Vegas Free-for-All - Two Interesting Headlines related to Global Warming

Two Interesting Headlines related to Global Warming

chefantwon

Apr 1, 2015
9:30am

Forkie has yet to explain WHY the co2 levels were 10 times higher when the dinosaurs were around than they are today? Forkie has yet to explain WHY the Earth was frozen over and what caused the Earth to thaw? Forkie likes to show graphs of these scientists who believe the church of global warming, how many of them are getting federal grants?

Btw, why was the "hockey stick" graph and the data was not reviewed by ANYONE other than the folks that were a part of the original study??

Can Forkie explain WHY concrete holds heat longer than dirt and WHY temp data is measured at airports as the official measuring site?

Can Forkie explain WHY the Democratic Party loves communism when every time it has been tried, it has failed?

forkushV

Apr 1, 2015
10:11am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
Forkie has yet to explain WHY the co2 levels were 10 times higher when the dinosaurs were around than they are today? Forkie has yet to explain WHY the Earth was frozen over and what caused the Earth to thaw? Forkie likes to show graphs of these scientists who believe the church of global warming, how many of them are getting federal grants?

Btw, why was the "hockey stick" graph and the data was not reviewed by ANYONE other than the folks that were a part of the original study??

Can Forkie explain WHY concrete holds heat longer than dirt and WHY temp data is measured at airports as the official measuring site?

I haven't a clue. I'm not trained to evaluate such things and neither are you. Maybe you should rely on overwhelming scientific consensus, as compiled by an MIT PhD/university president/national science board member. On the other hand, maybe you should rely on the compilation put together by the blogger/Breitbart fan with no no last name.

Your choice!

Poptech

Apr 1, 2015
6:00pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
My chart was put together by an MIT trained PhD who was the president of a couple of universities and a couple of science museums. And was appointed to a national science board by a couple of Presidents of the United States.

Appeals to an irrelevant authority is not an argument. James Powell is has a PhD in Geochemistry not Computer Science and it shows, as he knows absolutely nothing about the relevance of the databases queries he made. I have corrected numerous scientists on their computer illiteracy over the years.

Which irrefutable fact would you like to dispute from my article?

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Your chart is from a blogger with no last name who claims that marijuana is deadly and is a Breitbart fan.

Poptech, rather than belaboring this issue, why don't we just let everyone make up their own mind as to who is more credible.

You have no name at all and why are you cherry picking my list of papers showing the dangers of marijuana? If you wish to dispute the scientific findings of their paper I suggest getting your criticism published in the journal Forensic Science International.

Please quote where I claim to be a Breitbart fan.

"Credibility" is irrelevant to this argument but since we are talking relevant credentials (which would be in Computer Science/Information Technology) mine obliterate his on this issue.

Again, which irrefutable fact would you like to dispute from my article?

Please do entertain me as I would love to give you a proper education on this issue.

forkushV

Apr 2, 2015
2:20am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Poptech

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
My chart was put together by an MIT trained PhD who was the president of a couple of universities and a couple of science museums. And was appointed to a national science board by a couple of Presidents of the United States.

Irrefutable fact! How defiant! How bold. Look dude, maybe you should try breathing into a paper bag before composing your next post. (Or better yet, please spare us.)

But you know what I said about my not having a clue as to how to evaluate academic climate research? That goes ditto for evaluating computer database queries. So it still comes down to "Who do you trust?" Me, I trust the MIT PhD/university president/national science board guy over the blogger with no last name. Let's just leave it at that.

chefantwon

Apr 2, 2015
9:31am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: chefantwon
Forkie has yet to explain WHY the co2 levels were 10 times higher when the dinosaurs were around than they are today? Forkie has yet to explain WHY the Earth was frozen over and what caused the Earth to thaw? Forkie likes to show graphs of these scientists who believe the church of global warming, how many of them are getting federal grants?

Btw, why was the "hockey stick" graph and the data was not reviewed by ANYONE other than the folks that were a part of the original study??

Can Forkie explain WHY concrete holds heat longer than dirt and WHY temp data is measured at airports as the official measuring site?

How about a mathematician?

