Trump’s Tax Returns

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Amberly
are you and Boiler really this dense?

I explained that the buzz I witnessed was not affiliated with media, but conversational between non-partisan types like myself.

So while liberals foolishly go aha!

And while conservative say, this is proof that there is nothing to Trump's returns. Fake News! Fake News! Fake News!

The rest of us say this makes no sense. That if someone wanted to harm Donald Trump they wouldn't release two pages from 11 years ago with no details. This is fairly obviously an attempt to manipulate.

I now return Fritz, DrMilled, Hoops and Boiler to their regularly scheduled right wing programming. If this had been an actual emergency. ...

Quote

---

Originally posted by: lvfritz
LOL, hey Amberly tell us all here, please! Where is one likely to find a non-partisan in this hyper partisan environment? The only non partisans likely to be found are not likely to found in this country! You really need to stop watching MSNBC and find a real news outlet for yourself.

---

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Amberly

Quote

---

Originally posted by: JM2300

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Amberly
There's is a lot of buzz today that affiliates of Trump, if not the White House staff directly, purposely "leaked" the 2005 two-page return because it was in Trump's best interest.

---

If purposely "leaked" or not why didn't the Daily Beast and Ms Maddow look at the returns before reporting it? What tools!
At least Geraldo had a wall between him and Capone's vault.

Who's going to volunteer to wipe the egg off Ms Maddow's face? Don't look at me.

---

I agree. Trump affiliates played her to a tee.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: JM2300

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Amberly

Quote

---

Originally posted by: JM2300

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Amberly
There's is a lot of buzz today that affiliates of Trump, if not the White House staff directly, purposely "leaked" the 2005 two-page return because it was in Trump's best interest.

---

If purposely "leaked" or not why didn't the Daily Beast and Ms Maddow look at the returns before reporting it? What tools!
At least Geraldo had a wall between him and Capone's vault.

Who's going to volunteer to wipe the egg off Ms Maddow's face? Don't look at me.

---

I agree. Trump affiliates played her to a tee.

---

And your sources for a "lot of buzz"? Ms Maddow = H & R Blockhead.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Rachel Maddow: Don’t Blame Me if Trump Tax-Return Story Was a Dud :

******quote******
Because I have information about the president doesn't mean that it's necessarily a scandal. It doesn't mean that it's damning information. If other people leapt to that conclusion without me indicating that it was, that hype is external to what we did.
***endquote******

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Amberly

Quote

---

Originally posted by: JM2300

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Amberly

Quote

---

Originally posted by: JM2300

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Amberly
There's is a lot of buzz today that affiliates of Trump, if not the White House staff directly, purposely "leaked" the 2005 two-page return because it was in Trump's best interest.

---

If purposely "leaked" or not why didn't the Daily Beast and Ms Maddow look at the returns before reporting it? What tools!
At least Geraldo had a wall between him and Capone's vault.

Who's going to volunteer to wipe the egg off Ms Maddow's face? Don't look at me.

---

I agree. Trump affiliates played her to a tee.

---

And your sources for a "lot of buzz"? Ms Maddow = H & R Blockhead.

---

Like I said twice previously media is not the source. I've been on the road and haven't seen MSNBC. The buzz or discussion has been socially. The talk is that 1. Maddow was played for a fool; 2. It's pretty obvious that whoever "leaked" two pages of an 11-year-old return did so in Trump's best interest not because it would damage him. Just the opposite.

---