Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
My brother bought a Philadelphia area townhouse some 2.5 years ago. The previous owner moved out of state and is still living out of state. A Democrat "get out to vote" lady stopped by my brother's place a few days back looking for the previous owner.................apparently he was a registered Democrat.
This a great system the Democrats are running (sarcasm) if they believe that Mr. Lopez should be voting in Pennsylvania after living out of state for 32 months. The Democrats go out of their way not to catch cheaters.
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
My brother bought a Philadelphia area townhouse some 2.5 years ago. The previous owner moved out of state and is still living out of state. A Democrat "get out to vote" lady stopped by my brother's place a few days back looking for the previous owner.................apparently he was a registered Democrat.
This a great system the Democrats are running (sarcasm) if they believe that Mr. Lopez should be voting in Pennsylvania after living out of state for 32 months. The Democrats go out of their way not to catch cheaters.
Quote
Originally posted by: OddsWrkin
Anybody that doesn't have a valid ID does have lots of free time on their hands.
It's a diversion folks.
Nothing more.
The demobrats keep bringing up the numbers regarding voter fraud. There are absolutely no valid numbers on this subject. Those practicing fraudulent activities have a risk of jail time, so, they attempt to avoid detection.
It would be interesting to find out if Mr. Lopez votes in Pennsylvania this election. (I like a good conspiracy theory as well as the next guy.) This is a step in the process. Verify the voter has moved before placing 'his' vote. What is the likelihood that this would be detected?