Vegas Free-for-All - Trump trailing by 12

Trump trailing by 12

forkushV

Jul 10, 2016
6:16am

Quote

Originally posted by: rdwoodpecker

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
Brexit isn't comparable to an election.
Really? Pollsters polled. People voted. Explain how the Pollsters got it so wrong so close to the vote....and how you think US Pollsters are so right so far away from the vote. You know they use the same techniques....right? Heck they haven't even had a debate yet. That could change everything.
Yeah, I remember how when Trump was leading in the early polls, people claimed that it wouldn't last. They were wrong too.

So far Hillary has invested millions on crucial data mining and microtargeting of demographic groups in swing states. Trump has spent more on baseball caps. Hillary has hundreds of professional boots on the ground. Trump has almost none. To build crowds and harvest volunteers and money in the swing states, Hillary is going to be able to feature rock stars like President Obama, President Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Al Franken, and Joe Biden. Donald Trump will have his wife, Chris Christie and.....Sarah Palin? Hillary will be able to build crowds with the likes of Katy Perry, Beyonce, and Bruce Springsteen. Trump will have Kenny Rogers and Meatloaf. Thousands of California Hillary supporters are going to drive and fly into Nevada to knock on the door of every Democratic voter in the state multiple times. I was one of them in 2008. And the Trump campaign currently has less money in the bank than the defunct Ben Carson campaign.

And the most powerful get-out-the-vote medium in the world, Facebook, has signaled that it is ready to ratfuck the Trump campaign if they think it's necessary (It probably won't be.) Independents are either morons or liars, so TV commercials directed at them are almost worthless.

I've been saying that Donald Trump was going to be the Republican nominee since forever, but Republican primary voters are very different than voters in the general election. I thought Romney had a chance, I thought McCain had a chance (until he chose Palin), but I don't see a way for Trump to win this.

Having "rockstars" going to bat for you in an election would do very little to influence my vote...

They don't influence anyone else either, and like I've said here a few times, endorsements are pretty much worthless when it comes to getting votes. What I did say was that huge rockstar-driven crowds build enthusiasm and allow campaigns to harvest volunteers, money, and the names and addresses of probable voters. And that's critical in any presidential campaign.

Hillary will have, among others, Presidents Obama and Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Springsteen, Katy Perry, and Beyonce. Trump will have Chris Christie and Kenny Rogers. Good luck with that.

alanleroyII

Jul 10, 2016
7:26pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country. ...
How many times have I mentioned here that Hillary voted to authorize the idiot Iraq War? Or that President Clinton signature repealing Glass Steagall helped create our too-big-to fail financial time bombs? Or referred to Al Sharpton's criminal behavior - way back in 2008? Or dumped on PJ for his admiration of Democrat Dennis Kucinich? Or bragged about how the mostly Democratic and mostly black voters in a congressional district voted for a Republican rather than re-elect their criminal congressman who was caught with tens of thousand of dollars in his freezer?

Obviously alanleroy, you are talking about someone other than myself. Now why don't you have the class to admit it?
Outliers. I think I hurt his fee-fees.
No, just waiting for you to man up and back up that claim. Or if you can't, do the honorable thing.

But that isn't how you roll, is it?

"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country.
- you think its o.k. for judges to legislate from the bench as long as it coincides with your position.
- you won't admit the opposing party probably has as many good and as many bad ideas as your own favorite party.

"you're batting about .333, which is pretty good for a batting average, but not so good for a truthfulness average"

All that aside, you're a partisan hack because of your constant personalization of virtually every political argument. It's all about how you can insult your perceived opposition...
How about we take this thread as an example. You mean when you called me a "pervert." Or when when you called me a "phony partisan hack?" Or was it when you called me a "douchebag."

Dude, you suffer from a massive case of projection. I'd get that looked at.
How about we take this thread as an example. As always....YOU started with the condescending insults...

Yes I was condescending; thanks for noticing. So were you with "OMG! [...] How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?.

I responded to your insult by calling you "confused." You responded with "phony partisan hack," "douchebag," "pervert," and now "asshole."

I think that says a lot about the difference between me and you.

Dude...You 'responded to my insult??' Do you take every post I make personally...since I didn't quote you and I wasn't referring to you with my 'OMG' comment. That's kind of creepy. I guess we have to add Dishonest, Lying and Creepy to the list now. I think that says a lot about the difference between me and you...since I am none of those things....except maybe an occasional asshole.

forkushV

Jul 11, 2016
8:44am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country. ...
How many times have I mentioned here that Hillary voted to authorize the idiot Iraq War? Or that President Clinton signature repealing Glass Steagall helped create our too-big-to fail financial time bombs? Or referred to Al Sharpton's criminal behavior - way back in 2008? Or dumped on PJ for his admiration of Democrat Dennis Kucinich? Or bragged about how the mostly Democratic and mostly black voters in a congressional district voted for a Republican rather than re-elect their criminal congressman who was caught with tens of thousand of dollars in his freezer?

