Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
guys, the player does not have to CONTROL the outcome. it is a random game. But only the Player (the shooter) sets the dice on its path. if the dice hit a pyramid or hit a stack of chips it is because the shooter threw the dice in such a way that they hit the pyramid or the stack of chips.
there is no outside influence affecting the game.
Of course, the person who placed the chips on the table had no inflence on the dice whatsoever. They would have bounced exactly the same had the bet no bet been made and chips not placed on the table. Do you ever take one second to think about the nonsense you type?
You mean like the specs of the table and the other gazillion thing we have mentioned. Essentially, the table itself acts as the RNG randomizing the toss of the player. The player initiates the process and the table/environment randomizes the result. You know, just like a player pressing the deal/draw button in VP and the RNG randomizing the event.
And, in both cases any change the way the player initiates the event changes the result. This is really simple stuff and your continued effort to ignore simple concepts is making you look really bad ... you know, just like I warned you.
So, a 300 pound person leaning on the table will have zero effect. Have you gone completely bonkers?
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
guys, the player does not have to CONTROL the outcome. it is a random game. But only the Player (the shooter) sets the dice on its path. if the dice hit a pyramid or hit a stack of chips it is because the shooter threw the dice in such a way that they hit the pyramid or the stack of chips.
there is no outside influence affecting the game.
Of course, the person who placed the chips on the table had no inflence on the dice whatsoever. They would have bounced exactly the same had the bet no bet been made and chips not placed on the table. Do you ever take one second to think about the nonsense you type?
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
the game is two dice being thrown on a table, and to that only the shooter does the work. there is no other variable in the game such as an RNG or a shuffle of cards.
You mean like the specs of the table and the other gazillion thing we have mentioned. Essentially, the table itself acts as the RNG randomizing the toss of the player. The player initiates the process and the table/environment randomizes the result. You know, just like a player pressing the deal/draw button in VP and the RNG randomizing the event.
And, in both cases any change the way the player initiates the event changes the result. This is really simple stuff and your continued effort to ignore simple concepts is making you look really bad ... you know, just like I warned you.
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
you seem to think that because the game is random (not talking about DI here) that the shooter is not responsbile for the dice. well, only the shooter is responsible for the dice.
and Arc, please, no craps table is on a soft carpet that would be affected when someone leans on the table. please. if you are going to create scenarios, at least make them a bit realistic. and all craps tables are unique, even if they are made with the same specs -- every craps player knows that. but we also know that the craps table doesnt move the dice. we know that the dice move on the craps table.
So, a 300 pound person leaning on the table will have zero effect. Have you gone completely bonkers?
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
what is amazing is that all of this back and forth is over a basic concept that the shooter throws two dice and the result of that throw determines the game, and that there is no shuffle of cards, no RNG, no spinning wheel or anything by a third party. its all the shooter. and we've gone eight pages because some of you think that a random game somehow takes the end result away from the shooter-- when it is the shooter who is participating in a random game.
wow.
Yes, there is a randomizing agent. It is the environment including the table and everything else that has been mentioned. Just because you can't see this is functionally identical to VP and an RNG says one heck of a lot about you. It also explains why you've been so confused about all the other aspects of VP and why you believe the nonsense Singer spews. You simply have no capability for critical thinking.