WHA-A-AT?

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Bob get's punk'd again, Margaret Sanger said no such thing.

Perhaps.

But Ms. Sanger opinion of the Negro was clear in her letter to Dr. C.J. Gamble, December 10, 1939, addressing The Negro Project:
"here is only one thing that I would like to be in touch with and that is the Negro Project of the South which, if the execution of the details remain in Miss Rose's hands, my suggestions will not be confusing because she knows the way my mind works

Miss Rose sent me a copy of your letter of December 5th and I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience where I have been in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee and Texas, that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts. They do not do this with the white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the Clinic he can go among them with enthusiasm and with knowledge, which, I believe, will have far-reaching results among the colored people. His work in my opinion should be entirely with the Negro profession and the nurses, hospital, social workers, as well as the County's white doctors. His success will depend upon his personality and his training by us

The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
[boldface added - DD]

Ref: Smith College Library
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Bob get's punk'd again, Margaret Sanger said no such thing.

Perhaps.

But Ms. Sanger opinion of the Negro was clear in her letter to Dr. C.J. Gamble, December 10, 1939, addressing The Negro Project:
"here is only one thing that I would like to be in touch with and that is the Negro Project of the South which, if the execution of the details remain in Miss Rose's hands, my suggestions will not be confusing because she knows the way my mind works

Miss Rose sent me a copy of your letter of December 5th and I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience where I have been in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee and Texas, that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts. They do not do this with the white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the Clinic he can go among them with enthusiasm and with knowledge, which, I believe, will have far-reaching results among the colored people. His work in my opinion should be entirely with the Negro profession and the nurses, hospital, social workers, as well as the County's white doctors. His success will depend upon his personality and his training by us

The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
[boldface added - DD]

Ref: Smith College Library
What does DonDiego find objectionable? That she wanted to hire and train black doctors? That she used the term "Negro" about 80 years ago? That she inferred that black people would not trust white people? (In the South - can you imagine that?) Or was it that she said that blacks had ignorance, suspicions and doubts about birth control.

You know, like that average White evangelical in the South these days?
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh There's a reason why the Republican brand is at an all time low.

Just low enough to control the House and Senate.
Mississippi gets as many senators as New York, South Dakota as many as California. So much for the Senate. And House seats have been gerrymandered to favor Republicans. If you try to deny that I'll embarass you.


I'll deny it. Start embarrassing.
You're from Texas, right. Here is an excerpt from a federal court filing by the former Republican Attorney General and CURRENT Republican Governor Greg Abbott of Texas:



And the Republican State Leadership Conference (rslc.GOP) is responsible for this:



That was easy!


But it failed to embarrass anyone but yourself. Look into the very things you posted a little deeper. There is a difference between gerrymandering and UN-gerrymandering.

Who decided the words "negro" and "colored" are terrible and racist? "Niger", to the best of my knowledge, was always a derogatory term so it's a completely different sort of issue.

I find nothing in Ms. Sanger's note that should be considered offensive. Certainly nothing offensive was intended, and in fact, she appeared to have admirable intentions.


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Bob get's punk'd again, Margaret Sanger said no such thing.

Perhaps.

But Ms. Sanger opinion of the Negro was clear in her letter to Dr. C.J. Gamble, December 10, 1939, addressing The Negro Project:
"here is only one thing that I would like to be in touch with and that is the Negro Project of the South which, if the execution of the details remain in Miss Rose's hands, my suggestions will not be confusing because she knows the way my mind works

Miss Rose sent me a copy of your letter of December 5th and I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience where I have been in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee and Texas, that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts. They do not do this with the white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the Clinic he can go among them with enthusiasm and with knowledge, which, I believe, will have far-reaching results among the colored people. His work in my opinion should be entirely with the Negro profession and the nurses, hospital, social workers, as well as the County's white doctors. His success will depend upon his personality and his training by us

The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
[boldface added - DD]

Ref: Smith College Library
What does DonDiego find objectionable? That she wanted to hire and train black doctors? That she used the term "Negro" about 80 years ago? That she inferred that black people would not trust white people? (In the South - can you imagine that?) Or was it that she said that blacks had ignorance, suspicions and doubts about birth control.

You know, like that average White evangelical in the South these days?



Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh There's a reason why the Republican brand is at an all time low.

Just low enough to control the House and Senate.
Mississippi gets as many senators as New York, South Dakota as many as California. So much for the Senate. And House seats have been gerrymandered to favor Republicans. If you try to deny that I'll embarass you.


I'll deny it. Start embarrassing.
You're from Texas, right. Here is an excerpt from a federal court filing by the former Republican Attorney General and CURRENT Republican Governor Greg Abbott of Texas:



And the Republican State Leadership Conference (rslc.GOP) is responsible for this:



That was easy!


But it failed to embarrass anyone but yourself. Look into the very things you posted a little deeper...
If you insist.

The words of Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott:


According to the official GOP Redmap program:
I suspect that Trump would be difficult to work for. I also suspect, that he makes decisions quickly and decisively and doesn't look back. This can be seen as a flaw, but over the long run a willingness to assess and move rapidly is a good thing. This is a trait which has made him plenty of money.

Many people hate that Trump "generalizes", but as Boiler has argued in the past, generalization can be an extremely helpful trait. We all do it, yet Boiler and Trump are two of the few who are willing to verbalize their correct generalizations of very non-PC issues. Example is that Mexican's coming over the boarder are bad.

Both Trump and Boiler understand that not all Mexicans crossing the border are bad, yet splitting hairs doesn't get the needed job done.




Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Trump's top adviser bails even as Trump leads the polls. Nevermind Latinos and women....the man cant even keep his inner circle on board. I hope this doesn't hurt his poll numbers too much. Go Donald, go!

https://www.examiner.com/article/roger-stone-says-donald-trump-is-losing-grip-on-reality-quits-as-top-advisor

He is losing his grip on reality," Stone said, according to Politico. "He has these yes-men around him. And now he's living in a parallel world."


Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
I suspect that Trump would be difficult to work for. I also suspect, that he makes decisions quickly and decisively and doesn't look back. This can be seen as a flaw, but over the long run a willingness to assess and move rapidly is a good thing.


You just described the exact traits of the Iraq War architects.

This debate was the best piece of stand-up comedy I've seen in quite a while. Ohhh, did some of you really think this debate was serious?? Boy, did these men fool you....
Quote

Originally posted by: LurkerPoster
This debate was the best piece of stand-up comedy I've seen in quite a while. Ohhh, did some of you really think this debate was serious?? Boy, did these men fool you....
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, you've been a wonderful audience. I'll be here all week. Try the veal. And don't forget to tip your servers.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
What does DonDiego find objectionable?

DonDiego doesn't find anything in Ms. Sanger's letter objectionable. DonDiego believes everyone should be allowed to think what they choose to think and write what they want to write.

Poor old DonDiego was just addressing the earlier alleged Sanger-quotation, addressing colored people as weeds . . . to be exterminated. There is no verifiable source for that quotation.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now