Quote
Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVAQuote
Originally posted by: jasonwood we feel that it is the duty of the hotel to provide a safety, including hiring, training and supervising staff who come into contact with persons and personal property.
This is quite true. There are many things they must do to
provide for the safety of their guests. However, they are not
insurers. You could recover from them only if you could prove that they didn't do something they "should" have done.
These types of proofs do occur, but normally only in wrongful death lawsuits, where the potential proceeds justify the extensive costs of investigation, litigation, etc. There are some parallels to the recent cases of legionaire's disease at City Center (consider theft, or crime in general, as a disease). But your recovery in this case would almost certainly be limited to the raw value of the jewelry, so pursuing such would be merely a curiousity. In addition, while you set out to prove they didn't do something they should have, they'd be doing the same thing, trying to prove that you didn't do something you should have. Their case would be much easier to prove (or at least easier to argue).
A world where hotels are always responsible for small injuries to their guests (strict liability) is probably not a world most travellers would actually enjoy.