Warning to those headed to Henderson, NV casinos...

Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: rdalert447
And how were they to determine that in a split second?


Because he wasn't threatening the police or acting aggressively.

They shoot you for that in Henderson.

Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: johnzimbo
It wasn't excessive force because the dude had tattoos


Are you fucking serious?? I can't believe you'd fucking think that way about someone you never met.



Whoa Snidely, that's out of character for you, take it easy.
Quote

Originally posted by: surf87
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: johnzimbo
It wasn't excessive force because the dude had tattoos


Are you fucking serious?? I can't believe you'd fucking think that way about someone you never met.



Whoa Snidely, that's out of character for you, take it easy.


I knew it. I knew my faux outrage over a faux post would be taken seriously. Sorry for the faux outrage.
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: surf87
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: johnzimbo
It wasn't excessive force because the dude had tattoos


Are you fucking serious?? I can't believe you'd fucking think that way about someone you never met.



Whoa Snidely, that's out of character for you, take it easy.


I knew it. I knew my faux outrage over a faux post would be taken seriously. Sorry for the faux outrage.


Maybe it was a faux chastise.


Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: surf87
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: johnzimbo
It wasn't excessive force because the dude had tattoos


Are you fucking serious?? I can't believe you'd fucking think that way about someone you never met.



Whoa Snidely, that's out of character for you, take it easy.


I knew it. I knew my faux outrage over a faux post would be taken seriously. Sorry for the faux outrage.


Maybe it was a faux chastise.


No worries, faux or otherwise

What the faux
Quote

Originally posted by: rdalert447 Your argument speaks to whether or not the suspect should've been CHARGED CRIMINALLY for those actions. I never said that. I said the officers were justified in their use of force.
.... against someone who wasn't doing anything criminal (by your own logic).

Quote

Originally posted by: rdalert447
And how were they to determine that in a split second?
Uh, the same way we all do, every split second of our lives? Just a guess.
You can not put yourself in the officers place.
You do not have the training they have which results with a split second reaction.
I guess in your opinion, the police should stand around to see If they get shot by someone they had 100% reason to pull over.
They had reason to pull him over and their training alerted their instincts to him resisting.
We live in a free society, not the dictatorship you imagine for us. That means the police are bound by the same legal constructs as all of us. They must act within the limits of a free society. They can't shoot first and ask questions later.

When they make a traffic stop, they do, in fact and in law, need to wait to be shot at, before shooting the motorist. Or at least apply the same rules of self-defense the rest of us do before we pull the trigger.

Sorry to interrupt your bizarre S&M fantasy.
They didn't shoot.

and WTF is the S&M comment for? Can you not have a civil debate without insults?
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now