Steve McIntyre

link

Boilerman

Apr 2, 2015
11:41am

Block User

I watch Liberals like Forkie and other Liberals lie freely. I see Liberals like Forkie and Harry Reid justify such lies. Why would a believe a bunch of Liberals being supported by Liberals? The fix is in and the facts refute the Liberal argument.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: chefantwon
Forkie has yet to explain WHY the co2 levels were 10 times higher when the dinosaurs were around than they are today? Forkie has yet to explain WHY the Earth was frozen over and what caused the Earth to thaw? Forkie likes to show graphs of these scientists who believe the church of global warming, how many of them are getting federal grants?

Btw, why was the "hockey stick" graph and the data was not reviewed by ANYONE other than the folks that were a part of the original study??

Can Forkie explain WHY concrete holds heat longer than dirt and WHY temp data is measured at airports as the official measuring site?

Boilerman

Apr 2, 2015
11:44am

Block User

Forkie again states "look dude". Forkie, I again ask if you're stoned 15 hours a day or are you 14 years old?

It's one or the other.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: Poptech
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
My chart was put together by an MIT trained PhD who was the president of a couple of universities and a couple of science museums. And was appointed to a national science board by a couple of Presidents of the United States.

Appeals to an irrelevant authority is not an argument. James Powell is has a PhD in Geochemistry not Computer Science and it shows, as he knows absolutely nothing about the relevance of the databases queries he made. I have corrected numerous scientists on their computer illiteracy over the years.

Which irrefutable fact would you like to dispute from my article?...

forkushV

Apr 2, 2015
2:31pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: chefantwon
Forkie has yet to explain WHY the co2 levels were 10 times higher when the dinosaurs were around than they are today? Forkie has yet to explain WHY the Earth was frozen over and what caused the Earth to thaw? Forkie likes to show graphs of these scientists who believe the church of global warming, how many of them are getting federal grants?

Btw, why was the "hockey stick" graph and the data was not reviewed by ANYONE other than the folks that were a part of the original study??

Can Forkie explain WHY concrete holds heat longer than dirt and WHY temp data is measured at airports as the official measuring site?
I haven't a clue. I'm not trained to evaluate such things and neither are you. Maybe you should rely on overwhelming scientific consensus, as compiled by an MIT PhD/university president/national science board member. On the other hand, maybe you should rely on the compilation put together by the blogger/Breitbart fan with no no last name.

Your choice!

How about a mathematician?

Steve McIntyre

link

Oh you mean the retired mining consultant? Well, he is several orders of magnitude more credible than the blogger with no last name, I'll give you that.

So chef, I have some questions about the mining consultant's post: What is a distinct end-member d15N_N03 signature, and what makes it distinct. And what is an alkenone proxie?

Admit it chef, you don't have a clue - yet you linked to that post just because someone told you it matched your political beliefs. You know what? I don't have a clue either, but I have the intelligence and the humility and the integrity and the self-awareness to avoid your fakery. I never cherry-pick scientific papers that I don't understand. Which is why I rely on overwhelming scientific consensus, and sometimes on a simple chart from a highly respected MIT trained scientist. And NOT on an ideologue blogger with no last name.

Poptech

Apr 2, 2015
7:29pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Irrefutable fact! How defiant! How bold. Look dude, maybe you should try breathing into a paper bag before composing your next post. (Or better yet, please spare us.)

But you know what I said about my not having a clue as to how to evaluate academic climate research? That goes ditto for evaluating computer database queries. So it still comes down to "Who do you trust?" Me, I trust the MIT PhD/university president/national science board guy over the blogger with no last name. Let's just leave it at that.

I repeat,

Which irrefutable fact would you like to dispute from my article?

This has nothing to do with "trust" but rather computer literacy 101 and the relevance of computer database queries.

Your appeal to authority from someone with no real name at all is not a valid argument. Lets start with one simple question.

Does the Web of Science database have a peer-reviewed filter?

Don

Apr 3, 2015
1:01am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
And what is an alkenone proxie?

Voyagers discover the first alkenone proxy on Earth.

«‹11 ›»

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now