Twelve More Women Come Forward And Claim Trump Assaulted Them

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

How does a man get in the womens dressing area of a beauty pagent?

Trump said on Howard stern something to the effect because he owned them, and he has a right to inspect the merchandise.
Quote

How can a man have his hands all over a women that was just given a seat in First Class, with out anyone noticing and not doing anything to stop it?

Most people try and mind their own business. Especially so back in the early 1970s. Even today if you were bumped up to first class and after being seated and you saw a famous litigious wealthy business man getting handsy with a female you did not know would you jump out of your seat and put a stop to it?
Quote

Has anyone noticed that so far the women are Clinton supporters and some have/are working for them?

That is not true at all I saw Temple Taggart on CNN today she is a Republican. The Former Ms. Arizona that was one of the first pageant women to be interviewed said she was a conservative. None of the women work for the Clinton Campaign. Some of the said they would vote for Clinton, but there is a good mix of Republican and non-political folks making the claims.
Quote

Has anyone noticed the lack of Clinton signs?

No, but I live in a Republican area. I have noticed many of the Trump signs have disappeared from people’s yards since the tape came out.

No, I haven’t noticed Sanders voters and Black voters being taken for granted. I will pass your concern along to them though.

Oh, and several women did come forward before the debate. I have not included them in my total. For example Temple Taggart came forward back in may.


Last I recall, 30 years ago equates somewhere near 1986...

Just to add, to date NONE, of those women have filed suit against Trump. If they go away after the election, I would be suing the DNC and Clinton for $10 Billion per woman...
Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

How does a man get in the womens dressing area of a beauty pagent?

Trump said on Howard stern something to the effect because he owned them, and he has a right to inspect the merchandise.
Quote

How can a man have his hands all over a women that was just given a seat in First Class, with out anyone noticing and not doing anything to stop it?

Most people try and mind their own business. Especially so back in the early 1970s. Even today if you were bumped up to first class and after being seated and you saw a famous litigious wealthy business man getting handsy with a female you did not know would you jump out of your seat and put a stop to it?
Quote

Has anyone noticed that so far the women are Clinton supporters and some have/are working for them?

That is not true at all I saw Temple Taggart on CNN today she is a Republican. The Former Ms. Arizona that was one of the first pageant women to be interviewed said she was a conservative. None of the women work for the Clinton Campaign. Some of the said they would vote for Clinton, but there is a good mix of Republican and non-political folks making the claims.
Quote

Has anyone noticed the lack of Clinton signs?

No, but I live in a Republican area. I have noticed many of the Trump signs have disappeared from people’s yards since the tape came out.

No, I haven’t noticed Sanders voters and Black voters being taken for granted. I will pass your concern along to them though.

Oh, and several women did come forward before the debate. I have not included them in my total. For example Temple Taggart came forward back in may.


Last I recall, 30 years ago equates somewhere near 1986...

Just to add, to date NONE, of those women have filed suit against Trump...
Not true. His ex-wife accused him of rape in their divorce proceedings. A girl that was 13 at the time has an active lawsuit accusing him of rape. And a former business associate sued for assault and attempted rape in a case that was settled.

Some of the others have strong credibility too. One accuser complained about him on Facebook in 2013, well before his presidential run. Two others have corroboration that was contemporaneous; one reporter told the story to her editor at the time, and another called a former journalism professor for advice at the time. Some beauty contest participants have accused him of doing EXACTLY what he bragged about doing with Howard Stern. And there is video of him telling a ten-year old that he would be dating her in ten years.

chef, it's over, this is who Donald Trump is.

But Hillary acted as a court appointed attorney for a guy who was guilty of rape, right? BOTH SIDES DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

How does a man get in the womens dressing area of a beauty pagent?

Trump said on Howard stern something to the effect because he owned them, and he has a right to inspect the merchandise.
Quote

How can a man have his hands all over a women that was just given a seat in First Class, with out anyone noticing and not doing anything to stop it?

Most people try and mind their own business. Especially so back in the early 1970s. Even today if you were bumped up to first class and after being seated and you saw a famous litigious wealthy business man getting handsy with a female you did not know would you jump out of your seat and put a stop to it?
Quote

Has anyone noticed that so far the women are Clinton supporters and some have/are working for them?