Obviously alanleroy, you are talking about someone other than myself. Now why don't you have the class to admit it?
Outliers. I think I hurt his fee-fees.
No, just waiting for you to man up and back up that claim. Or if you can't, do the honorable thing.

But that isn't how you roll, is it?

"You may be a partisan hack if:
- the other side is to blame totally for all that is wrong in the country.
- you think its o.k. for judges to legislate from the bench as long as it coincides with your position.
- you won't admit the opposing party probably has as many good and as many bad ideas as your own favorite party.

"you're batting about .333, which is pretty good for a batting average, but not so good for a truthfulness average"

All that aside, you're a partisan hack because of your constant personalization of virtually every political argument. It's all about how you can insult your perceived opposition...
How about we take this thread as an example. You mean when you called me a "pervert." Or when when you called me a "phony partisan hack?" Or was it when you called me a "douchebag."

Dude, you suffer from a massive case of projection. I'd get that looked at.
How about we take this thread as an example. As always....YOU started with the condescending insults...
Yes I was condescending; thanks for noticing. So were you with "OMG! [...] How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?.

I responded to your insult by calling you "confused." You responded with "phony partisan hack," "douchebag," "pervert," and now "asshole."

I think that says a lot about the difference between me and you.

Dude...You 'responded to my insult??' Do you take every post I make personally...since I didn't quote you and I wasn't referring to you with my 'OMG' comment...

Nope, I didn't take it personally. If I had, I probably would have used a stronger adjective than "confused." On the other hand, for some reason this really has become a deeply personal issue for you, hasn't it? You really should let it go.

I worry about people like you.

alanleroyII

Jul 11, 2016
10:25am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV Nope, I didn't take it personally. If I had, I probably would have used a stronger adjective than "confused." On the other hand, for some reason this really has become a deeply personal issue for you, hasn't it? You really should let it go.

I worry about people like you.

Wait. You obviously took my comment...not addressed to you...not about you....personally. Why else would you respond with your whole fucking condescending insulting holier than thou attitude?.....just like you regularly do to many other posters here. You made it personal right there. Either that or you're just a phony partisan hack douchebag pervert asshole dishonest lying creep...Ok wait a minute.

Bottom line is I decided I'm not going to take your childish bullshit insults anymore, so I responded in kind...no I doubled it...and will continue to pour it on as long as you respond to my baiting. I've got a feeling you secretly like to be called a pervert creep...so I don't expect this to end anytime soon.

Ok...that was wrong...I should apologize...I'm sorry Forkush is a phony partisan hack douchebag pervert asshole dishonest lying creep. Sometimes the truth hurts...I'm afraid I hurt his poor fee-fees. But I'm glad he worries about me. That means I'm in his head.

forkushV

Jul 11, 2016
11:31am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV Nope, I didn't take it personally. If I had, I probably would have used a stronger adjective than "confused." On the other hand, for some reason this really has become a deeply personal issue for you, hasn't it? You really should let it go.

I worry about people like you.

Wait. You obviously took my comment...not addressed to you...not about you....personally...

Dude, I said you were "confused." Try to keep things in perspective, okay?

alanleroyII

Jul 11, 2016
12:20pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV Nope, I didn't take it personally. If I had, I probably would have used a stronger adjective than "confused." On the other hand, for some reason this really has become a deeply personal issue for you, hasn't it? You really should let it go.

I worry about people like you.

Wait. You obviously took my comment...not addressed to you...not about you....personally...

Dude, I said you were "confused." Try to keep things in perspective, okay?

No. You said:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.

See that's just a passive/aggressive insult. That's your style. That's why you are considered an asshole around here. You could have just said the poll was an outlier, but instead you felt the need to insult me. Like you do so many others. It's not funny. It's not clever. It's just you being an asshole. This time I just decided to give it back to you...in spades. And poor little forky the pervet creep can dish it out but can't take it.

forkushV

Jul 11, 2016
12:34pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV Nope, I didn't take it personally. If I had, I probably would have used a stronger adjective than "confused." On the other hand, for some reason this really has become a deeply personal issue for you, hasn't it? You really should let it go.

I worry about people like you.

Wait. You obviously took my comment...not addressed to you...not about you....personally...
Dude, I said you were "confused." Try to keep things in perspective, okay?

No. You said:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.

See that's just a passive/aggressive insult. That's your style. That's why you are considered an asshole around here. You could have just said the poll was an outlier...

