Quote
Originally posted by: PoptechThis is a complete misrepresentation of his position and he has refuted all criticisms of his work. Please quote his actual position, from one of his own works and not from a far-left news media outlet, as I am sure your intent was not to misrepresent his position. Feel free to read his actual position on the issue here,
OK
He explains his position an interview with the NY Times in 2012. I'll let the Time's credibility stand on its own feet. Copnsidering your blog presents a partisan view of the issue I wont engage you in an argument over which site has more credibility.
ny times
"Richard S. Lindzen, a professor of meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is the leading proponent of the view that clouds will save the day. His stature in the field — he has been making seminal contributions to climate science since the 1960s — has amplified his influence.
Dr. Lindzen says the earth is not especially sensitive to greenhouse gases because clouds will react to counter them, and he believes he has identified a specific mechanism. On a warming planet, he says, less coverage by high clouds in the tropics will allow more heat to escape to space, countering the temperature increase.
His idea has drawn withering criticism from other scientists, who cite errors in his papers and say proof is lacking. Enough evidence is already in hand, they say, to rule out the powerful cooling effect from clouds that would be needed to offset the increase of greenhouse gases."
Quote
Originally posted by: Poptech
Also "NASA" as an entire organization does not have a singular position on climate change since all of their over 17,000 employees were never polled, rather various scientists that work for them do. So please do not misrepresent NASA either.
