Quote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
LOL. The Russians hack the Democrat's computers and these two Democratic shills don't have the balls to tell us about it.
Yep, hacking happens, to the DNC, Sony, the CIA director, Sarah Palin, and George W. Bush among others. And keeping an entire network secure is really hard. But keeping a single critical document secure for just a few hours? That's trivial, but the best people working for Trump couldn't manage it.
Oh yeah leaking a speech a couple of hours before it's given just as bad being extremely careless in handling very sensitive, highly classified information...
Yeah, like discussions of Edward Snowden, retroactively labeled classified, and available to anyone with an internet connection. You know much of the information available from Wikileaks is still considered classified, and it was linked to in this thread. OMG, that means that LVA is helping to expose classified information on its private server. Not only that, it's on a private server. And did I mention that LVA has a PRIVATE SERVER?
Which reminds me. Does the LVA Members Rewards book have any 2-For-1's on nothingburgers?
(And the only reason this is being discussed is that the Benghazi investigation embarrassment flamed out so badly.)
Oh yeah...It's a nothingburger when 56% of Americans think Hillary should have been indicted and 57% said her behavior made them worried about how she would handle her responsibilities as president if elected. And you attack Trump because someone leaked his speech? That's why you're a political hack. But hey...The FBI Director's words are more powerful than mine....
1. "Extremely careless"
"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."
2. "Should have known"
"There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton's position, or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about those matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation."
3. "Still obligated to protect it"
"Only a very small number of the emails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked 'classified' in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it."
4. "Sophisticated adversaries"
"She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton's personal email account."
Hillary was careless with very sensitive, highly classified information. The majority of Americans think she should have been criminally charged. Is Forkush concerned about that? The #2 Hillary Apologist? Of course not. It's a nothingburger!. But OMG!...Someone leaked The Donald's speech! Maybe the FBI should investigate! Maybe the voters will think he should be indicted...like they think Hillary should have been...Talk about no sense of reality.