Yes, and you could have just pointed out that there were contradictory polls instead of your attempt to demean with "OMG! [...] How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?" See we both do it, and there's nothing wrong with it. Unless you can't keep up and resort to excessive name calling.

You seem to be very angry and thin-skinned these days. Let me guess - you're a Trump supporter, right?

alanleroyII

Jul 11, 2016
11:14pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV Nope, I didn't take it personally. If I had, I probably would have used a stronger adjective than "confused." On the other hand, for some reason this really has become a deeply personal issue for you, hasn't it? You really should let it go.

I worry about people like you.

Wait. You obviously took my comment...not addressed to you...not about you....personally...
Dude, I said you were "confused." Try to keep things in perspective, okay?

No. You said:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.

See that's just a passive/aggressive insult. That's your style. That's why you are considered an asshole around here. You could have just said the poll was an outlier...

What part of "I wasn't talking to you" don't you understand? I wasn't insulting anyone....and I certainly wasn't directing that comment to you. Yet you directly quoted me and felt it necessary to add the little 'go look up the word outlier'....as if I don't know what it means. Like I said...that's not clever...that's not funny...It's just an insult. It's the shit you do all the time here...and there IS something wrong with it. It's no different than me calling you an idiot. It's just more subtle. I'm giving you a taste of your own medicine...only cruder....and harder.....and you can't take it.

I am coming to believe you are an idiot...since you clearly don't understand that you started this little shitfest and I am purposely goading you with more and more 'excessive name calling'---Oh the horror! Wait until I really get nasty. I actually think you're gonna lose sleep over it....I'm worrying you. I'm in your head! Hey! It's empty in here....Where's the fucking light switch?

forkushV

Jul 12, 2016
10:02am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV Nope, I didn't take it personally. If I had, I probably would have used a stronger adjective than "confused." On the other hand, for some reason this really has become a deeply personal issue for you, hasn't it? You really should let it go.

I worry about people like you.

Wait. You obviously took my comment...not addressed to you...not about you....personally...
Dude, I said you were "confused." Try to keep things in perspective, okay?

No. You said:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.

See that's just a passive/aggressive insult. That's your style. That's why you are considered an asshole around here. You could have just said the poll was an outlier...
Yes, and you could have just pointed out that there were contradictory polls instead of your attempt to demean with "OMG! [...] How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?" See we both do it, and there's nothing wrong with it. Unless you can't keep up and resort to excessive name calling.

Dude, the best way to clean spittle off your computer screen is with a damp microfiber cloth. I just have a feeling you could use that advice right about now.

Meanwhile, if in my opinion you make condescending or insulting or stupid comments about me, others on this board, or even about people on your teevee, I may just comment. Deal with it whatever way you like.

alanleroyII

Jul 12, 2016
10:32am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV Nope, I didn't take it personally. If I had, I probably would have used a stronger adjective than "confused." On the other hand, for some reason this really has become a deeply personal issue for you, hasn't it? You really should let it go.

I worry about people like you.

Wait. You obviously took my comment...not addressed to you...not about you....personally...
Dude, I said you were "confused." Try to keep things in perspective, okay?

No. You said:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Now go look up the word "outlier" so next time you aren't so confused.

See that's just a passive/aggressive insult. That's your style. That's why you are considered an asshole around here. You could have just said the poll was an outlier...
Yes, and you could have just pointed out that there were contradictory polls instead of your attempt to demean with "OMG! [...] How in the world did Clinton's 12 point lead evaporate so quickly?" See we both do it, and there's nothing wrong with it. Unless you can't keep up and resort to excessive name calling.
What part of "I wasn't talking to you" don't you understand? I wasn't insulting anyone....and I certainly wasn't directing that comment to you. Yet you directly quoted me and felt it necessary to add the little 'go look up the word outlier'....as if I don't know what it means. Like I said...that's not clever...that's not funny...It's just an insult. It's the shit you do all the time here...and there IS something wrong with it...

Sure...Go ahead and continue behaving like an asshole and expect to be treated like a double asshole. I am dealing with you exactly the way you deserve. You started it by insulting me....just as you do so many here. You could end this by simply not replying...but you don't....because you must like to be insulted..and I'm in your head now...I worry you.

Of course you mean less to me than the turd you are, but I'm glad I've got you worried. I'm glad I'm in your head. And every time you pull your bullshit on me, expect me to kick it up another notch....Because the truth may hurt, but it will set you free. I'm really performing a public service, bro. I'm really helping you to see the error of your ways. If this was the first time you ever pulled this bullshit behavior I would have ignored you. But it's your MO and I hope to help you change.

What are we up to now? Phony partisan hack douchebag pervert asshole dishonest lying creepy idiot turd? I think we've got the bases covered....for now. Sweat Dreams....

«‹9 ›»

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now