That is not true at all I saw Temple Taggart on CNN today she is a Republican. The Former Ms. Arizona that was one of the first pageant women to be interviewed said she was a conservative. None of the women work for the Clinton Campaign. Some of the said they would vote for Clinton, but there is a good mix of Republican and non-political folks making the claims.
Quote

Has anyone noticed the lack of Clinton signs?

No, but I live in a Republican area. I have noticed many of the Trump signs have disappeared from people’s yards since the tape came out.

No, I haven’t noticed Sanders voters and Black voters being taken for granted. I will pass your concern along to them though.

Oh, and several women did come forward before the debate. I have not included them in my total. For example Temple Taggart came forward back in may.


Last I recall, 30 years ago equates somewhere near 1986...

Just to add, to date NONE, of those women have filed suit against Trump...
Not true. His ex-wife accused him of rape in their divorce proceedings. A girl that was 13 at the time has an active lawsuit accusing him of rape. And a former business associate sued for assault and attempted rape in a case that was settled.

Some of the others have strong credibility too. One accuser complained about him on Facebook in 2013, well before his presidential run. Two others have corroboration that was contemporaneous; one reporter told the story to her editor at the time, and another called a former journalism professor for advice at the time. Some beauty contest participants have accused him of doing EXACTLY what he bragged about doing with Howard Stern. And there is video of him telling a ten-year old that he would be dating her in ten years.

chef, it's over, this is who Donald Trump is.

But Hillary acted as a court appointed attorney for a guy who was guilty of rape, right? BOTH SIDES DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Forkie, Ivana dropped the claim after she got the money. The second one was raised more than 20 years after the alleged rape and may be thrown out of New York court as the Statue of Limitations have expired.

Forkie actually believes Trump would wait 10 years to find someone he met before just to date her? Forkie you smoking that funny smelling weed again?


Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Now, If you want to claim I'm a hypocrite for whatever the hell you want to make up about me next....

But Now AlanLeroy has tee'd himself up to engage in a classic exercise of his own hypocrisy.
Man, am I good or what? PJ. So predictable.

I have never voted for a candidate who was against Major things I believe it...
...and so you took your ball and went home.

You know alanleroy, you could give a master class on how to be ineffectual and impotent when it comes to effecting political change. Let's compare you with the vast majority of Bernie supporters who got Clinton to alter her stance on the TPP treaty, the minimum wage, college tuition, and other issues, and then chose to support her in the general. If most Bernie voters were impervious to compromise like you are, Hillary would have had no incentive to change her positions. But because of both our hard work and our flexibility, we are going to end up with a candidate that is considerably more progressive than the one we started with.

So keep on voting for purely symbolic third-party candidates alanleroy, until you find one that is pure enough to meet your standards. We like it that way.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Now, If you want to claim I'm a hypocrite for whatever the hell you want to make up about me next....

But Now AlanLeroy has tee'd himself up to engage in a classic exercise of his own hypocrisy.
Man, am I good or what? PJ. So predictable.

I have never voted for a candidate who was against Major things I believe it...
...and so you took your ball and went home.

You know alanleroy, you could give a master class on how to be ineffectual and impotent when it comes to effecting political change. Let's compare you with the vast majority of Bernie supporters who got Clinton to alter her stance on the TPP treaty, the minimum wage, college tuition, and other issues, and then chose to support her in the general. If most Bernie voters were impervious to compromise like you are, Hillary would have had no incentive to change her positions. But because of both our hard work and our flexibility, we are going to end up with a candidate that is considerably more progressive than the one we started with.

So keep on voting for purely symbolic third-party candidates alanleroy, until you find one that is pure enough to meet your standards. We like it that way.
Change her Positions Change her 'Public' position for the gullible is more like it. It's doubtful her 'Private' position changed at all. You know...the Real Positions she espouses when speaking to her Wall Street Banker donor/overlords.

You may like your turd sandwich better than the giant douche. But it's doubtful she's any different than the corrupt candidate you started with. I find it entertaining that you actually believe she is. You don't really believe that, do you?

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Now, If you want to claim I'm a hypocrite for whatever the hell you want to make up about me next....

