Update on Military Bases and the hiring Freeze

Federal hiring freeze may mean reduced hours, even closures, for some military exchanges
By: Karen Jowers, February 24, 2017 (Photo Credit: Photo courtesy of AAFES)
At least one military exchange service is facing the possibility of reducing operating hours and closing stores as a result of the federal civilian hiring freeze, a spokesman said.

The Army and Air Force Exchange Service has asked the Army for an exemption to the hiring freeze, AAFES spokesman Judd Anstey said. In the meantime, AAFES has dealt with the order's effects by increasing hours of part-time employees and delaying planned openings of new stores.

But, he said, “an exemption is needed soon to avoid reducing operating hours and/or closing stores.”

Officials who operate Navy exchanges and Marine exchanges have also asked for exemptions, and are assessing and monitoring the impact of the hiring freeze.

As the month-old federal civilian hiring freeze settles in, reality is also settling in that the freeze applies to nearly every military family and quality-of-life program on installations, including Defense Department schools, commissaries, military exchanges and morale, welfare and recreation programs.
 
Information was not available at press time from either the Department Defense Education Activity or the Defense Commissary Agency about whether the hiring freeze has affected operations at schools and commissaries. Whether they are teachers or staff members in DoDEA schools, or cashiers in commissaries, these employees are federal government workers and their salaries and benefits are paid for by taxpayers. They are not exempted from the hiring freeze.
But a number of officials within the Defense Department are questioning why military exchanges and other entities operated with nonappropriated funds are included under the freeze, sources said.
  
By law, employees of NAF organizations -- such as the military exchanges and MWR activities -- are not employees of federal agencies or employees of the U.S. government. Their salaries are paid for by the profits of those operations.They were not included in the government furloughs of 2013.
 
“It makes no sense to include them,” said one DoD official. “They’re self-supporting, and their salaries are not paid by the government.”

The official asked not to be named because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the topic.
 
NAF employees are included in the civilian hiring freeze because of the wording of President Trump’s memo, DoD spokesman Johnny Michael explained. The order states that the freeze "applies to all executive departments and agencies regardless of the sources of their operational and
programmatic funding, excepting military personnel."
  
Officials in the Marine Corps Business and Support Services Division have also asked for an exemption for all Marine Corps Exchange retail employees from the hiring freeze “since there is no appropriated fund taxpayer expenditures in funding of their salary and benefits,” said Bryan Driver, spokesman for the division.



Those officials have also asked to be able to hire seasonal employees at the exchanges, pools and Inns of the Corps, he said. A DoD memo authorizing exemptions to the hiring freeze for some employment areas allows these actions regarding seasonal employees and short-term temporary help needed to meet recurring seasonal workloads, but advance coordination is required.
 
“We know of no specific [Marine Corps Exchange] program reductions due to the hiring freeze,” Driver said.

Navy Exchange officials also have asked for an exemption to the hiring freeze, according to Navy Exchange Service Command spokeswoman Kristine Sturkie.

"We are currently looking at our open billets and staffing levels to assess potential operational impacts and how we can mitigate them," Sturkie said. adding that NEXCOM recently received approval to hire seasonal workers for its garden centers, Navy Lodges and other short-term requirements, she said. 

There are exemptions to the hiring freeze outlined in the memo that apply to some programs and services for military families, included because Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has deemed them "necessary to meet national security or public safety responsibilities," according to the guidance:

Those who provide child care to children of military personnel.
Those at the installation level providing direct support to the prevention of child abuse, sexual assault, domestic violence, and suicide, and providing support to those who are affected.
Those who perform mortuary affairs activities and other directly related services to properly care for the fallen and their families.
Those who provide inpatient care at military treatment facilities, and provide acute and emergency outpatient care in military medical and dental facilities. Also, jobs involving communicable disease prevention and similar public health activities.
However, these aren't blanket exemptions -- they require approval, and officials granted authority to approve the exemptions must be ready to "justify their ... decisions on a position-by-position basis," per the memo.


This health care exemption is also vague, said Joyce Raezer, executive director of the National Military Family Association, noting that the DoD guidance also first states that the exemptions apply “to the extent necessary to maintain capability to ensure a medically ready force.”

She said advocates have been watching military health care, and other areas, to determine if there are effects on families. 

