Democratic voter in the state multiple times. I was one of them in 2008. And the Trump campaign currently has less money in the bank than the defunct Ben Carson campaign.

And the most powerful get-out-the-vote medium in the world, Facebook, has signaled that it is ready to ratfuck the Trump campaign if they think it's necessary (It probably won't be.) Independents are either morons or liars, so TV commercials directed at them are almost worthless.

I've been saying that Donald Trump was going to be the Republican nominee since forever, but Republican primary voters are very different than voters in the general election. I thought Romney had a chance, I thought McCain had a chance (until he chose Palin), but I don't see a way for Trump to win this.



Having "rockstars" going to bat for you in an election would do very little to influence my vote. IT is a sad state that our elections have came to a money grab, not just the Presidential elections either. If it comes to raising money you are right he is in big trouble. I just hope all these "rockstars" get their wallets out to pay for all the free shit the government gives out and is only going to get worse.
rdwoodpecker
rdwoodpecker
Jul 10, 2016
6:07am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
OMG! New Quinnipiac poll shows Trump & Clinton in a dead heat! How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?...
Oh that's easy! Both the poll showing the 12% lead and the one showing a 2% lead were outlier polls. The composite of the national pollsters shows a Hillary lead of about 7%, and over the last couple presidential elections, the composites have proven to be accurate.

Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.



You do have one thing correct just a spelling typo, Hillary is the "outliar and outliar" over and over again she has proved this.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now