Two Interesting Headlines related to Global Warming

Quote

---

Originally posted by: chefantwon

Quote

---

Originally posted by: andrew5499
Global Warming is man made, then solution is less men...

---

Wow, let's unpack the astonishing, incredible, absolutely jatkian level of stupidity in that statement.

Remember ozone depletion? Intelligent public policy and new CFC technology arrested that problem, didn't it? Ever hear of the "London Fog." Turns out it was air pollution sickening and killing thousands of Londoners every year. Intelligent public policy and technology made a dramatic difference there too, didn't it?

But here's my favorite. In the early 1900s, over 120,000 horses in New York City caused horseshit of immense proportions that caused a horrible stench and flies everywhere. And when horses commonly broke their legs on the slippery streets, they were destroyed, and the removal of the body could clog streets for hours. And the pleasant clip-clop of horses on cobblestone? On busy New York streets, normal conversation was impossible.

And what was the great environmental savior of NYC back then. The gasoline burning automobile, with of course, no smog device. And over time, we've needed to make other changes. So you see, very stupid person, we don't need "fewer men" to solve man-made problems. We simply need resourceful, intelligent, committed, optimistic, educated problem solvers. Meaning people not like you.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: alanleroy

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: chefantwon

Quote

---

Originally posted by: andrew5499
Global Warming is man made, then solution is less men...

---

Wow, let's unpack the astonishing, incredible, absolutely jatkian level of stupidity in that statement.

Remember ozone depletion? Intelligent public policy and new CFC technology arrested that problem, didn't it? Ever hear of the "London Fog." Turns out it was air pollution sickening and killing thousands of Londoners every year. Intelligent public policy and technology made a dramatic difference there too, didn't it?

But here's my favorite. In the early 1900s, over 120,000 horses in New York City caused horseshit of immense proportions that caused a horrible stench and flies everywhere. And when horses commonly broke their legs on the slippery streets, they were destroyed, and the removal of the body could clog streets for hours. And the pleasant clip-clop of horses on cobblestone? On busy New York streets, normal conversation was impossible.

And what was the great environmental savior of NYC back then. The gasoline burning automobile, with of course, no smog device. And over time, we've needed to make other changes. So you see, very stupid person, we don't need "fewer men" to solve man-made problems. We simply need resourceful, intelligent, committed, optimistic, educated problem solvers. Meaning people not like you.

---

Because there can never be too many people.

---

Strawman much?

Of course lots of people would like to see the distribution of very cheap or free birth control, especially women. Of course one of the biggest thought leaders of the Republican Party would refer to them as "sluts."

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: alanleroy

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: chefantwon

Quote

---

Originally posted by: andrew5499
Global Warming is man made, then solution is less men...

---

Wow, let's unpack the astonishing, incredible, absolutely jatkian level of stupidity in that statement.

Remember ozone depletion? Intelligent public policy and new CFC technology arrested that problem, didn't it? Ever hear of the "London Fog." Turns out it was air pollution sickening and killing thousands of Londoners every year. Intelligent public policy and technology made a dramatic difference there too, didn't it?

But here's my favorite. In the early 1900s, over 120,000 horses in New York City caused horseshit of immense proportions that caused a horrible stench and flies everywhere. And when horses commonly broke their legs on the slippery streets, they were destroyed, and the removal of the body could clog streets for hours. And the pleasant clip-clop of horses on cobblestone? On busy New York streets, normal conversation was impossible.

And what was the great environmental savior of NYC back then. The gasoline burning automobile, with of course, no smog device. And over time, we've needed to make other changes. So you see, very stupid person, we don't need "fewer men" to solve man-made problems. We simply need resourceful, intelligent, committed, optimistic, educated problem solvers. Meaning people not like you.

---

Because there can never be too many people.

---

Strawman much?

Of course lots of people would like to see the distribution of very cheap or free birth control, especially women. Of course one of the biggest thought leaders of the Republican Party would refer to them as "sluts."

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: alanleroy

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: chefantwon

Quote

---

Originally posted by: andrew5499
Global Warming is man made, then solution is less men...

---

Wow, let's unpack the astonishing, incredible, absolutely jatkian level of stupidity in that statement.

