Vegas Free-for-All - Twelve More Women Come Forward And Claim Trump Assaulted Them

Twelve More Women Come Forward And Claim Trump Assaulted Them

alanleroyII

Oct 17, 2016
7:57am

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2

Quote
Originally posted by: lvfritz
I wonder if Liarry doesn't participate in this forum.....one hour as PJ, one hour as Forkie, one hour as Mali......that way SHE doesn't have to the conniving, she can have one of her alto ego's do it for her.

I just have this vision of dummies sitting on Liarry's lap......

Lvfritz, Alan, and Hoops remind me of the guys that hid in the bunker with Hitler during the last days of the Third Reich.

Is that something like yo mamma's basement?

jatki

Oct 17, 2016
9:21am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Now, If you want to claim I'm a hypocrite for whatever the hell you want to make up about me next....

But Now AlanLeroy has tee'd himself up to engage in a classic exercise of his own hypocrisy.
Man, am I good or what? PJ. So predictable.

I have never voted for a candidate who was against Major things I believe it...

...and so you took your ball and went home.

You know alanleroy, you could give a master class on how to be ineffectual and impotent when it comes to effecting political change. Let's compare you with the vast majority of Bernie supporters who got Clinton to alter her stance on the TPP treaty, the minimum wage, college tuition, and other issues, and then chose to support her in the general. If most Bernie voters were impervious to compromise like you are, Hillary would have had no incentive to change her positions. But because of both our hard work and our flexibility, we are going to end up with a candidate that is considerably more progressive than the one we started with.

So keep on voting for purely symbolic third-party candidates alanleroy, until you find one that is pure enough to meet your standards. We like it that way.

You actually BELIEVE the hill has changed her position on ANYTHING? Naive post of the year award goes to....

forkushV

Oct 17, 2016
9:33am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Now, If you want to claim I'm a hypocrite for whatever the hell you want to make up about me next....

But Now AlanLeroy has tee'd himself up to engage in a classic exercise of his own hypocrisy.
Man, am I good or what? PJ. So predictable.

I have never voted for a candidate who was against Major things I believe it...
...and so you took your ball and went home.

You know alanleroy, you could give a master class on how to be ineffectual and impotent when it comes to effecting political change. Let's compare you with the vast majority of Bernie supporters who got Clinton to alter her stance on the TPP treaty, the minimum wage, college tuition, and other issues, and then chose to support her in the general. If most Bernie voters were impervious to compromise like you are, Hillary would have had no incentive to change her positions. But because of both our hard work and our flexibility, we are going to end up with a candidate that is considerably more progressive than the one we started with.

So keep on voting for purely symbolic third-party candidates alanleroy, until you find one that is pure enough to meet your standards. We like it that way.

You actually BELIEVE the hill has changed her position on ANYTHING?...

Of course. As the Democratic Party has moved to the left, largely thanks to Bernie and his supporters, so has Hillary. You can call her evolved or smart or craven - I really don't care. I just like the result.

chefantwon

Oct 17, 2016
9:50am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Because "free trade" and "fair trade" are mutually exclusive. More centrist commentating straight from Sean Hannity's cue cards - and echoed on this board by our non-partisan referee, ALanLeroy.

It is possible to conceive of a system where countries all trade with each other without cheating or manipulating labor. I hardly see the nefarious nature of wishing for that end...but then again - I didn't see any death panels in the ACA either. So maybe I'm just blind.

Nope, too many folks looking out for their best interests = somebody thinks its unfair.

You may not as insurers are jumping ship as fast as rats.....

hoops2

Oct 17, 2016
10:35pm

Block User

"Of course. As the Democratic Party has moved to the left, largely thanks to Bernie and his supporters, so has Hillary. You can call her evolved or smart or craven - I really don't care. I just like the result."

forky is in favor of 1% GDP growth expanding deficit, collapsing obamacare, record high u6 rates and record low adult participation rates

billryan

Oct 18, 2016
2:06am

Block User

Are you so broken you are addicted to work?
People, especially men, are waking up to the fact that there is more to life than work.
More people should try it. Why wait until you are 65 to enjoy life's pleasures.

CowboyKell

Oct 18, 2016
2:47am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Are you so broken you are addicted to work?
People, especially men, are waking up to the fact that there is more to life than work.
More people should try it. Why wait until you are 65 to enjoy life's pleasures.

This is a very good sentiment and I actually believe in it. However, one must make hard decisions as to how they want to enjoy life. Are you happy living a frugal existence? If you answer yes then by all means do so and be happy. Would you rather have "nice things" and live luxuriously? Well, you are going to have to work for those things.

When I was very young, highschool age, I wanted to live a "Ken Ward from Zane Grey books" life. This can be done on a shoestring budget but I prefer to couple the adventure with luxury. So I worked very, very hard for 25 years living an adventure along the way. I have no regrets and would do it all again, I might even work harder given the opportunity.

billryan

Oct 18, 2016
4:22am

Block User

I live in a gated community with a health club, two pools and a club. Drive a 2016 Mazda.
Not a Spartan lifestyle but toned down from the past.
I couldn't do this in NYC but can in Vegas. In eighteen months I can tap my IRAs and assuming I don't live more than forty years, it will be okay. I'm torn between taking early SS and investing it or waiting. There are strong arguments both ways.

Roulette Man

Oct 18, 2016
5:30am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
I live in a gated community with a health club, two pools and a club. Drive a 2016 Mazda.
Not a Spartan lifestyle but toned down from the past.
I couldn't do this in NYC but can in Vegas. In eighteen months I can tap my IRAs and assuming I don't live more than forty years, it will be okay. I'm torn between taking early SS and investing it or waiting. There are strong arguments both ways.

Take it. You will never make up the difference of what you would have been paid, even though you would be paid more at a later age.

jphelan

Oct 18, 2016
6:32am

Block User

Don't drain more than 4% per year from your nestegg and you will never outlive your money. If 4% of your nest egg is not enough, take Social Security early.

«‹11 ›»

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now