Trump warns of another 7-11

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
...
  • I think Forkush will be acting like an idiot.
  • Forkush will probably be acting like an idiot.

    Anyone else see a contradiction? Me neither.

  • WILL BE and CAN PROBABLY BE are very different things. But in the above example, both are true, so you got me there.


    Of all the people that you mentioned Clinton is the only one currently running for president & her "history" of foreign policy is poor.

    Quote

    Originally posted by: forkushV
    Quote

    Originally posted by: hoops2
    "2016 Republican presidential nominee is perceived as being ignorant about policy issues, especially when compared with Hillary"

    Her track record in Egypt, Libya, Syria, isis, Russia, China and N Korea to name a few is terrible
    Well I would compare her tenure to the foreign policy that proceeded hers, but that would be ***BLAMING BUSH*** which I understand isn't allowed here. Is it kosher to use Reagan as a comparison? You know, the guy who sided with Saddam, sent missiles to Mullahs, and had Benghazi x 60 in Lebanon.

    No wonder you guys hate history.


    Quote

    Originally posted by: alanleroyII
    Quote

    Originally posted by: forkushV
    ...
  • I think Forkush will be acting like an idiot.
  • Forkush will probably be acting like an idiot.

    Anyone else see a contradiction? Me neither.

  • THINK WILL BE and CAN PROBABLY BE are very SIMILAR things...
    Fixed!

    Quote

    Originally posted by: hoops2
    Of all the people that you mentioned Clinton is the only one currently running for president & her "history" of foreign policy is poor.

    Quote

    Originally posted by: forkushV
    Quote

    Originally posted by: hoops2
    "2016 Republican presidential nominee is perceived as being ignorant about policy issues, especially when compared with Hillary"

    Her track record in Egypt, Libya, Syria, isis, Russia, China and N Korea to name a few is terrible
    Well I would compare her tenure to the foreign policy that proceeded hers, but that would be ***BLAMING BUSH*** which I understand isn't allowed here. Is it kosher to use Reagan as a comparison? You know, the guy who sided with Saddam, sent missiles to Mullahs, and had Benghazi x 60 in Lebanon.

    No wonder you guys hate history.




    Poor? How 'bout absolutely horrible?

    Quote

    Originally posted by: hoops2
    Of all the people that you mentioned Clinton is the only one currently running for president & her "history" of foreign policy is poor...
    But to test that, we're not allowed to compare her with previous administration's foreign policy. Is that your position?
    You said that Clinton had more foreign policy experience than any of the republican candidates. I pointed out that her foreign policy was a string of failures.

    As usual when you are on the losing side of a debate you change the subject to people who aren't running for president.
    That one had more experience gambling in Vegas than any one else in history. That same one never had a day with a winning balance, but because that one had the most experience, that's the one that should be consulted about gambling in Vegas casinos.
    Already a LVA subscriber?
    To continue reading, choose an option below:
    Diamond Membership
    $3 per month
    Unlimited access to LVA website
    Exclusive subscriber-only content
    Limited Member Rewards Online
    Join Now
    or
    Platinum Membership
    $50 per year
    Unlimited access to LVA website
    Exclusive subscriber-only content
    Exclusive Member Rewards Book
    Join Now