But Now AlanLeroy has tee'd himself up to engage in a classic exercise of his own hypocrisy.
Man, am I good or what? PJ. So predictable.

I have never voted for a candidate who was against Major things I believe it...
...and so you took your ball and went home.

You know alanleroy, you could give a master class on how to be ineffectual and impotent when it comes to effecting political change. Let's compare you with the vast majority of Bernie supporters who got Clinton to alter her stance on the TPP treaty, the minimum wage, college tuition, and other issues, and then chose to support her in the general. If most Bernie voters were impervious to compromise like you are, Hillary would have had no incentive to change her positions. But because of both our hard work and our flexibility, we are going to end up with a candidate that is considerably more progressive than the one we started with.

So keep on voting for purely symbolic third-party candidates alanleroy, until you find one that is pure enough to meet your standards. We like it that way.
Change her Positions Change her 'Public' position for the gullible is more like it...
Here is the full quote - directly from Wikileaks - that right-winger never seem to want to quote in full. It's pretty much Schoolhouse Rock 102, and any politician in a negotiation that shows all their card is an idiot. Lincoln was no dummy.

"You just have to sort of figure out how to -- getting back to that word, "balance" -- how to balance the public and the private efforts that are necessary to be successful, politically, and that's not just a comment about today. That, I think, has probably been true for all of our history, and if you saw the Spielberg movie, Lincoln, and how he was maneuvering and working to get the 13th Amendment passed, and he called one of my favorite predecessors, Secretary Seward, who had been the governor and senator from New York, ran against Lincoln for president, and he told Seward, I need your help to get this done. And Seward called some of his lobbyist friends who knew how to make a deal, and they just kept going at it.

I mean, politics is like sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be. But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position. And finally, I think -- I believe in evidence-based decision making. I want to know what the facts are. I mean, it's like when you guys go into some kind of a deal, you know, are you going to do that development or not, are you going to do that renovation or not, you know, you look at the numbers. You try to figure out what's going to work and what's not going to work."
- Secretary Hillary Clinton
Comparing the money grabbing clintons to Lincoln is an insult to Lincoln.

There is no comparison to giving paid speeches to political supporters & then saying something different in public just to get votes & the 13th amendment.

The clintons have a history of saying different things to different groups, which statement should we believe? Lying hillary?

In other news, we now have emails where the clinton gang has insulted Christians & were sad that the San Bernadino shooters were muslims & not white people.

The podesta emails show that clinton gang attitude that they believe they are better than everybody else
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Comparing the money grabbing clintons to Lincoln is an insult to Lincoln...
Could we please get back to what Secretary Clinton SAID because that is what the right has tried to make an issue. To pretend the "private position" criticism is about whether she was paid for a speech is dishonest and cowardly. But I guess that's your nature.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Now, If you want to claim I'm a hypocrite for whatever the hell you want to make up about me next....

But Now AlanLeroy has tee'd himself up to engage in a classic exercise of his own hypocrisy.
Man, am I good or what? PJ. So predictable.

I have never voted for a candidate who was against Major things I believe it...
...and so you took your ball and went home.

You know alanleroy, you could give a master class on how to be ineffectual and impotent when it comes to effecting political change. Let's compare you with the vast majority of Bernie supporters who got Clinton to alter her stance on the TPP treaty, the minimum wage, college tuition, and other issues, and then chose to support her in the general. If most Bernie voters were impervious to compromise like you are, Hillary would have had no incentive to change her positions. But because of both our hard work and our flexibility, we are going to end up with a candidate that is considerably more progressive than the one we started with.

So keep on voting for purely symbolic third-party candidates alanleroy, until you find one that is pure enough to meet your standards. We like it that way.
Change her Positions Change her 'Public' position for the gullible is more like it...
Here is the full quote - directly from Wikileaks - that right-winger never seem to want to quote in full. It's pretty much Schoolhouse Rock 102, and any politician in a negotiation that shows all their card is an idiot. Lincoln was no dummy.

"My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders." That's what she says in private to foreign banker donors. I just don't recall her expressing those kinds of dreams on the campaign trail in public to her supporters. I guess it's all part of the negotiation. What are we negotiating again?

To summarize forky - political corruption is ok as long the democrats & in particulat the clintons benefit
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now