“AAFES having to cut hours or close stores would be a direct result of the hiring freeze,” she said. “But this will be an issue – separating out the hiring freeze from the problems that existed before.”

She cautioned against blaming every cut in access on the hiring freeze. For example, families recently have said there are problems for DoDEA in hiring substitute teachers, but family advocates have heard complaints before about such problems and have been trying to track down the root cause.
 
According to the DoD guidance, any job candidate who received a job offer or appointment before Jan. 22 and who received documentation from the agency that specified a start date on or before Feb. 22, was able to take that position. 

The timeline for the hiring freeze is uncertain.
 
President Trump’s memo ordering a hiring freeze of federal civilians, signed Jan. 23, also directed the Office of Management and Budget and the Officer of Personnel Management to come up with a long-term plan within 90 days to reduce the size of the federal government’s work force through attrition.

When that plan is implemented, the hiring freeze will end, according to the president’s order.

The unnamed DoD official said no DoD civilians should have been included in the hiring freeze.

“They all contribute to the Defense Department’s ability to do the job,” he said.  

Karen Jowers covers military families
Here's the most important portion of DD's attached quote.

"However, the service branches still must seek approval to hire workers to fill those positions when they become vacant". The word "still" is the critical word. The word "still" tells us that it is as it was. This tells us that nothing has changed.




Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Right. These bases had fully functional child care clinics before the hiring freeze. Now they don't. But it's not because of the hiring freeze. Got it.
Do you even believe your own blather?


Really? That's what you got out of that? Nuff said.
Yes, that what I have. Since the jist of your argument is that Trump has changed things, and I show that Trump has not changed things. Yep, that's good stuff.

Actually, it was DD that proved Trump has not changed things at these child care facilities. Yep, that's good stuff from DD.


Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Really? That's what you got out of that? Nuff said.



Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Really? That's what you got out of that? Nuff said.


HOLD IT! I'm Nuff, and I didn't say squat!
Quote

Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
Yes, that what I have. Since the jist of your argument is that Trump has changed things, and I show that Trump has not changed things. Yep, that's good stuff.

Actually, it was DD that proved Trump has not changed things at these child care facilities. Yep, that's good stuff from DD.


Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Really? That's what you got out of that? Nuff said.




To recap.
Before Trumps hiring freeze, the clinics were open. After Trumps hiring freeze, the clinics close because of staffing shortages because they cant hire new workers. but our Village Idiot has somehow proven one has nothing to do with the other.
That about cover it?

It proves one thing. That a Liberal with an agenda decided to close the child care facility. So typical.


Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Quote

Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
Yes, that what I have. Since the jist of your argument is that Trump has changed things, and I show that Trump has not changed things. Yep, that's good stuff.

Actually, it was DD that proved Trump has not changed things at these child care facilities. Yep, that's good stuff from DD.


Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Really? That's what you got out of that? Nuff said.




To recap.
Before Trumps hiring freeze, the clinics were open. After Trumps hiring freeze, the clinics close because of staffing shortages because they cant hire new workers. but our Village Idiot has somehow proven one has nothing to do with the other.
That about cover it?


Quote

Originally posted by: billryan To recap.
Before Trumps hiring freeze, the clinics were open. After Trumps hiring freeze, the clinics close because of staffing shortages because they cant hire new workers. but our Village Idiot has somehow proven one has nothing to do with the other.
That about cover it?


From one of your own posts: "a Feb. 1 Defense Department memo exempts from the freeze 16 categories of civilian workers, including "positions providing child care to the children of military personnel"

IOW, you say they can't hire new employees but the DoD said they can. Looks like there have been a bunch of communication problems that show the two clinics did not need to be closed but were closed anyway, with the blame being placed strictly on Trump's hiring freeze. And, you've been harping on the people staffing those clinics being dependent spouses of active military stationed at those bases, causing a constant turnover of employees. The DoD memo refers to civilian employees. What would prevent them from hiring civilians who live in the area that aren't military dependents subject to transfers?

Good golly, by reading all the stuff Billy c&p'ed off Google, seems like military bases will be closing their gates any day now.

It's so blatantly obvious the op was just some hearsay and when called for a source on it just started googling, didn't even bother to pick out the pertinent pieces.

"[There are] none so blind as those that will not see."
__Matthew Henry (1662-1714)
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now