Remember ozone depletion? Intelligent public policy and new CFC technology arrested that problem, didn't it? Ever hear of the "London Fog." Turns out it was air pollution sickening and killing thousands of Londoners every year. Intelligent public policy and technology made a dramatic difference there too, didn't it?

But here's my favorite. In the early 1900s, over 120,000 horses in New York City caused horseshit of immense proportions that caused a horrible stench and flies everywhere. And when horses commonly broke their legs on the slippery streets, they were destroyed, and the removal of the body could clog streets for hours. And the pleasant clip-clop of horses on cobblestone? On busy New York streets, normal conversation was impossible.

And what was the great environmental savior of NYC back then. The gasoline burning automobile, with of course, no smog device. And over time, we've needed to make other changes. So you see, very stupid person, we don't need "fewer men" to solve man-made problems. We simply need resourceful, intelligent, committed, optimistic, educated problem solvers. Meaning people not like you.

---

Because there can never be too many people.

---

Strawman much?

Of course lots of people would like to see the distribution of very cheap or free birth control, especially women. Of course one of the biggest thought leaders of the Republican Party would refer to them as "sluts."

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: alanleroy

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: chefantwon

Quote

---

Originally posted by: andrew5499
Global Warming is man made, then solution is less men...

---

Wow, let's unpack the astonishing, incredible, absolutely jatkian level of stupidity in that statement.

Remember ozone depletion? Intelligent public policy and new CFC technology arrested that problem, didn't it? Ever hear of the "London Fog." Turns out it was air pollution sickening and killing thousands of Londoners every year. Intelligent public policy and technology made a dramatic difference there too, didn't it?

But here's my favorite. In the early 1900s, over 120,000 horses in New York City caused horseshit of immense proportions that caused a horrible stench and flies everywhere. And when horses commonly broke their legs on the slippery streets, they were destroyed, and the removal of the body could clog streets for hours. And the pleasant clip-clop of horses on cobblestone? On busy New York streets, normal conversation was impossible.

And what was the great environmental savior of NYC back then. The gasoline burning automobile, with of course, no smog device. And over time, we've needed to make other changes. So you see, very stupid person, we don't need "fewer men" to solve man-made problems. We simply need resourceful, intelligent, committed, optimistic, educated problem solvers. Meaning people not like you.

---

Because there can never be too many people.

---

Strawman much?

Of course lots of people would like to see the distribution of very cheap or free birth control, especially women. Of course one of the biggest thought leaders of the Republican Party would refer to them as "sluts."

---

Free birth control, isn't that just another name for abortion??

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: chefantwon

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: alanleroy

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: chefantwon

Quote

---

Originally posted by: andrew5499
Global Warming is man made, then solution is less men...

---

Wow, let's unpack the astonishing, incredible, absolutely jatkian level of stupidity in that statement.

Remember ozone depletion? Intelligent public policy and new CFC technology arrested that problem, didn't it? Ever hear of the "London Fog." Turns out it was air pollution sickening and killing thousands of Londoners every year. Intelligent public policy and technology made a dramatic difference there too, didn't it?

But here's my favorite. In the early 1900s, over 120,000 horses in New York City caused horseshit of immense proportions that caused a horrible stench and flies everywhere. And when horses commonly broke their legs on the slippery streets, they were destroyed, and the removal of the body could clog streets for hours. And the pleasant clip-clop of horses on cobblestone? On busy New York streets, normal conversation was impossible.

And what was the great environmental savior of NYC back then. The gasoline burning automobile, with of course, no smog device. And over time, we've needed to make other changes. So you see, very stupid person, we don't need "fewer men" to solve man-made problems. We simply need resourceful, intelligent, committed, optimistic, educated problem solvers. Meaning people not like you.

---

Because there can never be too many people.

---

Strawman much?

Of course lots of people would like to see the distribution of very cheap or free birth control, especially women. Of course one of the biggest thought leaders of the Republican Party would refer to them as "sluts."

---

Free birth control, isn't that just another name for abortion??

---

Actually, it's just another name for abortion NOT! But one of the most popular thought leaders in our radical extremist political party would call women who advocate for that "sluts." You must be so proud.

---